E. Lorente-Ramos , A.M. Hernández-Díaz , J. Pérez-Aracil , S. Salcedo-Sanz
{"title":"基于牛顿法和钢本构模型可解区域的结构混凝土剪切分析改进机器学习策略","authors":"E. Lorente-Ramos , A.M. Hernández-Díaz , J. Pérez-Aracil , S. Salcedo-Sanz","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Compression Field Theories (CFTs) can predict the full non-linear response of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams subjected to shear, considering the equilibrium and compatibility conditions in the cracked web of the beam, and the corresponding stress-strain relationships of the involved materials. These theories are supported by a set of non-linear algebraic governing equations whose numerical solution (which contains, among others, the inclination of the diagonal concrete struts, or crack angle) has been calculated through several strategies in the last years. Between them, machine learning methods arise as the best and most effective procedure for this aim, since, contrary to the traditional Newton-type methods, they do not require taking initial approximations to the numerical solution. Thus, in this work we present a new variant of the application of machine learning to the CFTs, based on Newton’s method as optimizer. Moreover, the training of this new strategy considered the existence of a solvability region for the steel constitutive model, as well as the location of the steel apparent yield strain in such region. In this sense, a classification sub-procedure about the location of such strain is implemented. As result, this new hybrid regression model, based on the Newton’s method and trained with previous classification, not only does not depend on initial approximations, but it predicts significantly better the experimental shear response of cracked reinforced and prestressed concrete beams than those machine learning strategies developed in previous works. In this work we propose an improved machine learning strategy for shear analysis in structural concrete based on the Newton’s method and the solvability region of the steel constitutive model</div></div>","PeriodicalId":352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Physics","volume":"541 ","pages":"Article 114303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved machine learning strategy for shear analysis in structural concrete based on the Newton’s method and the solvability region of the steel constitutive model\",\"authors\":\"E. Lorente-Ramos , A.M. Hernández-Díaz , J. Pérez-Aracil , S. Salcedo-Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Compression Field Theories (CFTs) can predict the full non-linear response of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams subjected to shear, considering the equilibrium and compatibility conditions in the cracked web of the beam, and the corresponding stress-strain relationships of the involved materials. These theories are supported by a set of non-linear algebraic governing equations whose numerical solution (which contains, among others, the inclination of the diagonal concrete struts, or crack angle) has been calculated through several strategies in the last years. Between them, machine learning methods arise as the best and most effective procedure for this aim, since, contrary to the traditional Newton-type methods, they do not require taking initial approximations to the numerical solution. Thus, in this work we present a new variant of the application of machine learning to the CFTs, based on Newton’s method as optimizer. Moreover, the training of this new strategy considered the existence of a solvability region for the steel constitutive model, as well as the location of the steel apparent yield strain in such region. In this sense, a classification sub-procedure about the location of such strain is implemented. As result, this new hybrid regression model, based on the Newton’s method and trained with previous classification, not only does not depend on initial approximations, but it predicts significantly better the experimental shear response of cracked reinforced and prestressed concrete beams than those machine learning strategies developed in previous works. In this work we propose an improved machine learning strategy for shear analysis in structural concrete based on the Newton’s method and the solvability region of the steel constitutive model</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Physics\",\"volume\":\"541 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999125005868\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999125005868","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An improved machine learning strategy for shear analysis in structural concrete based on the Newton’s method and the solvability region of the steel constitutive model
The Compression Field Theories (CFTs) can predict the full non-linear response of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams subjected to shear, considering the equilibrium and compatibility conditions in the cracked web of the beam, and the corresponding stress-strain relationships of the involved materials. These theories are supported by a set of non-linear algebraic governing equations whose numerical solution (which contains, among others, the inclination of the diagonal concrete struts, or crack angle) has been calculated through several strategies in the last years. Between them, machine learning methods arise as the best and most effective procedure for this aim, since, contrary to the traditional Newton-type methods, they do not require taking initial approximations to the numerical solution. Thus, in this work we present a new variant of the application of machine learning to the CFTs, based on Newton’s method as optimizer. Moreover, the training of this new strategy considered the existence of a solvability region for the steel constitutive model, as well as the location of the steel apparent yield strain in such region. In this sense, a classification sub-procedure about the location of such strain is implemented. As result, this new hybrid regression model, based on the Newton’s method and trained with previous classification, not only does not depend on initial approximations, but it predicts significantly better the experimental shear response of cracked reinforced and prestressed concrete beams than those machine learning strategies developed in previous works. In this work we propose an improved machine learning strategy for shear analysis in structural concrete based on the Newton’s method and the solvability region of the steel constitutive model
期刊介绍:
Journal of Computational Physics thoroughly treats the computational aspects of physical problems, presenting techniques for the numerical solution of mathematical equations arising in all areas of physics. The journal seeks to emphasize methods that cross disciplinary boundaries.
The Journal of Computational Physics also publishes short notes of 4 pages or less (including figures, tables, and references but excluding title pages). Letters to the Editor commenting on articles already published in this Journal will also be considered. Neither notes nor letters should have an abstract.