在有淋巴结累及的右侧乳腺癌VMAT中,DIBH对辐照肺体积的益处被高估了

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mikko Mankinen , Tuomas Virén , Jan Seppälä , Kristiina Vuolukka , Kimmo Myllyoja , Janne Heikkilä , Tuomas Koivumäki
{"title":"在有淋巴结累及的右侧乳腺癌VMAT中,DIBH对辐照肺体积的益处被高估了","authors":"Mikko Mankinen ,&nbsp;Tuomas Virén ,&nbsp;Jan Seppälä ,&nbsp;Kristiina Vuolukka ,&nbsp;Kimmo Myllyoja ,&nbsp;Janne Heikkilä ,&nbsp;Tuomas Koivumäki","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is the preferred technique over free-breathing (FB) to reduce the irradiated lung volume, based on direct comparisons of dose-volume histogram (DVH) values. This study employs deformable image registration (DIR) to account for the non-uniform lung expansion in assessing the actual benefit of DIBH in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 25 patients, divided between two treatment planners, with retrospective VMAT plans for right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement in both DIBH and FB anatomy. The irradiated ipsilateral lung volumes of V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy were transferred from DIBH CT onto the FB CT image using DIR. DVH parameters were calculated based on the transferred irradiated lung volumes and compared to the planned values in the FB image anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The irradiated V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy volumes of the ipsilateral lung increased after transferring from DIBH CT to FB CT (21.3 % to 23.1 %, 35.6 % to 38.9 % and 53.4 % to 57.3 % by median, respectively, p &lt; 0.001), regardless of planner (p &gt; 0.49). To achieve dosimetric benefits with DIBH compared to FB, reductions in lung DVH parameters between −7.2 % and −4.9 %, relative to planned FB values, are required.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The apparent dosimetric benefit of DIBH on the irradiated lung volume over FB is overestimated at the planning stage. However, DIBH can reduce the dose to all organs at risk through rigorous treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The benefit of DIBH on irradiated lung volume is overestimated in right-sided breast cancer VMAT with node involvement\",\"authors\":\"Mikko Mankinen ,&nbsp;Tuomas Virén ,&nbsp;Jan Seppälä ,&nbsp;Kristiina Vuolukka ,&nbsp;Kimmo Myllyoja ,&nbsp;Janne Heikkilä ,&nbsp;Tuomas Koivumäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is the preferred technique over free-breathing (FB) to reduce the irradiated lung volume, based on direct comparisons of dose-volume histogram (DVH) values. This study employs deformable image registration (DIR) to account for the non-uniform lung expansion in assessing the actual benefit of DIBH in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 25 patients, divided between two treatment planners, with retrospective VMAT plans for right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement in both DIBH and FB anatomy. The irradiated ipsilateral lung volumes of V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy were transferred from DIBH CT onto the FB CT image using DIR. DVH parameters were calculated based on the transferred irradiated lung volumes and compared to the planned values in the FB image anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The irradiated V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy volumes of the ipsilateral lung increased after transferring from DIBH CT to FB CT (21.3 % to 23.1 %, 35.6 % to 38.9 % and 53.4 % to 57.3 % by median, respectively, p &lt; 0.001), regardless of planner (p &gt; 0.49). To achieve dosimetric benefits with DIBH compared to FB, reductions in lung DVH parameters between −7.2 % and −4.9 %, relative to planned FB values, are required.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The apparent dosimetric benefit of DIBH on the irradiated lung volume over FB is overestimated at the planning stage. However, DIBH can reduce the dose to all organs at risk through rigorous treatment planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的根据剂量-体积直方图(DVH)值的直接比较,深度吸气屏气(DIBH)是比自由呼吸(FB)更可取的减少辐照肺体积的技术。本研究采用可变形图像配准(DIR)来解释非均匀肺扩张,以评估DIBH在体积调节弧线治疗(VMAT)中对伴有局部淋巴结受累的右侧乳腺癌的实际益处。方法本研究纳入25例患者,分为两组治疗方案,采用回顾性VMAT计划治疗双侧乳腺和双侧FB解剖区域淋巴结累及的右侧乳腺癌。用DIR将辐照后的同侧肺V16Gy、V8Gy和V4Gy的肺体积从DIBH CT转移到FB CT图像上。DVH参数根据转移的辐照肺体积计算,并与FB图像解剖中的计划值进行比较。结果与计划者无关(p > 0.49), DIBH CT转FB CT后同侧肺V16Gy、V8Gy和V4Gy体积中位数分别为21.3% ~ 23.1%、35.6% ~ 38.9%和53.4% ~ 57.3% (p < 0.001)。为了获得与FB相比DIBH的剂量学优势,相对于计划的FB值,需要将肺DVH参数降低- 7.2%至- 4.9%。结论在计划阶段,DIBH对受照肺体积的表观剂量学效益被高估了。然而,通过严格的治疗计划,DIBH可以减少对所有有危险器官的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The benefit of DIBH on irradiated lung volume is overestimated in right-sided breast cancer VMAT with node involvement

Background and purpose

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is the preferred technique over free-breathing (FB) to reduce the irradiated lung volume, based on direct comparisons of dose-volume histogram (DVH) values. This study employs deformable image registration (DIR) to account for the non-uniform lung expansion in assessing the actual benefit of DIBH in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement.

Methods

The study included 25 patients, divided between two treatment planners, with retrospective VMAT plans for right-sided breast cancer with regional node involvement in both DIBH and FB anatomy. The irradiated ipsilateral lung volumes of V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy were transferred from DIBH CT onto the FB CT image using DIR. DVH parameters were calculated based on the transferred irradiated lung volumes and compared to the planned values in the FB image anatomy.

Results

The irradiated V16Gy, V8Gy and V4Gy volumes of the ipsilateral lung increased after transferring from DIBH CT to FB CT (21.3 % to 23.1 %, 35.6 % to 38.9 % and 53.4 % to 57.3 % by median, respectively, p < 0.001), regardless of planner (p > 0.49). To achieve dosimetric benefits with DIBH compared to FB, reductions in lung DVH parameters between −7.2 % and −4.9 %, relative to planned FB values, are required.

Conclusions

The apparent dosimetric benefit of DIBH on the irradiated lung volume over FB is overestimated at the planning stage. However, DIBH can reduce the dose to all organs at risk through rigorous treatment planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信