{"title":"在大麻的影响下驾驶:使用者的想法和为什么它很重要","authors":"Viviana C. Zambrano , Marisa E. Auguste","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies of national cannabis trends show many U.S. adults and adolescents see cannabis as mostly harmless (<span><span>Hasin, 2018</span></span>, <span><span>Hasin and Walsh, 2021</span></span>), a view causing concern in Connecticut amid legalization, due to risks from cannabis-impaired driving. These concerns amplified the urgent need for evidence-based strategies to prevent driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC), primarily through effective public messaging. In response, this study sought to: (a) understand how cannabis users in Connecticut perceive and engage in DUIC; (b) explore their views on the legal consequences of DUIC; and (c) identify the messaging strategies they believe would be most effective in deterring this behavior. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating a statewide online survey (n = 345) and focus groups (n = 13). Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and chi-square tests, while thematic analysis was performed on focus group discussions. Among survey respondents, 228 reported they would refrain from driving high if they thought it was as risky as drunk driving, whereas 30 said they would still drive under the influence. Additionally, 262 participants expressed skepticism about law enforcement’s ability to detect cannabis impairment accurately, and 266 felt that DUIC should carry different legal penalties than drunk driving. Focus group participants identified as frequent cannabis users strongly rejected fear-based messaging and stigma, instead favoring campaigns that promoted safe driving through realistic scenarios and practical guidance. They also emphasized the importance of credible sources and relatable communication. The findings underscore the importance of user-focused, behaviorally informed traffic safety strategies and offer guidance for policymakers shaping cannabis-related road safety and education programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103337"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving under the influence of cannabis: What users think and why it matters\",\"authors\":\"Viviana C. Zambrano , Marisa E. Auguste\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Studies of national cannabis trends show many U.S. adults and adolescents see cannabis as mostly harmless (<span><span>Hasin, 2018</span></span>, <span><span>Hasin and Walsh, 2021</span></span>), a view causing concern in Connecticut amid legalization, due to risks from cannabis-impaired driving. These concerns amplified the urgent need for evidence-based strategies to prevent driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC), primarily through effective public messaging. In response, this study sought to: (a) understand how cannabis users in Connecticut perceive and engage in DUIC; (b) explore their views on the legal consequences of DUIC; and (c) identify the messaging strategies they believe would be most effective in deterring this behavior. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating a statewide online survey (n = 345) and focus groups (n = 13). Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and chi-square tests, while thematic analysis was performed on focus group discussions. Among survey respondents, 228 reported they would refrain from driving high if they thought it was as risky as drunk driving, whereas 30 said they would still drive under the influence. Additionally, 262 participants expressed skepticism about law enforcement’s ability to detect cannabis impairment accurately, and 266 felt that DUIC should carry different legal penalties than drunk driving. Focus group participants identified as frequent cannabis users strongly rejected fear-based messaging and stigma, instead favoring campaigns that promoted safe driving through realistic scenarios and practical guidance. They also emphasized the importance of credible sources and relatable communication. The findings underscore the importance of user-focused, behaviorally informed traffic safety strategies and offer guidance for policymakers shaping cannabis-related road safety and education programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Driving under the influence of cannabis: What users think and why it matters
Studies of national cannabis trends show many U.S. adults and adolescents see cannabis as mostly harmless (Hasin, 2018, Hasin and Walsh, 2021), a view causing concern in Connecticut amid legalization, due to risks from cannabis-impaired driving. These concerns amplified the urgent need for evidence-based strategies to prevent driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC), primarily through effective public messaging. In response, this study sought to: (a) understand how cannabis users in Connecticut perceive and engage in DUIC; (b) explore their views on the legal consequences of DUIC; and (c) identify the messaging strategies they believe would be most effective in deterring this behavior. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating a statewide online survey (n = 345) and focus groups (n = 13). Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and chi-square tests, while thematic analysis was performed on focus group discussions. Among survey respondents, 228 reported they would refrain from driving high if they thought it was as risky as drunk driving, whereas 30 said they would still drive under the influence. Additionally, 262 participants expressed skepticism about law enforcement’s ability to detect cannabis impairment accurately, and 266 felt that DUIC should carry different legal penalties than drunk driving. Focus group participants identified as frequent cannabis users strongly rejected fear-based messaging and stigma, instead favoring campaigns that promoted safe driving through realistic scenarios and practical guidance. They also emphasized the importance of credible sources and relatable communication. The findings underscore the importance of user-focused, behaviorally informed traffic safety strategies and offer guidance for policymakers shaping cannabis-related road safety and education programs.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.