你不喜欢我们吗?你不想要我们吗?移民文化适应策略对收容社区成员排斥认知的影响

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Susan E. Watt, Yvette D. Alcott, Sarah Feng, Adam Keleher, Ned I. Littlewood
{"title":"你不喜欢我们吗?你不想要我们吗?移民文化适应策略对收容社区成员排斥认知的影响","authors":"Susan E. Watt,&nbsp;Yvette D. Alcott,&nbsp;Sarah Feng,&nbsp;Adam Keleher,&nbsp;Ned I. Littlewood","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Host nationals typically perceive immigrants who acculturate by using the separation strategy less positively than those using the other strategies of assimilation, integration, or marginalisation, which result from different combinations of host culture engagement and original culture maintenance. It is possible that seeing the separation strategy, where immigrants avoid the host culture and maintain the original culture, leads to host nationals feeling rejected. We conducted three studies of Australian citizens (total <em>N</em> = 863) to test this experimentally. In each study, participants viewed a vignette portraying an immigrant adopting one of the four acculturation strategies and then rated their cognitions of rejection (CoR) and other outcome variables. All studies revealed a causal effect of acculturation strategy on CoR, with separation producing the highest CoR. In Study 1, CoR then mediated an effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards the immigrant. In Study 2, perceived identification with Australia and CoR, in serial, mediated the effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards and trust of the immigrant. Study 3 demonstrated a generalisation effect where CoR mediated a relationship between acculturation strategy and affect towards immigrants generally. In each study, separation produced the most negative responses. Together, these results show affective consequences of immigrants’ acculturation strategy, where feeling rejected due to acculturation strategy leads to less positive emotions towards the immigrant, less positive stereotyping, and reduced trust.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don’t you like us? Don’t you want us? The influence of immigrants’ acculturation strategies on cognitions of rejection in host community members\",\"authors\":\"Susan E. Watt,&nbsp;Yvette D. Alcott,&nbsp;Sarah Feng,&nbsp;Adam Keleher,&nbsp;Ned I. Littlewood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Host nationals typically perceive immigrants who acculturate by using the separation strategy less positively than those using the other strategies of assimilation, integration, or marginalisation, which result from different combinations of host culture engagement and original culture maintenance. It is possible that seeing the separation strategy, where immigrants avoid the host culture and maintain the original culture, leads to host nationals feeling rejected. We conducted three studies of Australian citizens (total <em>N</em> = 863) to test this experimentally. In each study, participants viewed a vignette portraying an immigrant adopting one of the four acculturation strategies and then rated their cognitions of rejection (CoR) and other outcome variables. All studies revealed a causal effect of acculturation strategy on CoR, with separation producing the highest CoR. In Study 1, CoR then mediated an effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards the immigrant. In Study 2, perceived identification with Australia and CoR, in serial, mediated the effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards and trust of the immigrant. Study 3 demonstrated a generalisation effect where CoR mediated a relationship between acculturation strategy and affect towards immigrants generally. In each study, separation produced the most negative responses. Together, these results show affective consequences of immigrants’ acculturation strategy, where feeling rejected due to acculturation strategy leads to less positive emotions towards the immigrant, less positive stereotyping, and reduced trust.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725001348\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725001348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东道国通常认为采用分离策略适应的移民不如采用其他同化、融合或边缘化策略的移民积极,这是东道国文化参与和原始文化维护的不同组合造成的。有可能看到移民回避东道国文化而保持原有文化的分离策略,导致东道国感到被排斥。我们对澳大利亚公民进行了三项研究(总N = 863),以实验方式验证这一点。在每项研究中,参与者观看了一幅描绘移民采用四种文化适应策略之一的小插图,然后对他们的拒绝认知(CoR)和其他结果变量进行评估。所有研究都揭示了文化适应策略对移民心理的因果影响,其中分离对移民心理的影响最大。在研究1中,文化适应策略介导了移民心理对移民心理的影响。在研究2中,对澳大利亚和CoR的感知认同依次中介了文化适应策略对移民的情感和信任的影响。研究3证明了一种概括效应,即文化适应策略与对移民的总体影响之间存在着文化适应策略与对移民的总体影响之间的关系。在每项研究中,分离都产生了最负面的反应。综上所述,这些结果显示了移民文化适应策略的情感后果,由于文化适应策略而被拒绝的感觉导致对移民的积极情绪减少,积极刻板印象减少,信任减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Don’t you like us? Don’t you want us? The influence of immigrants’ acculturation strategies on cognitions of rejection in host community members
Host nationals typically perceive immigrants who acculturate by using the separation strategy less positively than those using the other strategies of assimilation, integration, or marginalisation, which result from different combinations of host culture engagement and original culture maintenance. It is possible that seeing the separation strategy, where immigrants avoid the host culture and maintain the original culture, leads to host nationals feeling rejected. We conducted three studies of Australian citizens (total N = 863) to test this experimentally. In each study, participants viewed a vignette portraying an immigrant adopting one of the four acculturation strategies and then rated their cognitions of rejection (CoR) and other outcome variables. All studies revealed a causal effect of acculturation strategy on CoR, with separation producing the highest CoR. In Study 1, CoR then mediated an effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards the immigrant. In Study 2, perceived identification with Australia and CoR, in serial, mediated the effect of acculturation strategy on affect towards and trust of the immigrant. Study 3 demonstrated a generalisation effect where CoR mediated a relationship between acculturation strategy and affect towards immigrants generally. In each study, separation produced the most negative responses. Together, these results show affective consequences of immigrants’ acculturation strategy, where feeling rejected due to acculturation strategy leads to less positive emotions towards the immigrant, less positive stereotyping, and reduced trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信