岩体中椭圆巷道顶板稳定性的运动极限分析

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Tae-Won Seo, Dowon Park
{"title":"岩体中椭圆巷道顶板稳定性的运动极限分析","authors":"Tae-Won Seo,&nbsp;Dowon Park","doi":"10.1002/nag.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Noncircular cross-sections are commonly encountered in engineering practice; however, primary attempts to analyze roof stability have focused on circular and rectangular configurations. This study investigates the roof stability of elliptical tunnels with varying aspect ratios, employing two semi-analytical approaches: piecewise linear and continuous analytical failure mechanisms. The former directly incorporates the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion, whereas the latter requires approximating its shear strength envelope through regression analysis. Notably, when the regression analysis achieved sufficient accuracy, the two approaches produced computationally consistent results (&lt;1% difference), including closely aligned failure surface geometries. The findings demonstrate that the roof stability of elliptical tunnels—evaluated in terms of stability number, factor of safety, and support pressure—varies significantly from that of standard cross-sections. Considering the self-weight of a detached rock block as the primary cause of roof collapse, elliptical tunnels with a small horizontal-to-vertical axis ratio (i.e., a vertically elongated major axis) exhibit enhanced stability compared to circular tunnels. This improved stability is attributed to increased confining stress in the roof region and a reduced collapse block size. Furthermore, a comparative analysis encompassing various practical tunnel cross-sections, including horseshoe and mining configurations, provides a comprehensive understanding of roof stability across diverse geometric profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 16","pages":"3880-3896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic Limit Analysis of Roof Stability for Elliptical Tunnels in Rock Masses\",\"authors\":\"Tae-Won Seo,&nbsp;Dowon Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.70053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Noncircular cross-sections are commonly encountered in engineering practice; however, primary attempts to analyze roof stability have focused on circular and rectangular configurations. This study investigates the roof stability of elliptical tunnels with varying aspect ratios, employing two semi-analytical approaches: piecewise linear and continuous analytical failure mechanisms. The former directly incorporates the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion, whereas the latter requires approximating its shear strength envelope through regression analysis. Notably, when the regression analysis achieved sufficient accuracy, the two approaches produced computationally consistent results (&lt;1% difference), including closely aligned failure surface geometries. The findings demonstrate that the roof stability of elliptical tunnels—evaluated in terms of stability number, factor of safety, and support pressure—varies significantly from that of standard cross-sections. Considering the self-weight of a detached rock block as the primary cause of roof collapse, elliptical tunnels with a small horizontal-to-vertical axis ratio (i.e., a vertically elongated major axis) exhibit enhanced stability compared to circular tunnels. This improved stability is attributed to increased confining stress in the roof region and a reduced collapse block size. Furthermore, a comparative analysis encompassing various practical tunnel cross-sections, including horseshoe and mining configurations, provides a comprehensive understanding of roof stability across diverse geometric profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"49 16\",\"pages\":\"3880-3896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.70053\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非圆截面在工程实践中经常遇到;然而,分析顶板稳定性的主要尝试集中在圆形和矩形结构上。本文采用分段线性和连续解析破坏机制两种半解析方法,对不同宽高比的椭圆巷道顶板稳定性进行了研究。前者直接采用广义Hoek-Brown准则,后者则需要通过回归分析近似其抗剪强度包络线。值得注意的是,当回归分析达到足够的精度时,两种方法产生的计算结果一致(相差1%),包括紧密排列的破坏面几何形状。研究结果表明,椭圆巷道的顶板稳定性——以稳定数、安全系数和支护压力来评价——与标准断面的稳定性有显著差异。考虑到分离岩块的自重是顶板坍塌的主要原因,与圆形隧道相比,具有较小水平与垂直轴比(即垂直延长的主轴)的椭圆隧道表现出更高的稳定性。这种稳定性的提高是由于顶板区域的围应力增加和崩塌块尺寸减小。此外,通过对各种实际隧道横截面(包括马蹄形和采矿结构)的比较分析,可以全面了解不同几何剖面的顶板稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Kinematic Limit Analysis of Roof Stability for Elliptical Tunnels in Rock Masses

Kinematic Limit Analysis of Roof Stability for Elliptical Tunnels in Rock Masses

Noncircular cross-sections are commonly encountered in engineering practice; however, primary attempts to analyze roof stability have focused on circular and rectangular configurations. This study investigates the roof stability of elliptical tunnels with varying aspect ratios, employing two semi-analytical approaches: piecewise linear and continuous analytical failure mechanisms. The former directly incorporates the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion, whereas the latter requires approximating its shear strength envelope through regression analysis. Notably, when the regression analysis achieved sufficient accuracy, the two approaches produced computationally consistent results (<1% difference), including closely aligned failure surface geometries. The findings demonstrate that the roof stability of elliptical tunnels—evaluated in terms of stability number, factor of safety, and support pressure—varies significantly from that of standard cross-sections. Considering the self-weight of a detached rock block as the primary cause of roof collapse, elliptical tunnels with a small horizontal-to-vertical axis ratio (i.e., a vertically elongated major axis) exhibit enhanced stability compared to circular tunnels. This improved stability is attributed to increased confining stress in the roof region and a reduced collapse block size. Furthermore, a comparative analysis encompassing various practical tunnel cross-sections, including horseshoe and mining configurations, provides a comprehensive understanding of roof stability across diverse geometric profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信