多样性设计:真实世界的数据,以提高临床癌症研究的代表性

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Thao T. Vo, Sangmi Kim, Ashley Jaksa, Benjamin Bates, Wei Zhou, Mark D. Stewart, Mehmet Burcu
{"title":"多样性设计:真实世界的数据,以提高临床癌症研究的代表性","authors":"Thao T. Vo, Sangmi Kim, Ashley Jaksa, Benjamin Bates, Wei Zhou, Mark D. Stewart, Mehmet Burcu","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and healthcare equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, cancer patients who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared to their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on under-represented populations, thus improving external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment and other elements, and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity by Design: Real-World Data to Enhance Representation in Clinical Cancer Research\",\"authors\":\"Thao T. Vo, Sangmi Kim, Ashley Jaksa, Benjamin Bates, Wei Zhou, Mark D. Stewart, Mehmet Burcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-1255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and healthcare equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, cancer patients who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared to their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on under-represented populations, thus improving external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment and other elements, and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-1255\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-1255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床试验的包容性和多样化招生通过提高普遍性和促进健康和医疗保健公平来促进对临床研究及其结果的信任。多样化的参与也有助于发现不同亚组之间治疗反应的潜在差异,从而加强精准医疗的努力。然而,参与临床试验的癌症患者更有可能是白种人,更年轻,更健康,而不是更广泛的癌症人群。鉴于正在出现的卫生当局指导和其他相关倡议要求进行更具代表性的试验,迫切需要制定和实施战略,以改善反映预期使用人群的研究人群的入组情况。真实世界数据/证据(RWD/E)可以帮助制定试验招募目标和策略,确定招募不同人群的驱动因素和障碍,并为代表性不足的人群提供补充证据,从而提高临床试验结果的外部有效性。在这篇前瞻性综述中,我们概述了包括人口统计学、临床、治疗环境和其他因素在内的多样性维度框架,并讨论了RWD/E提高临床试验代表性和多样性的机遇和挑战。具体来说,我们讨论了与肿瘤学临床开发相关的多样性维度,以及利用RWD改善临床开发阶段多样性的各种方法,并提供了用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity by Design: Real-World Data to Enhance Representation in Clinical Cancer Research
Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and healthcare equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, cancer patients who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared to their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on under-represented populations, thus improving external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment and other elements, and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信