{"title":"加巴喷丁类药物与哮喘发作风险:一项全国性回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yuya Kimura, Taisuke Jo, Norihiko Inoue, Maho Suzukawa, Hiroki Matsui, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2025-223240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Despite warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration about respiratory adverse events associated with gabapentinoids, direct evidence of their risk in patients with asthma is lacking. Methods Using a national administrative claims database, we prepared two active comparators—new user cohorts of patients with a history of neuropathic or chronic pain and asthma—initiating gabapentinoids and comparator drugs (tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)). Overlap propensity score weighting was used to control for potential confounders. The initial occurrence of asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (primary) or those requiring hospitalisation for asthma (secondary) was assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Findings In the TCAs cohort (171 393 gabapentinoids users and 5916 TCAs users), gabapentinoids use was associated with a higher incidence of primary (59.4 vs 33.7 per 100 person-years; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.60) and secondary outcomes (0.91 vs 0.42 per 100 person-years; 2.02, 1.11 to 3.68). In the SNRIs cohort (189 055 gabapentinoids users and 19 800 SNRIs users), using gabapentinoids was also associated with a higher incidence of primary outcome (63.5 vs 42.8 per 100 person-years; HR 1.24, 1.19 to 1.30). However, the difference in the secondary outcome did not reach statistical significance (0.93 vs 0.68 per 100 person-years; 1.24, 0.94 to 1.63). Interpretation Gabapentinoids were associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations compared with TCAs or SNRIs. Managing neuropathic or chronic pain in patients with asthma using gabapentinoids should be approached with caution. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gabapentinoids and risk for asthma exacerbations: a nationwide retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Yuya Kimura, Taisuke Jo, Norihiko Inoue, Maho Suzukawa, Hiroki Matsui, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2025-223240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Despite warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration about respiratory adverse events associated with gabapentinoids, direct evidence of their risk in patients with asthma is lacking. Methods Using a national administrative claims database, we prepared two active comparators—new user cohorts of patients with a history of neuropathic or chronic pain and asthma—initiating gabapentinoids and comparator drugs (tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)). Overlap propensity score weighting was used to control for potential confounders. The initial occurrence of asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (primary) or those requiring hospitalisation for asthma (secondary) was assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Findings In the TCAs cohort (171 393 gabapentinoids users and 5916 TCAs users), gabapentinoids use was associated with a higher incidence of primary (59.4 vs 33.7 per 100 person-years; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.60) and secondary outcomes (0.91 vs 0.42 per 100 person-years; 2.02, 1.11 to 3.68). In the SNRIs cohort (189 055 gabapentinoids users and 19 800 SNRIs users), using gabapentinoids was also associated with a higher incidence of primary outcome (63.5 vs 42.8 per 100 person-years; HR 1.24, 1.19 to 1.30). However, the difference in the secondary outcome did not reach statistical significance (0.93 vs 0.68 per 100 person-years; 1.24, 0.94 to 1.63). Interpretation Gabapentinoids were associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations compared with TCAs or SNRIs. Managing neuropathic or chronic pain in patients with asthma using gabapentinoids should be approached with caution. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thorax\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2025-223240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2025-223240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管美国食品和药物管理局警告加巴喷丁类药物与呼吸系统不良事件相关,但缺乏其对哮喘患者风险的直接证据。方法利用国家行政索赔数据库,我们准备了两个有效的比较物——有神经性或慢性疼痛和哮喘病史的加巴喷丁类药物和比较物(三环抗抑郁药(TCAs)或5 -羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs))的新用户队列。重叠倾向评分加权用于控制潜在的混杂因素。使用加权Cox比例风险模型评估需要全身性皮质类固醇(原发性)或需要因哮喘住院(继发性)的哮喘加重的初始发生率。在TCAs队列(17393名加巴喷丁类药物使用者和5916名TCAs使用者)中,加巴喷丁类药物的使用与较高的原发性发病率(59.4 vs 33.7 / 100人-年;HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.34 - 1.60)和继发性结局(0.91 vs 0.42 / 100人-年;2.02,1.11 - 3.68)相关。在SNRIs队列中(189055名加巴喷丁类药物使用者和19800名SNRIs使用者),使用加巴喷丁类药物也与较高的主要结局发生率相关(63.5 vs 42.8 / 100人-年;HR 1.24, 1.19至1.30)。然而,次要结局的差异没有达到统计学意义(0.93 vs 0.68 / 100人年;1.24,0.94 ~ 1.63)。与TCAs或SNRIs相比,加巴喷丁类药物与哮喘发作风险增加相关。使用加巴喷丁类药物治疗哮喘患者的神经性或慢性疼痛时应谨慎。所有与研究相关的数据都包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
Gabapentinoids and risk for asthma exacerbations: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
Introduction Despite warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration about respiratory adverse events associated with gabapentinoids, direct evidence of their risk in patients with asthma is lacking. Methods Using a national administrative claims database, we prepared two active comparators—new user cohorts of patients with a history of neuropathic or chronic pain and asthma—initiating gabapentinoids and comparator drugs (tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)). Overlap propensity score weighting was used to control for potential confounders. The initial occurrence of asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (primary) or those requiring hospitalisation for asthma (secondary) was assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Findings In the TCAs cohort (171 393 gabapentinoids users and 5916 TCAs users), gabapentinoids use was associated with a higher incidence of primary (59.4 vs 33.7 per 100 person-years; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.60) and secondary outcomes (0.91 vs 0.42 per 100 person-years; 2.02, 1.11 to 3.68). In the SNRIs cohort (189 055 gabapentinoids users and 19 800 SNRIs users), using gabapentinoids was also associated with a higher incidence of primary outcome (63.5 vs 42.8 per 100 person-years; HR 1.24, 1.19 to 1.30). However, the difference in the secondary outcome did not reach statistical significance (0.93 vs 0.68 per 100 person-years; 1.24, 0.94 to 1.63). Interpretation Gabapentinoids were associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations compared with TCAs or SNRIs. Managing neuropathic or chronic pain in patients with asthma using gabapentinoids should be approached with caution. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.