有组织的伪善与殖民逻辑。解释欧盟对俄罗斯/乌克兰和以色列/巴勒斯坦严重违反国际法的不同反应

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Daniela Verena Huber
{"title":"有组织的伪善与殖民逻辑。解释欧盟对俄罗斯/乌克兰和以色列/巴勒斯坦严重违反国际法的不同反应","authors":"Daniela Verena Huber","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>‘Organized hypocrisy’ has been mainly explained in IR by the logic of consequentiality operating against the logic of appropriateness. The literature has largely ignored the role of a third logic, the logic of coloniality, which highlights that organized hypocrisy appears persistently in international relations due to omissions in the field of knowledge: It features a double absence of the ‘other’ on their own normative terms and as a rights-bearing subject. Pursuing a comparative analysis of EU policies to ensure accountability in the face of grave violations of international law in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Palestine, this research finds patterned discrepancies, particularly towards Palestine which are explained by imaginations in official EU discourse where Russia, Ukraine and Israel figure in a Eurocentric temporal–spatial relation to Europe, while Palestine is dispossessed of its history, not set into any relationship to Europe and figures as a partially rights-less subject in official EU discourse.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 5","pages":"1638-1660"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organized Hypocrisy and the Logic of Coloniality. Explaining the EU's Divergent Response to Grave Violations of International Law in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Palestine\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Verena Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>‘Organized hypocrisy’ has been mainly explained in IR by the logic of consequentiality operating against the logic of appropriateness. The literature has largely ignored the role of a third logic, the logic of coloniality, which highlights that organized hypocrisy appears persistently in international relations due to omissions in the field of knowledge: It features a double absence of the ‘other’ on their own normative terms and as a rights-bearing subject. Pursuing a comparative analysis of EU policies to ensure accountability in the face of grave violations of international law in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Palestine, this research finds patterned discrepancies, particularly towards Palestine which are explained by imaginations in official EU discourse where Russia, Ukraine and Israel figure in a Eurocentric temporal–spatial relation to Europe, while Palestine is dispossessed of its history, not set into any relationship to Europe and figures as a partially rights-less subject in official EU discourse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"1638-1660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13737\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际关系中,“有组织的伪善”主要被解释为结果性逻辑与适当性逻辑的对立。文献在很大程度上忽略了第三种逻辑的作用,即殖民逻辑,它强调了由于知识领域的遗漏,有组织的伪善在国际关系中持续出现:它的特点是双重缺乏“他者”在他们自己的规范条件下和作为一个承担权利的主体。通过对欧盟政策进行比较分析,以确保在俄罗斯/乌克兰和以色列/巴勒斯坦严重违反国际法的情况下承担责任,本研究发现了模式上的差异,特别是对巴勒斯坦的差异,这可以通过欧盟官方话语中的想象来解释,其中俄罗斯、乌克兰和以色列与欧洲处于以欧洲为中心的时空关系中,而巴勒斯坦则被剥夺了其历史。没有与欧洲建立任何关系,在欧盟官方话语中被视为部分缺乏权利的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organized Hypocrisy and the Logic of Coloniality. Explaining the EU's Divergent Response to Grave Violations of International Law in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Palestine

‘Organized hypocrisy’ has been mainly explained in IR by the logic of consequentiality operating against the logic of appropriateness. The literature has largely ignored the role of a third logic, the logic of coloniality, which highlights that organized hypocrisy appears persistently in international relations due to omissions in the field of knowledge: It features a double absence of the ‘other’ on their own normative terms and as a rights-bearing subject. Pursuing a comparative analysis of EU policies to ensure accountability in the face of grave violations of international law in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Palestine, this research finds patterned discrepancies, particularly towards Palestine which are explained by imaginations in official EU discourse where Russia, Ukraine and Israel figure in a Eurocentric temporal–spatial relation to Europe, while Palestine is dispossessed of its history, not set into any relationship to Europe and figures as a partially rights-less subject in official EU discourse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信