援助即绥靖:反恐怖主义条款对欧盟在巴勒斯坦被占领土援助制度的侵蚀

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mariam Salameh-Puvogel
{"title":"援助即绥靖:反恐怖主义条款对欧盟在巴勒斯坦被占领土援助制度的侵蚀","authors":"Mariam Salameh-Puvogel","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article engages the European Union's (EU) implementation of counterterrorism clauses as part of its development aid regulations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). The point of departure for the research is the shift in the EU's policy for aid regulations in the OPT in 2019, when the EU began to gradually implement counterterrorism clauses in its grant contracts, a measure that sparked widespread protests amongst Palestinian non-governmental organisations (NGOs), who critiqued the clauses as an explicit attempt to further pacify civil society. Situated within the realms of postcolonial theory and critical security studies, the article draws on semi-structured interviews with staff and representatives of Palestinian NGOs in the OPT in order to unpack perspectives of civil society actors who interpret the policy as an illegitimate interference with their political self-determination, in particular the internationally recognised right to resist colonial subjugation. The conceptual framework of pacification – as an inconspicuous, diffuse form of violence within liberal governance aimed at suppressing resistance to the prevailing order – aligns closely with both perspectives on the ground and postcolonial thought. As such, the article elucidates tensions between an expanding European counterterrorism regime, increasingly permeating the sphere of development aid, and perspectives of Palestinian civil society actors who discern these policies as deeply rooted in colonial paradigms. Whilst exploring these tensions, the intricate relationship between postcolonial research and allyship lingers as an underlying notion. This premise assumes heightened relevance within the contemporary academic landscape in Europe, wherein scholarly investigations, which refuse simplistic vilifications of Palestinian resistance and instead seek a deeper engagement with local perspectives, are increasingly marginalised.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 5","pages":"1615-1637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aid as Pacification: The Encroachment of Counterterrorism Clauses into the Aid Regime of the European Union in the Occupied Palestinian Territories\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Salameh-Puvogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article engages the European Union's (EU) implementation of counterterrorism clauses as part of its development aid regulations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). The point of departure for the research is the shift in the EU's policy for aid regulations in the OPT in 2019, when the EU began to gradually implement counterterrorism clauses in its grant contracts, a measure that sparked widespread protests amongst Palestinian non-governmental organisations (NGOs), who critiqued the clauses as an explicit attempt to further pacify civil society. Situated within the realms of postcolonial theory and critical security studies, the article draws on semi-structured interviews with staff and representatives of Palestinian NGOs in the OPT in order to unpack perspectives of civil society actors who interpret the policy as an illegitimate interference with their political self-determination, in particular the internationally recognised right to resist colonial subjugation. The conceptual framework of pacification – as an inconspicuous, diffuse form of violence within liberal governance aimed at suppressing resistance to the prevailing order – aligns closely with both perspectives on the ground and postcolonial thought. As such, the article elucidates tensions between an expanding European counterterrorism regime, increasingly permeating the sphere of development aid, and perspectives of Palestinian civil society actors who discern these policies as deeply rooted in colonial paradigms. Whilst exploring these tensions, the intricate relationship between postcolonial research and allyship lingers as an underlying notion. This premise assumes heightened relevance within the contemporary academic landscape in Europe, wherein scholarly investigations, which refuse simplistic vilifications of Palestinian resistance and instead seek a deeper engagement with local perspectives, are increasingly marginalised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"1615-1637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13762\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13762\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章涉及欧盟(EU)将反恐条款作为其在巴勒斯坦被占领土(OPT)发展援助条例的一部分的实施情况。这项研究的出发点是欧盟在2019年对被占领土的援助法规政策的转变,当时欧盟开始逐步在其赠款合同中实施反恐条款,这一措施引发了巴勒斯坦非政府组织(ngo)的广泛抗议,他们批评这些条款是进一步安抚民间社会的明确企图。本文位于后殖民理论和关键安全研究领域,利用对巴勒斯坦被占领土非政府组织工作人员和代表的半结构化访谈,以揭示民间社会行动者的观点,他们将该政策解释为对其政治自决的非法干涉,特别是国际公认的抵抗殖民征服的权利。和平的概念框架——在自由主义治理中作为一种不显眼的、分散的暴力形式,旨在压制对现行秩序的抵抗——与实地观点和后殖民思想密切一致。因此,本文阐明了不断扩大的欧洲反恐政权之间的紧张关系,日益渗透到发展援助领域,以及巴勒斯坦民间社会行动者的观点,他们认为这些政策深深植根于殖民模式。在探索这些紧张关系的同时,后殖民研究与盟友关系之间的复杂关系作为一个潜在的概念挥之不去。这一前提在欧洲当代学术环境中具有高度的相关性,其中学术调查拒绝对巴勒斯坦抵抗进行简单的诽谤,而是寻求与当地观点进行更深入的接触,这越来越被边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aid as Pacification: The Encroachment of Counterterrorism Clauses into the Aid Regime of the European Union in the Occupied Palestinian Territories

The article engages the European Union's (EU) implementation of counterterrorism clauses as part of its development aid regulations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). The point of departure for the research is the shift in the EU's policy for aid regulations in the OPT in 2019, when the EU began to gradually implement counterterrorism clauses in its grant contracts, a measure that sparked widespread protests amongst Palestinian non-governmental organisations (NGOs), who critiqued the clauses as an explicit attempt to further pacify civil society. Situated within the realms of postcolonial theory and critical security studies, the article draws on semi-structured interviews with staff and representatives of Palestinian NGOs in the OPT in order to unpack perspectives of civil society actors who interpret the policy as an illegitimate interference with their political self-determination, in particular the internationally recognised right to resist colonial subjugation. The conceptual framework of pacification – as an inconspicuous, diffuse form of violence within liberal governance aimed at suppressing resistance to the prevailing order – aligns closely with both perspectives on the ground and postcolonial thought. As such, the article elucidates tensions between an expanding European counterterrorism regime, increasingly permeating the sphere of development aid, and perspectives of Palestinian civil society actors who discern these policies as deeply rooted in colonial paradigms. Whilst exploring these tensions, the intricate relationship between postcolonial research and allyship lingers as an underlying notion. This premise assumes heightened relevance within the contemporary academic landscape in Europe, wherein scholarly investigations, which refuse simplistic vilifications of Palestinian resistance and instead seek a deeper engagement with local perspectives, are increasingly marginalised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信