民粹主义意识形态的剖析:政党如何定义“人民”和“精英”

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
MAURITS J. MEIJERS, ROBERT A. HUBER, ANDREJ ZASLOVE
{"title":"民粹主义意识形态的剖析:政党如何定义“人民”和“精英”","authors":"MAURITS J. MEIJERS,&nbsp;ROBERT A. HUBER,&nbsp;ANDREJ ZASLOVE","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Populist ideology centres around a supposed clash between the ‘honest and upright people’ and the ‘evil and corrupted elite’. Yet, which groups are perceived to constitute ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’ likely varies across parties. This research note investigates which factors explain how inclusive or exclusive the conceptions of these two core groups are. Why do some parties define the people in cultural terms, whereas others rely on economic considerations? And why do some parties consider CEOs as elites, whilst others consider academics as elites? We argue that parties’ degree of populism in combination with their ideological orientation allow us to understand these dynamics. In order to investigate these questions systematically, a new wave of the Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey (POPPA) was collected in 2023. Covering 312 political parties in 31 European countries in 2023, a novel module allows us to understand how parties define ‘the people’ and ‘elites’. We find that parties' populism and host ideology are important drivers of their people/elite conceptions. The higher a party's level of populism the more exclusionary its conception of the people is. Nativism is, moreover, associated with the exclusion of societal groups on cultural grounds, while left-wing economic ideology drives the exclusion of societal groups on economic grounds. With respect to elites, populism is the most important determinant for parties' conceptions of the elite. By contrast, party ideology plays a subordinate role in parties' elite conceptions. This investigation has important implications for our understanding of populist parties, what the nature of their populist appeal is, and how they seek to mobilize in the political arena.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 4","pages":"2161-2176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anatomy of populist ideology: How political parties define ‘the people’ and ‘the elite'\",\"authors\":\"MAURITS J. MEIJERS,&nbsp;ROBERT A. HUBER,&nbsp;ANDREJ ZASLOVE\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Populist ideology centres around a supposed clash between the ‘honest and upright people’ and the ‘evil and corrupted elite’. Yet, which groups are perceived to constitute ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’ likely varies across parties. This research note investigates which factors explain how inclusive or exclusive the conceptions of these two core groups are. Why do some parties define the people in cultural terms, whereas others rely on economic considerations? And why do some parties consider CEOs as elites, whilst others consider academics as elites? We argue that parties’ degree of populism in combination with their ideological orientation allow us to understand these dynamics. In order to investigate these questions systematically, a new wave of the Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey (POPPA) was collected in 2023. Covering 312 political parties in 31 European countries in 2023, a novel module allows us to understand how parties define ‘the people’ and ‘elites’. We find that parties' populism and host ideology are important drivers of their people/elite conceptions. The higher a party's level of populism the more exclusionary its conception of the people is. Nativism is, moreover, associated with the exclusion of societal groups on cultural grounds, while left-wing economic ideology drives the exclusion of societal groups on economic grounds. With respect to elites, populism is the most important determinant for parties' conceptions of the elite. By contrast, party ideology plays a subordinate role in parties' elite conceptions. This investigation has important implications for our understanding of populist parties, what the nature of their populist appeal is, and how they seek to mobilize in the political arena.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"64 4\",\"pages\":\"2161-2176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.70026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.70026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民粹主义意识形态围绕着所谓的“诚实正直的人”和“邪恶腐败的精英”之间的冲突展开。然而,被认为构成“人民”和“精英”的群体可能因政党而异。本研究报告调查了哪些因素解释了这两个核心群体的概念是包容还是排斥。为什么一些政党从文化角度来定义人民,而另一些政党则从经济角度来定义人民?为什么一些政党认为ceo是精英,而另一些政党认为学者是精英?我们认为,政党的民粹主义程度与其意识形态取向相结合,使我们能够理解这些动态。为了系统地调查这些问题,我们于2023年收集了新一波的民粹主义和政党专家调查(POPPA)。一个新的模块涵盖了2023年31个欧洲国家的312个政党,让我们了解政党如何定义“人民”和“精英”。我们发现,政党的民粹主义和东道主意识形态是其人民/精英观念的重要驱动因素。一个政党的民粹主义程度越高,它对人民的观念就越排外。此外,本土主义与基于文化原因的社会群体排斥有关,而左翼经济意识形态则推动了基于经济原因的社会群体排斥。就精英而言,民粹主义是政党精英概念的最重要决定因素。相比之下,政党意识形态在政党精英观念中处于从属地位。这项调查对我们理解民粹主义政党、其民粹主义吸引力的本质是什么、以及他们如何在政治舞台上寻求动员具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The anatomy of populist ideology: How political parties define ‘the people’ and ‘the elite'

The anatomy of populist ideology: How political parties define ‘the people’ and ‘the elite'

The anatomy of populist ideology: How political parties define ‘the people’ and ‘the elite'

The anatomy of populist ideology: How political parties define ‘the people’ and ‘the elite'

Populist ideology centres around a supposed clash between the ‘honest and upright people’ and the ‘evil and corrupted elite’. Yet, which groups are perceived to constitute ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’ likely varies across parties. This research note investigates which factors explain how inclusive or exclusive the conceptions of these two core groups are. Why do some parties define the people in cultural terms, whereas others rely on economic considerations? And why do some parties consider CEOs as elites, whilst others consider academics as elites? We argue that parties’ degree of populism in combination with their ideological orientation allow us to understand these dynamics. In order to investigate these questions systematically, a new wave of the Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey (POPPA) was collected in 2023. Covering 312 political parties in 31 European countries in 2023, a novel module allows us to understand how parties define ‘the people’ and ‘elites’. We find that parties' populism and host ideology are important drivers of their people/elite conceptions. The higher a party's level of populism the more exclusionary its conception of the people is. Nativism is, moreover, associated with the exclusion of societal groups on cultural grounds, while left-wing economic ideology drives the exclusion of societal groups on economic grounds. With respect to elites, populism is the most important determinant for parties' conceptions of the elite. By contrast, party ideology plays a subordinate role in parties' elite conceptions. This investigation has important implications for our understanding of populist parties, what the nature of their populist appeal is, and how they seek to mobilize in the political arena.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信