Jiachen Li , Hu Zhang , Raúl López-Lozano , Marie Weiss , Chenpeng Gu , Faisal Mumtaz , Jing Li , Qinhuo Liu , Junhua Bai , Xue Liu , Junyong Fang
{"title":"3D模型能否提高利用无人机和sentinel-2数据估算叶片叶绿素含量的精度?","authors":"Jiachen Li , Hu Zhang , Raúl López-Lozano , Marie Weiss , Chenpeng Gu , Faisal Mumtaz , Jing Li , Qinhuo Liu , Junhua Bai , Xue Liu , Junyong Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial parameter reflecting vegetation’s photosynthetic activity. Many LCC inversion algorithms based on satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data have been developed in recent decades. The one-dimensional radiative transfer model, like PROSAIL (1D model), has been a classic tool for LCC inversion. In recent years, three-dimensional radiative transfer models (3D model) have been developed rapidly. However, studies on 3D models for LCC inversion are limited, and their impact on inversion accuracy across different sensor resolutions remains unclear. This study focuses on winter wheat and integrates the DART, Adel-Wheat, and PROSPECT models to construct the 3D-model-derived look-up table (LUT). The 3D-model-based LUT and 1D-model-based LUT were applied to Sentinel-2 (S2) and UAV data to retrieve LCC. Validation results demonstrate that the 3D-model-based algorithm significantly improves LCC inversion accuracy for both S2 and UAV images. For UAV data, the root mean square error (RMSE) decreases from 9.90 μg/cm<sup>2</sup> to 7.97 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) improves from 0.70 to 0.79. For S2 data, the RMSE decreases from 12.40 μg/cm<sup>2</sup> to 8.68 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, while R<sup>2</sup> increases from 0.66 to 0.85. Additionally, overestimation at low LAI levels and underestimation at high LCC levels are effectively reduced. The high accuracy achieved under varying LAI and LCC conditions allows the 3D model to capture temporal trends throughout the growing season better. The 3D-model-based LCC inversion algorithm can better utilize the high spatial resolution advantages, thereby playing a significant role in vegetation physiological monitoring and crop phenotyping.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104810"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can 3D model improve the accuracy of leaf chlorophyll content estimation using UAV and sentinel-2 data?\",\"authors\":\"Jiachen Li , Hu Zhang , Raúl López-Lozano , Marie Weiss , Chenpeng Gu , Faisal Mumtaz , Jing Li , Qinhuo Liu , Junhua Bai , Xue Liu , Junyong Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial parameter reflecting vegetation’s photosynthetic activity. Many LCC inversion algorithms based on satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data have been developed in recent decades. The one-dimensional radiative transfer model, like PROSAIL (1D model), has been a classic tool for LCC inversion. In recent years, three-dimensional radiative transfer models (3D model) have been developed rapidly. However, studies on 3D models for LCC inversion are limited, and their impact on inversion accuracy across different sensor resolutions remains unclear. This study focuses on winter wheat and integrates the DART, Adel-Wheat, and PROSPECT models to construct the 3D-model-derived look-up table (LUT). The 3D-model-based LUT and 1D-model-based LUT were applied to Sentinel-2 (S2) and UAV data to retrieve LCC. Validation results demonstrate that the 3D-model-based algorithm significantly improves LCC inversion accuracy for both S2 and UAV images. For UAV data, the root mean square error (RMSE) decreases from 9.90 μg/cm<sup>2</sup> to 7.97 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) improves from 0.70 to 0.79. For S2 data, the RMSE decreases from 12.40 μg/cm<sup>2</sup> to 8.68 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>, while R<sup>2</sup> increases from 0.66 to 0.85. Additionally, overestimation at low LAI levels and underestimation at high LCC levels are effectively reduced. The high accuracy achieved under varying LAI and LCC conditions allows the 3D model to capture temporal trends throughout the growing season better. The 3D-model-based LCC inversion algorithm can better utilize the high spatial resolution advantages, thereby playing a significant role in vegetation physiological monitoring and crop phenotyping.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can 3D model improve the accuracy of leaf chlorophyll content estimation using UAV and sentinel-2 data?
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial parameter reflecting vegetation’s photosynthetic activity. Many LCC inversion algorithms based on satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data have been developed in recent decades. The one-dimensional radiative transfer model, like PROSAIL (1D model), has been a classic tool for LCC inversion. In recent years, three-dimensional radiative transfer models (3D model) have been developed rapidly. However, studies on 3D models for LCC inversion are limited, and their impact on inversion accuracy across different sensor resolutions remains unclear. This study focuses on winter wheat and integrates the DART, Adel-Wheat, and PROSPECT models to construct the 3D-model-derived look-up table (LUT). The 3D-model-based LUT and 1D-model-based LUT were applied to Sentinel-2 (S2) and UAV data to retrieve LCC. Validation results demonstrate that the 3D-model-based algorithm significantly improves LCC inversion accuracy for both S2 and UAV images. For UAV data, the root mean square error (RMSE) decreases from 9.90 μg/cm2 to 7.97 μg/cm2, and the coefficient of determination (R2) improves from 0.70 to 0.79. For S2 data, the RMSE decreases from 12.40 μg/cm2 to 8.68 μg/cm2, while R2 increases from 0.66 to 0.85. Additionally, overestimation at low LAI levels and underestimation at high LCC levels are effectively reduced. The high accuracy achieved under varying LAI and LCC conditions allows the 3D model to capture temporal trends throughout the growing season better. The 3D-model-based LCC inversion algorithm can better utilize the high spatial resolution advantages, thereby playing a significant role in vegetation physiological monitoring and crop phenotyping.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.