奥地利没有酷男:奥地利气候变化怀疑论者的决定因素

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Susanne Bolte, Johannes Klackl, Jochim Hansen, Eva Jonas, Isabella Uhl-Hädicke
{"title":"奥地利没有酷男:奥地利气候变化怀疑论者的决定因素","authors":"Susanne Bolte,&nbsp;Johannes Klackl,&nbsp;Jochim Hansen,&nbsp;Eva Jonas,&nbsp;Isabella Uhl-Hädicke","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the United States, conservative white men are demonstrably more skeptical about climate change than other adults, earning them the label “Cool Dudes.” Cool Dudes who self-reported understand climate change very well (i.e., high subjective climate literacy) are particularly skeptical about it. We investigated the existence of a similar effect in Austria using a representative survey study (<em>N</em> = 2185). We measured and regressed climate change skepticism on participants' gender, age, education, political orientation, self-reported knowledge of climate change, and subjective climate literacy. We found no evidence of a Cool Dude-like pattern in Austria. Men were not significantly more climate-skeptical than women, regardless of their political orientation. Nevertheless, climate skeptics were older, more conservative, and less educated and more often stated that they were not well-informed about climate change. High subjective climate literacy was associated with higher skepticism about climate change among conservatives yet lower skepticism among liberals. High subjective climate literacy was also associated with higher skepticism among those not informed about climate change. These results underline the importance of political orientation, information seeking, and subjective climate literacy, but not gender, for predicting climate change skepticism in Austria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102733"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No cool dudes in Austria: Determinants of Austrian climate change skepticism\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Bolte,&nbsp;Johannes Klackl,&nbsp;Jochim Hansen,&nbsp;Eva Jonas,&nbsp;Isabella Uhl-Hädicke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the United States, conservative white men are demonstrably more skeptical about climate change than other adults, earning them the label “Cool Dudes.” Cool Dudes who self-reported understand climate change very well (i.e., high subjective climate literacy) are particularly skeptical about it. We investigated the existence of a similar effect in Austria using a representative survey study (<em>N</em> = 2185). We measured and regressed climate change skepticism on participants' gender, age, education, political orientation, self-reported knowledge of climate change, and subjective climate literacy. We found no evidence of a Cool Dude-like pattern in Austria. Men were not significantly more climate-skeptical than women, regardless of their political orientation. Nevertheless, climate skeptics were older, more conservative, and less educated and more often stated that they were not well-informed about climate change. High subjective climate literacy was associated with higher skepticism about climate change among conservatives yet lower skepticism among liberals. High subjective climate literacy was also associated with higher skepticism among those not informed about climate change. These results underline the importance of political orientation, information seeking, and subjective climate literacy, but not gender, for predicting climate change skepticism in Austria.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002166\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,保守的白人男性显然比其他成年人更怀疑气候变化,因此他们被称为“酷家伙”。那些自称非常了解气候变化(即主观气候素养高)的“酷家伙”对此尤其持怀疑态度。我们利用一项代表性调查研究(N = 2185)调查了奥地利是否存在类似的效应。我们对参与者的性别、年龄、教育程度、政治取向、自我报告的气候变化知识和主观气候素养进行了测量和回归。我们在奥地利没有发现类似酷哥模式的证据。无论政治倾向如何,男性对气候变化的怀疑程度并不明显高于女性。然而,气候怀疑论者年龄更大,更保守,受教育程度更低,而且更经常表示他们对气候变化了解不足。较高的主观气候素养与保守派对气候变化的高度怀疑有关,而自由派的怀疑程度较低。高主观气候素养也与那些不了解气候变化的人持更高的怀疑态度有关。这些结果强调了政治取向、信息寻求和主观气候素养(而非性别)对于预测奥地利气候变化怀疑主义的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No cool dudes in Austria: Determinants of Austrian climate change skepticism
In the United States, conservative white men are demonstrably more skeptical about climate change than other adults, earning them the label “Cool Dudes.” Cool Dudes who self-reported understand climate change very well (i.e., high subjective climate literacy) are particularly skeptical about it. We investigated the existence of a similar effect in Austria using a representative survey study (N = 2185). We measured and regressed climate change skepticism on participants' gender, age, education, political orientation, self-reported knowledge of climate change, and subjective climate literacy. We found no evidence of a Cool Dude-like pattern in Austria. Men were not significantly more climate-skeptical than women, regardless of their political orientation. Nevertheless, climate skeptics were older, more conservative, and less educated and more often stated that they were not well-informed about climate change. High subjective climate literacy was associated with higher skepticism about climate change among conservatives yet lower skepticism among liberals. High subjective climate literacy was also associated with higher skepticism among those not informed about climate change. These results underline the importance of political orientation, information seeking, and subjective climate literacy, but not gender, for predicting climate change skepticism in Austria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信