在护理教育中使用课程资源来教授不同的病人护理:一篇论述性论文

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Amanda L. Gromer MSN, RN, CNEn, Steven R. Chesnut PhD, Sarah E. Patel PhD, RN, C-EFM
{"title":"在护理教育中使用课程资源来教授不同的病人护理:一篇论述性论文","authors":"Amanda L. Gromer MSN, RN, CNEn,&nbsp;Steven R. Chesnut PhD,&nbsp;Sarah E. Patel PhD, RN, C-EFM","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This article discusses textbooks and open educational resources (OER) used in nursing education, and their effectiveness in representing care of diverse populations to provide educators with an objective comparison for selection of materials.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this discursive article is to discuss publisher textbooks and OER used in nursing education and their effectiveness in representing diverse patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Textbooks and OER were compared and evaluated for their overall representation of diverse populations. Data sources included published articles from CINAHL, EBSCOHost, and PubMed (publication dates from 2016 or later).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both resources provide unique benefits but have limitations. Terminology misuse and a lack of representation were noted throughout both resources. When outdated information is used to teach nursing students about diverse patient care, bias is introduced, leading to poor patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is not a superior resource for representation of diverse populations. Integrating content from both resources could strengthen students' learning while overcoming some of the deficits associated when limited to one resource. Using outdated resources can lead to knowledge deficits on diverse patient care. Educators involved in selecting resources should evaluate them for accuracy and address any gaps to best prepare students to deliver inclusive care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curricular resources used in nursing education to teach diverse patient care: A discursive paper\",\"authors\":\"Amanda L. Gromer MSN, RN, CNEn,&nbsp;Steven R. Chesnut PhD,&nbsp;Sarah E. Patel PhD, RN, C-EFM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This article discusses textbooks and open educational resources (OER) used in nursing education, and their effectiveness in representing care of diverse populations to provide educators with an objective comparison for selection of materials.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this discursive article is to discuss publisher textbooks and OER used in nursing education and their effectiveness in representing diverse patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Textbooks and OER were compared and evaluated for their overall representation of diverse populations. Data sources included published articles from CINAHL, EBSCOHost, and PubMed (publication dates from 2016 or later).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both resources provide unique benefits but have limitations. Terminology misuse and a lack of representation were noted throughout both resources. When outdated information is used to teach nursing students about diverse patient care, bias is introduced, leading to poor patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is not a superior resource for representation of diverse populations. Integrating content from both resources could strengthen students' learning while overcoming some of the deficits associated when limited to one resource. Using outdated resources can lead to knowledge deficits on diverse patient care. Educators involved in selecting resources should evaluate them for accuracy and address any gaps to best prepare students to deliver inclusive care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325001279\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325001279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了教科书和开放教育资源(OER)在护理教育中的应用,以及它们在代表不同人群护理方面的有效性,为教育者选择材料提供了客观的比较。目的:本文的目的是讨论在护理教育中使用的出版商教科书和OER及其在代表不同患者护理方面的有效性。方法比较和评价教材和OER对不同人群的总体代表性。数据来源包括来自CINAHL、EBSCOHost和PubMed的已发表文章(发布日期为2016年或之后)。结果两种资源都有各自的优势,但也有局限性。在这两份资源中都注意到术语滥用和缺乏代表性。当使用过时的信息来教授护理学生不同的患者护理时,就会引入偏见,导致患者预后不良。结论没有更好的资源来代表不同的人群。整合两种资源的内容可以加强学生的学习,同时克服局限于一种资源时的一些缺陷。使用过时的资源可能导致对各种患者护理的知识不足。参与选择资源的教育工作者应该评估它们的准确性,并解决任何差距,以最好地为学生提供包容性护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Curricular resources used in nursing education to teach diverse patient care: A discursive paper

Background

This article discusses textbooks and open educational resources (OER) used in nursing education, and their effectiveness in representing care of diverse populations to provide educators with an objective comparison for selection of materials.

Purpose

The purpose of this discursive article is to discuss publisher textbooks and OER used in nursing education and their effectiveness in representing diverse patient care.

Method

Textbooks and OER were compared and evaluated for their overall representation of diverse populations. Data sources included published articles from CINAHL, EBSCOHost, and PubMed (publication dates from 2016 or later).

Results

Both resources provide unique benefits but have limitations. Terminology misuse and a lack of representation were noted throughout both resources. When outdated information is used to teach nursing students about diverse patient care, bias is introduced, leading to poor patient outcomes.

Conclusions

There is not a superior resource for representation of diverse populations. Integrating content from both resources could strengthen students' learning while overcoming some of the deficits associated when limited to one resource. Using outdated resources can lead to knowledge deficits on diverse patient care. Educators involved in selecting resources should evaluate them for accuracy and address any gaps to best prepare students to deliver inclusive care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信