口腔局部麻醉的最新进展

Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan , Rabindra Pratap Singh , Jordan Prince , Amanda Vincci Chiu , Hassan El-Awour
{"title":"口腔局部麻醉的最新进展","authors":"Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan ,&nbsp;Rabindra Pratap Singh ,&nbsp;Jordan Prince ,&nbsp;Amanda Vincci Chiu ,&nbsp;Hassan El-Awour","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving profound local anaesthesia (LA) is a vital skill for oral surgeons, enabling efficient and successful completion of surgical procedures. Recent advances in LA administration aim to enhance patient comfort, improve clinician satisfaction, and increase anaesthetic efficacy.</div><div>This review examines the evidence on emerging techniques, including vibrotactile devices, computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery (CCLAD), single-tooth anaesthesia, intraosseous injections, needleless systems, and buffered LA solutions, comparing them to conventional syringe techniques.</div><div>The evidence for these devices and techniques is mixed, with some trials reporting reduced pain or anxiety and increased speed of onset or anaesthesia success in teeth with pulpitis, while other trials report no significant differences compared to conventional syringes. Many of the trials had small sample sizes with high risk of bias, highlighting the need for large scale randomised controlled trials to better establish efficacy of these novel devices. Clinicians should weigh the available evidence alongside their own and patients’ preferences before considering new LA equipment. Emerging techniques hold promise but require further validation to ensure consistent and reliable outcomes in surgical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent advances in dental local anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan ,&nbsp;Rabindra Pratap Singh ,&nbsp;Jordan Prince ,&nbsp;Amanda Vincci Chiu ,&nbsp;Hassan El-Awour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving profound local anaesthesia (LA) is a vital skill for oral surgeons, enabling efficient and successful completion of surgical procedures. Recent advances in LA administration aim to enhance patient comfort, improve clinician satisfaction, and increase anaesthetic efficacy.</div><div>This review examines the evidence on emerging techniques, including vibrotactile devices, computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery (CCLAD), single-tooth anaesthesia, intraosseous injections, needleless systems, and buffered LA solutions, comparing them to conventional syringe techniques.</div><div>The evidence for these devices and techniques is mixed, with some trials reporting reduced pain or anxiety and increased speed of onset or anaesthesia success in teeth with pulpitis, while other trials report no significant differences compared to conventional syringes. Many of the trials had small sample sizes with high risk of bias, highlighting the need for large scale randomised controlled trials to better establish efficacy of these novel devices. Clinicians should weigh the available evidence alongside their own and patients’ preferences before considering new LA equipment. Emerging techniques hold promise but require further validation to ensure consistent and reliable outcomes in surgical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147625000615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147625000615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现深度局部麻醉(LA)是口腔外科医生的一项重要技能,可以有效和成功地完成外科手术。最近的进展是为了提高病人的舒适度,提高临床医生的满意度,提高麻醉效果。这篇综述检查了新兴技术的证据,包括振动触觉装置、计算机控制的局部麻醉输送(CCLAD)、单齿麻醉、骨内注射、无针系统和缓冲LA解决方案,并将它们与传统的注射器技术进行了比较。这些设备和技术的证据好坏参半,一些试验报告减少了牙髓炎牙齿的疼痛或焦虑,加快了发作或麻醉成功的速度,而其他试验报告与传统注射器相比没有显著差异。许多试验样本量小,偏倚风险高,强调需要进行大规模随机对照试验,以更好地确定这些新型设备的功效。在考虑新的LA设备之前,临床医生应该权衡现有的证据以及他们自己和患者的偏好。新兴技术有希望,但需要进一步验证,以确保在外科实践中一致和可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent advances in dental local anaesthesia
Achieving profound local anaesthesia (LA) is a vital skill for oral surgeons, enabling efficient and successful completion of surgical procedures. Recent advances in LA administration aim to enhance patient comfort, improve clinician satisfaction, and increase anaesthetic efficacy.
This review examines the evidence on emerging techniques, including vibrotactile devices, computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery (CCLAD), single-tooth anaesthesia, intraosseous injections, needleless systems, and buffered LA solutions, comparing them to conventional syringe techniques.
The evidence for these devices and techniques is mixed, with some trials reporting reduced pain or anxiety and increased speed of onset or anaesthesia success in teeth with pulpitis, while other trials report no significant differences compared to conventional syringes. Many of the trials had small sample sizes with high risk of bias, highlighting the need for large scale randomised controlled trials to better establish efficacy of these novel devices. Clinicians should weigh the available evidence alongside their own and patients’ preferences before considering new LA equipment. Emerging techniques hold promise but require further validation to ensure consistent and reliable outcomes in surgical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信