基于卫星InSAR和地形数据的桥梁长期位移监测

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Daniel Tonelli, Mattia Zini, Lucia Simeoni, Alfredo Rocca, Daniele Perissin, Daniele Zonta
{"title":"基于卫星InSAR和地形数据的桥梁长期位移监测","authors":"Daniel Tonelli,&nbsp;Mattia Zini,&nbsp;Lucia Simeoni,&nbsp;Alfredo Rocca,&nbsp;Daniele Perissin,&nbsp;Daniele Zonta","doi":"10.1155/stc/2106133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the effectiveness of different monitoring strategies for estimating bridge displacement trends induced by landslides, with a focus on addressing three key questions: (i) Can bridge displacement trends induced by a landslide be monitored using only 1D displacement time series along the satellite line of sight (LOS), as provided by InSAR? (ii) How do InSAR-derived displacement trend estimates differ from those obtained through traditional topographic monitoring? (iii) Can a data fusion approach, integrating both InSAR and topographic data, provide more accurate results than using either method alone? Topographic monitoring, which offers direct three-dimensional measurements, is used as the “ground truth” for evaluating the accuracy of InSAR and data fusion methods. The results show that, even though only SAR images from a single orbital geometry are available, InSAR can provide reasonably accurate estimates along the slope-aligned direction, while it is less effective in capturing transverse displacements due to the limitations of measuring along the satellite’s LOS. However, when combined with prior knowledge of landslide behavior, InSAR still provides valuable insights. Bayesian data fusion, which integrates topographic and InSAR measurements, significantly reduces uncertainties, particularly in short monitoring periods, offering a cost-effective alternative to continuous topographic monitoring. Additionally, this study explores two alternative strategies: limiting topographic measurements to the first year and spreading sparse topographic measurements over several years and relying on satellite data thereafter. While both approaches yield satisfactory results in the slope direction, they show higher uncertainties in the transvers direction, particularly as the frequency of topographic measurements decreases. The findings suggest that a combined monitoring approach, integrating satellite and topographic data, as well as a prior knowledge of landslide behavior, provides an accurate and cost-effective solution for long-term monitoring of infrastructure in landslide-prone areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/2106133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Satellite InSAR and Topographic Data for Long-Term Displacement Monitoring of Bridge Crossing Slow-Moving Landslides\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Tonelli,&nbsp;Mattia Zini,&nbsp;Lucia Simeoni,&nbsp;Alfredo Rocca,&nbsp;Daniele Perissin,&nbsp;Daniele Zonta\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/stc/2106133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the effectiveness of different monitoring strategies for estimating bridge displacement trends induced by landslides, with a focus on addressing three key questions: (i) Can bridge displacement trends induced by a landslide be monitored using only 1D displacement time series along the satellite line of sight (LOS), as provided by InSAR? (ii) How do InSAR-derived displacement trend estimates differ from those obtained through traditional topographic monitoring? (iii) Can a data fusion approach, integrating both InSAR and topographic data, provide more accurate results than using either method alone? Topographic monitoring, which offers direct three-dimensional measurements, is used as the “ground truth” for evaluating the accuracy of InSAR and data fusion methods. The results show that, even though only SAR images from a single orbital geometry are available, InSAR can provide reasonably accurate estimates along the slope-aligned direction, while it is less effective in capturing transverse displacements due to the limitations of measuring along the satellite’s LOS. However, when combined with prior knowledge of landslide behavior, InSAR still provides valuable insights. Bayesian data fusion, which integrates topographic and InSAR measurements, significantly reduces uncertainties, particularly in short monitoring periods, offering a cost-effective alternative to continuous topographic monitoring. Additionally, this study explores two alternative strategies: limiting topographic measurements to the first year and spreading sparse topographic measurements over several years and relying on satellite data thereafter. While both approaches yield satisfactory results in the slope direction, they show higher uncertainties in the transvers direction, particularly as the frequency of topographic measurements decreases. The findings suggest that a combined monitoring approach, integrating satellite and topographic data, as well as a prior knowledge of landslide behavior, provides an accurate and cost-effective solution for long-term monitoring of infrastructure in landslide-prone areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/2106133\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/2106133\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/2106133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了不同监测策略在估计滑坡引起的桥梁位移趋势方面的有效性,重点关注三个关键问题:(i)能否仅使用InSAR提供的沿卫星视线(LOS)的一维位移时间序列来监测滑坡引起的桥梁位移趋势?insar得出的位移趋势估计值与通过传统地形监测获得的估计值有何不同?(iii)整合InSAR和地形数据的数据融合方法是否比单独使用任何一种方法提供更准确的结果?地形监测提供直接的三维测量,被用作评估InSAR和数据融合方法精度的“地面真相”。结果表明,即使只有来自单一轨道几何形状的SAR图像可用,InSAR也可以沿着斜坡对准的方向提供相当准确的估计,而由于沿卫星LOS测量的限制,它在捕获横向位移方面效果较差。然而,当与滑坡行为的先验知识相结合时,InSAR仍然提供了有价值的见解。贝叶斯数据融合集成了地形和InSAR测量,显著降低了不确定性,特别是在短监测周期内,为连续地形监测提供了经济有效的替代方案。此外,本研究还探讨了两种替代策略:将地形测量限制在第一年,将稀疏地形测量扩展到几年,此后依赖卫星数据。虽然这两种方法在斜坡方向上都得到了令人满意的结果,但它们在横向方向上表现出更高的不确定性,特别是当地形测量频率降低时。研究结果表明,结合卫星和地形数据以及对滑坡行为的先验知识的综合监测方法,为滑坡易发地区的基础设施的长期监测提供了准确和经济有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrating Satellite InSAR and Topographic Data for Long-Term Displacement Monitoring of Bridge Crossing Slow-Moving Landslides

Integrating Satellite InSAR and Topographic Data for Long-Term Displacement Monitoring of Bridge Crossing Slow-Moving Landslides

This study investigates the effectiveness of different monitoring strategies for estimating bridge displacement trends induced by landslides, with a focus on addressing three key questions: (i) Can bridge displacement trends induced by a landslide be monitored using only 1D displacement time series along the satellite line of sight (LOS), as provided by InSAR? (ii) How do InSAR-derived displacement trend estimates differ from those obtained through traditional topographic monitoring? (iii) Can a data fusion approach, integrating both InSAR and topographic data, provide more accurate results than using either method alone? Topographic monitoring, which offers direct three-dimensional measurements, is used as the “ground truth” for evaluating the accuracy of InSAR and data fusion methods. The results show that, even though only SAR images from a single orbital geometry are available, InSAR can provide reasonably accurate estimates along the slope-aligned direction, while it is less effective in capturing transverse displacements due to the limitations of measuring along the satellite’s LOS. However, when combined with prior knowledge of landslide behavior, InSAR still provides valuable insights. Bayesian data fusion, which integrates topographic and InSAR measurements, significantly reduces uncertainties, particularly in short monitoring periods, offering a cost-effective alternative to continuous topographic monitoring. Additionally, this study explores two alternative strategies: limiting topographic measurements to the first year and spreading sparse topographic measurements over several years and relying on satellite data thereafter. While both approaches yield satisfactory results in the slope direction, they show higher uncertainties in the transvers direction, particularly as the frequency of topographic measurements decreases. The findings suggest that a combined monitoring approach, integrating satellite and topographic data, as well as a prior knowledge of landslide behavior, provides an accurate and cost-effective solution for long-term monitoring of infrastructure in landslide-prone areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Control & Health Monitoring
Structural Control & Health Monitoring 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
234
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications. Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics. Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信