{"title":"新数据库中的老骨头:人类学中种族、统计和祖先估计的历史见解","authors":"Iris Clever, Lisette Jong","doi":"10.1111/aman.28095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the persistence of race in biological anthropology, particularly in the context of ancestry estimation using the Fordisc software. Despite efforts to move away from race-based typologies since the mid-20th century, historical notions of race continue to shape scientific methods and technologies in anthropology. By tracing the “data journey” of a skeletal collection within Fordisc's database, we reveal how early 20th-century race science shaped statistical methods used in contemporary anthropology and how typological notions of race persist today. Our interdisciplinary approach, combining history of science and science and technology studies, highlights the need to historicize and critically examine the methods and technologies that underpin anthropological practices. This analysis demonstrates that issues of race in science are deeply rooted in the material practices of data collection, analysis, and statistical methods. Recognizing and dismantling these legacies is central to creating more ethical scientific practices. We argue that addressing the trouble with race in anthropology requires a comprehensive reevaluation of scientific practices, its methods and technologies, and would benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration within anthropology and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"127 3","pages":"566-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.28095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Old Bones in New Databases: Historical Insights Into Race, Statistics, and Ancestry Estimation in Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Iris Clever, Lisette Jong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aman.28095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores the persistence of race in biological anthropology, particularly in the context of ancestry estimation using the Fordisc software. Despite efforts to move away from race-based typologies since the mid-20th century, historical notions of race continue to shape scientific methods and technologies in anthropology. By tracing the “data journey” of a skeletal collection within Fordisc's database, we reveal how early 20th-century race science shaped statistical methods used in contemporary anthropology and how typological notions of race persist today. Our interdisciplinary approach, combining history of science and science and technology studies, highlights the need to historicize and critically examine the methods and technologies that underpin anthropological practices. This analysis demonstrates that issues of race in science are deeply rooted in the material practices of data collection, analysis, and statistical methods. Recognizing and dismantling these legacies is central to creating more ethical scientific practices. We argue that addressing the trouble with race in anthropology requires a comprehensive reevaluation of scientific practices, its methods and technologies, and would benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration within anthropology and beyond.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"volume\":\"127 3\",\"pages\":\"566-580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.28095\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.28095\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.28095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Old Bones in New Databases: Historical Insights Into Race, Statistics, and Ancestry Estimation in Anthropology
This article explores the persistence of race in biological anthropology, particularly in the context of ancestry estimation using the Fordisc software. Despite efforts to move away from race-based typologies since the mid-20th century, historical notions of race continue to shape scientific methods and technologies in anthropology. By tracing the “data journey” of a skeletal collection within Fordisc's database, we reveal how early 20th-century race science shaped statistical methods used in contemporary anthropology and how typological notions of race persist today. Our interdisciplinary approach, combining history of science and science and technology studies, highlights the need to historicize and critically examine the methods and technologies that underpin anthropological practices. This analysis demonstrates that issues of race in science are deeply rooted in the material practices of data collection, analysis, and statistical methods. Recognizing and dismantling these legacies is central to creating more ethical scientific practices. We argue that addressing the trouble with race in anthropology requires a comprehensive reevaluation of scientific practices, its methods and technologies, and would benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration within anthropology and beyond.
期刊介绍:
American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.