{"title":"前言:作为全球政治的母语","authors":"Jessica Sujata Chandras, Joshua Babcock","doi":"10.1111/aman.28082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For racialized speakers living in the wake of colonial modernity, “mother tongues” persist as perilous, precarious terrain. Far from being a straightforward linguistic resource or a totalizing, self-evident identity marker, “mother tongue” is always positioned, partial, and political. As a category, “mother tongue” encompasses projects across disparate sites, histories, and interactional grounds beyond South Asia, where the concept has been most extensively elaborated. Articles in this collection trace the links among collective national identities, individuated personhood, and the denotational codes that get made to refract language-community attentions—not just a group's language, but more essentially, their “mother tongue.” What transformations, investments, anxieties, blockages, and affinities are necessary to enable these languages’ continued, ambivalent existence as being as close as one's “mother”? How do raciolinguistic and raciosemiotic performances of personhood come to feel natural through “mother tongues,” especially in cases where the connection (or the language) is constructed as broken, severed, corrupted, or irrevocably lost? Together, we explore mobilizations of “mother tongue” as a technology of commensuration: a tool and technique through which myriad and shifting political claims get made with, through, against, and beyond global projects of value-creation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"127 3","pages":"611-617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Mother Tongue as Global Politics\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Sujata Chandras, Joshua Babcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aman.28082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>For racialized speakers living in the wake of colonial modernity, “mother tongues” persist as perilous, precarious terrain. Far from being a straightforward linguistic resource or a totalizing, self-evident identity marker, “mother tongue” is always positioned, partial, and political. As a category, “mother tongue” encompasses projects across disparate sites, histories, and interactional grounds beyond South Asia, where the concept has been most extensively elaborated. Articles in this collection trace the links among collective national identities, individuated personhood, and the denotational codes that get made to refract language-community attentions—not just a group's language, but more essentially, their “mother tongue.” What transformations, investments, anxieties, blockages, and affinities are necessary to enable these languages’ continued, ambivalent existence as being as close as one's “mother”? How do raciolinguistic and raciosemiotic performances of personhood come to feel natural through “mother tongues,” especially in cases where the connection (or the language) is constructed as broken, severed, corrupted, or irrevocably lost? Together, we explore mobilizations of “mother tongue” as a technology of commensuration: a tool and technique through which myriad and shifting political claims get made with, through, against, and beyond global projects of value-creation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"volume\":\"127 3\",\"pages\":\"611-617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.28082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.28082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
For racialized speakers living in the wake of colonial modernity, “mother tongues” persist as perilous, precarious terrain. Far from being a straightforward linguistic resource or a totalizing, self-evident identity marker, “mother tongue” is always positioned, partial, and political. As a category, “mother tongue” encompasses projects across disparate sites, histories, and interactional grounds beyond South Asia, where the concept has been most extensively elaborated. Articles in this collection trace the links among collective national identities, individuated personhood, and the denotational codes that get made to refract language-community attentions—not just a group's language, but more essentially, their “mother tongue.” What transformations, investments, anxieties, blockages, and affinities are necessary to enable these languages’ continued, ambivalent existence as being as close as one's “mother”? How do raciolinguistic and raciosemiotic performances of personhood come to feel natural through “mother tongues,” especially in cases where the connection (or the language) is constructed as broken, severed, corrupted, or irrevocably lost? Together, we explore mobilizations of “mother tongue” as a technology of commensuration: a tool and technique through which myriad and shifting political claims get made with, through, against, and beyond global projects of value-creation.
期刊介绍:
American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.