Benjamin Walters BS , Hanna B. Short BS , Nigel Ravida BS , Maria Fabe BS , Susan Boehmer MS , Lilia Reyes MD
{"title":"评估过敏反应后肾上腺素管理观察期状态的实践模式","authors":"Benjamin Walters BS , Hanna B. Short BS , Nigel Ravida BS , Maria Fabe BS , Susan Boehmer MS , Lilia Reyes MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening emergency requiring use of epinephrine and subsequent observation period. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) suggests that patients with resolved anaphylaxis should be observed for at least 4–6 h to monitor for biphasic reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Study Objectives</h3><div>The primary objective was to investigate practice patterns in observation time in the emergency department (ED) for anaphylaxis after epinephrine administration. Secondary objectives included the adjunct medical management, allergens, and frequency of biphasic reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review from January 2017 to September 2022. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who presented with anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration and a documented observation period after, qualified. There were 1751 male and female patients identified; only 488 met criteria. There were 1263 patients excluded for no epinephrine administration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median number of minutes observed in the ED after epinephrine administration for all patients was 235 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 251.50–285.16, SD = 187.28); 21 patients (4.29%) experienced a biphasic reaction. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed for a median of 451.38 min (95% CI 320.29–582.47, SD = 297.99). Patients without a biphasic reaction were observed for a median of 262.13 min (95% CI 245.43–278.83, SD = 181.47, <em>p</em> < 0.05). No statistically significant relationship was found between the timing of epinephrine administration after symptom onset and frequency of biphasic reaction (<em>p</em> = 0.57).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Observation time after epinephrine administration on the index ED visit was comparable with the NIAID-suggested 4 to 6 h. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed longer than those without a biphasic reaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"77 ","pages":"Pages 69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Practice Patterns of Observation Periods Status Post Epinephrine Administration for Anaphylaxis\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Walters BS , Hanna B. Short BS , Nigel Ravida BS , Maria Fabe BS , Susan Boehmer MS , Lilia Reyes MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening emergency requiring use of epinephrine and subsequent observation period. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) suggests that patients with resolved anaphylaxis should be observed for at least 4–6 h to monitor for biphasic reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Study Objectives</h3><div>The primary objective was to investigate practice patterns in observation time in the emergency department (ED) for anaphylaxis after epinephrine administration. Secondary objectives included the adjunct medical management, allergens, and frequency of biphasic reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review from January 2017 to September 2022. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who presented with anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration and a documented observation period after, qualified. There were 1751 male and female patients identified; only 488 met criteria. There were 1263 patients excluded for no epinephrine administration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median number of minutes observed in the ED after epinephrine administration for all patients was 235 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 251.50–285.16, SD = 187.28); 21 patients (4.29%) experienced a biphasic reaction. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed for a median of 451.38 min (95% CI 320.29–582.47, SD = 297.99). Patients without a biphasic reaction were observed for a median of 262.13 min (95% CI 245.43–278.83, SD = 181.47, <em>p</em> < 0.05). No statistically significant relationship was found between the timing of epinephrine administration after symptom onset and frequency of biphasic reaction (<em>p</em> = 0.57).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Observation time after epinephrine administration on the index ED visit was comparable with the NIAID-suggested 4 to 6 h. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed longer than those without a biphasic reaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925002525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:过敏性反应是危及生命的紧急情况,需要使用肾上腺素和随后的观察期。美国国家过敏和传染病研究所(NIAID)建议,缓解过敏反应的患者应观察至少4-6小时,以监测双相反应。研究目的主要目的是调查急诊(ED)在肾上腺素治疗后过敏反应的观察时间的实践模式。次要目标包括辅助医疗管理、过敏原和双相反应的频率。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年9月的病例。≥18岁出现过敏反应需要肾上腺素给药且有记录的观察期的患者,合格。共发现男性和女性患者1751例;只有488人符合标准。1263例患者因未使用肾上腺素而被排除在外。结果所有患者肾上腺素给药后ED的中位分钟数为235 min(95%可信区间[CI] 251.50 ~ 285.16, SD = 187.28);21例(4.29%)出现双相反应。双相反应患者的中位观察时间为451.38 min (95% CI 320.29-582.47, SD = 297.99)。无双相反应的患者中位观察时间为262.13 min (95% CI 245.43-278.83, SD = 181.47, p < 0.05)。出现症状后肾上腺素给药时间与双相反应发生频率无统计学意义(p = 0.57)。结论肾上腺素给药后的观察时间与niaid建议的4 ~ 6 h相当,有双相反应的患者比无双相反应的患者观察时间更长。
Evaluating Practice Patterns of Observation Periods Status Post Epinephrine Administration for Anaphylaxis
Background
Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening emergency requiring use of epinephrine and subsequent observation period. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) suggests that patients with resolved anaphylaxis should be observed for at least 4–6 h to monitor for biphasic reactions.
Study Objectives
The primary objective was to investigate practice patterns in observation time in the emergency department (ED) for anaphylaxis after epinephrine administration. Secondary objectives included the adjunct medical management, allergens, and frequency of biphasic reactions.
Methods
A retrospective chart review from January 2017 to September 2022. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who presented with anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration and a documented observation period after, qualified. There were 1751 male and female patients identified; only 488 met criteria. There were 1263 patients excluded for no epinephrine administration.
Results
The median number of minutes observed in the ED after epinephrine administration for all patients was 235 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 251.50–285.16, SD = 187.28); 21 patients (4.29%) experienced a biphasic reaction. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed for a median of 451.38 min (95% CI 320.29–582.47, SD = 297.99). Patients without a biphasic reaction were observed for a median of 262.13 min (95% CI 245.43–278.83, SD = 181.47, p < 0.05). No statistically significant relationship was found between the timing of epinephrine administration after symptom onset and frequency of biphasic reaction (p = 0.57).
Conclusions
Observation time after epinephrine administration on the index ED visit was comparable with the NIAID-suggested 4 to 6 h. Patients with biphasic reactions were observed longer than those without a biphasic reaction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine