被术语掩盖:开环最优控制的直接方法中隐藏的相似之处

IF 3.9 2区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Susanne Sass , Alexander Mitsos
{"title":"被术语掩盖:开环最优控制的直接方法中隐藏的相似之处","authors":"Susanne Sass ,&nbsp;Alexander Mitsos","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2025.103513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active research on optimal control methods comprises the developments of research groups from various fields, including control, mathematics, and process systems engineering. Although there is a consensus on the classification of the main solution methods, different terms are often used for the same method. For example, solving optimal control problems with control discretization and embedded state integration may be called sequential method or direct single shooting. Equally severely, the same term may be used ambiguously: Is control vector parameterization a synonym for control discretization or for direct single shooting? Both misleading distinctions and ambiguity complicate the scientific discourse. Thus, we delineate standard terms from open-loop optimal control in this tutorial. More precisely, we formulate and challenge hypotheses on the terminology of direct methods, i.e., solution methods using control discretization combined with state integration and/or state discretization. In particular, we point out the parallel of the embedded state integration with a numerical integration scheme and the reduced-space formulation of approaches using state discretization. Taking a step further towards integrated scheduling and control problems, we additionally investigate the similarities and differences between the discrete-time solution of optimal control problems and optimal quasi-steady operation. In this context, we also hint on the discrete-time representation in scheduling which refers to the handling of controls rather than the handling of process dynamics. Rather than concluding with the “correct” term to use, this tutorial concludes with recommendations on how to avoid misunderstandings in the versatile research community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 103513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obscured by terminology: Hidden parallels in direct methods for open-loop optimal control\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Sass ,&nbsp;Alexander Mitsos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jprocont.2025.103513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Active research on optimal control methods comprises the developments of research groups from various fields, including control, mathematics, and process systems engineering. Although there is a consensus on the classification of the main solution methods, different terms are often used for the same method. For example, solving optimal control problems with control discretization and embedded state integration may be called sequential method or direct single shooting. Equally severely, the same term may be used ambiguously: Is control vector parameterization a synonym for control discretization or for direct single shooting? Both misleading distinctions and ambiguity complicate the scientific discourse. Thus, we delineate standard terms from open-loop optimal control in this tutorial. More precisely, we formulate and challenge hypotheses on the terminology of direct methods, i.e., solution methods using control discretization combined with state integration and/or state discretization. In particular, we point out the parallel of the embedded state integration with a numerical integration scheme and the reduced-space formulation of approaches using state discretization. Taking a step further towards integrated scheduling and control problems, we additionally investigate the similarities and differences between the discrete-time solution of optimal control problems and optimal quasi-steady operation. In this context, we also hint on the discrete-time representation in scheduling which refers to the handling of controls rather than the handling of process dynamics. Rather than concluding with the “correct” term to use, this tutorial concludes with recommendations on how to avoid misunderstandings in the versatile research community.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152425001416\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152425001416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对最优控制方法的积极研究包括来自各个领域的研究小组的发展,包括控制、数学和过程系统工程。虽然对主要解决方法的分类有共识,但同一种方法经常使用不同的术语。例如,用控制离散化和嵌入状态积分来解决最优控制问题,可称为顺序法或直接单次射击法。同样严重的是,同样的术语可能使用含糊不清:控制矢量参数化是控制离散化的同义词还是直接单次射击的同义词?误导的区分和模棱两可使科学论述复杂化。因此,我们在本教程中描述开环最优控制的标准术语。更准确地说,我们在直接方法的术语上制定和挑战假设,即使用控制离散化结合状态积分和/或状态离散化的解决方法。特别地,我们指出了嵌入式状态积分与数值积分格式的并行性,以及使用状态离散化的方法的简化空间公式。为了进一步研究综合调度和控制问题,我们还研究了最优控制问题的离散时间解与最优准稳定运行的异同。在这种情况下,我们还提示调度中的离散时间表示,它指的是对控制的处理,而不是对过程动态的处理。本教程并没有总结“正确”的术语,而是总结了如何避免在多用途的研究社区中产生误解的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obscured by terminology: Hidden parallels in direct methods for open-loop optimal control

Obscured by terminology: Hidden parallels in direct methods for open-loop optimal control
Active research on optimal control methods comprises the developments of research groups from various fields, including control, mathematics, and process systems engineering. Although there is a consensus on the classification of the main solution methods, different terms are often used for the same method. For example, solving optimal control problems with control discretization and embedded state integration may be called sequential method or direct single shooting. Equally severely, the same term may be used ambiguously: Is control vector parameterization a synonym for control discretization or for direct single shooting? Both misleading distinctions and ambiguity complicate the scientific discourse. Thus, we delineate standard terms from open-loop optimal control in this tutorial. More precisely, we formulate and challenge hypotheses on the terminology of direct methods, i.e., solution methods using control discretization combined with state integration and/or state discretization. In particular, we point out the parallel of the embedded state integration with a numerical integration scheme and the reduced-space formulation of approaches using state discretization. Taking a step further towards integrated scheduling and control problems, we additionally investigate the similarities and differences between the discrete-time solution of optimal control problems and optimal quasi-steady operation. In this context, we also hint on the discrete-time representation in scheduling which refers to the handling of controls rather than the handling of process dynamics. Rather than concluding with the “correct” term to use, this tutorial concludes with recommendations on how to avoid misunderstandings in the versatile research community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Process Control
Journal of Process Control 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
159
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others. Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques. Topics covered include: • Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信