实践改进项目:为选择性非心脏手术开发远程家庭术前评估平台

Joshua Ivare MD, MS , David N. Tryon MD , Adam K. Jacob MD , Timothy B. Curry MD, PhD , Amir Lerman MD
{"title":"实践改进项目:为选择性非心脏手术开发远程家庭术前评估平台","authors":"Joshua Ivare MD, MS ,&nbsp;David N. Tryon MD ,&nbsp;Adam K. Jacob MD ,&nbsp;Timothy B. Curry MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Amir Lerman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the feasibility, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with a remote cardiac evaluation protocol during a preanesthesia medical evaluation (PAME) before elective noncardiac surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Eligible patients undergoing elective noncardiac procedures from May 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 were selected from an anesthesia triage list at a single health care center. Patients received electronic devices for remote blood pressure measurement and 12-lead electrocardiogram collection. Patients either had a telemedicine-based PAME (tPAME) visit or an in-person PAME (iPAME) visit afterward. Patients’ charts were reviewed 30 days after procedure to identify after procedure complications. Patients were asked to provide feedback about their experiences through a digital after procedure satisfaction survey. Comparisons between the tPAME group and the iPAME group were made with χ<sup>2</sup>, Fisher exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 129 eligible patients, 48 (37.2%) participated in the study. 29 (60.4%) patients had an iPAME visit, and 19 (39.6%) patients had a tPAME visit. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events after a remote cardiac evaluation in the iPAME and the tPAME groups. One (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group developed a deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after procedure, and 1 (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group had an emergency room visit within 30 days after their procedure. Patients were very satisfied with their experience in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings support the concept that a remote cardiac evaluation during a PAME before elective noncardiac procedures is feasible, safe, and associated with high patient satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 5","pages":"Article 100657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice Improvement Project: Developing a Platform for a Remote At-Home Preoperative Evaluation for Elective Noncardiac Procedures\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Ivare MD, MS ,&nbsp;David N. Tryon MD ,&nbsp;Adam K. Jacob MD ,&nbsp;Timothy B. Curry MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Amir Lerman MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the feasibility, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with a remote cardiac evaluation protocol during a preanesthesia medical evaluation (PAME) before elective noncardiac surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Eligible patients undergoing elective noncardiac procedures from May 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 were selected from an anesthesia triage list at a single health care center. Patients received electronic devices for remote blood pressure measurement and 12-lead electrocardiogram collection. Patients either had a telemedicine-based PAME (tPAME) visit or an in-person PAME (iPAME) visit afterward. Patients’ charts were reviewed 30 days after procedure to identify after procedure complications. Patients were asked to provide feedback about their experiences through a digital after procedure satisfaction survey. Comparisons between the tPAME group and the iPAME group were made with χ<sup>2</sup>, Fisher exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 129 eligible patients, 48 (37.2%) participated in the study. 29 (60.4%) patients had an iPAME visit, and 19 (39.6%) patients had a tPAME visit. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events after a remote cardiac evaluation in the iPAME and the tPAME groups. One (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group developed a deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after procedure, and 1 (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group had an emergency room visit within 30 days after their procedure. Patients were very satisfied with their experience in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings support the concept that a remote cardiac evaluation during a PAME before elective noncardiac procedures is feasible, safe, and associated with high patient satisfaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估选择性非心脏手术前麻醉前医学评估(PAME)中远程心脏评估方案的可行性、安全性和患者满意度。患者与方法:选取于2022年5月1日至2023年9月30日在同一医疗保健中心接受选择性非心脏手术的符合条件的患者。患者使用电子设备进行远程血压测量和12导联心电图采集。患者要么进行基于远程医疗的PAME (tPAME)访问,要么随后进行亲自PAME (iPAME)访问。术后30天回顾患者的病历以确定术后并发症。患者被要求通过数字手术后满意度调查提供他们的体验反馈。tPAME组与iPAME组间比较采用χ2、Fisher精确检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。结果129例符合条件的患者中,48例(37.2%)参加了研究。iPAME访视29例(60.4%),tPAME访视19例(39.6%)。iPAME组和tPAME组在远程心脏评估后没有出现主要的心血管不良事件。iPAME组1例(3.4%)患者术后出现深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞,iPAME组1例(3.4%)患者术后30天内急诊就诊。病人对他们在研究中的经历非常满意。结论:这些研究结果支持了在选择性非心脏手术前进行PAME期间远程心脏评估是可行的、安全的,并且与高患者满意度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice Improvement Project: Developing a Platform for a Remote At-Home Preoperative Evaluation for Elective Noncardiac Procedures

Objective

To assess the feasibility, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with a remote cardiac evaluation protocol during a preanesthesia medical evaluation (PAME) before elective noncardiac surgical procedures.

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients undergoing elective noncardiac procedures from May 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023 were selected from an anesthesia triage list at a single health care center. Patients received electronic devices for remote blood pressure measurement and 12-lead electrocardiogram collection. Patients either had a telemedicine-based PAME (tPAME) visit or an in-person PAME (iPAME) visit afterward. Patients’ charts were reviewed 30 days after procedure to identify after procedure complications. Patients were asked to provide feedback about their experiences through a digital after procedure satisfaction survey. Comparisons between the tPAME group and the iPAME group were made with χ2, Fisher exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Of 129 eligible patients, 48 (37.2%) participated in the study. 29 (60.4%) patients had an iPAME visit, and 19 (39.6%) patients had a tPAME visit. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events after a remote cardiac evaluation in the iPAME and the tPAME groups. One (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group developed a deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after procedure, and 1 (3.4%) patient in the iPAME group had an emergency room visit within 30 days after their procedure. Patients were very satisfied with their experience in the study.

Conclusion

These findings support the concept that a remote cardiac evaluation during a PAME before elective noncardiac procedures is feasible, safe, and associated with high patient satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信