MAVEN、洞察号和朱戎号对火星地壳磁化尺度的约束

IF 4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
O. M. Romeo, M. Manga, R. J. Lillis, A. Mittelholz
{"title":"MAVEN、洞察号和朱戎号对火星地壳磁化尺度的约束","authors":"O. M. Romeo,&nbsp;M. Manga,&nbsp;R. J. Lillis,&nbsp;A. Mittelholz","doi":"10.1029/2025JE008986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>&lt;</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${&lt; } $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>50 km) to meso-scales (100<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${-}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\beta $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008986","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scales of Martian Crustal Magnetization Constrained by MAVEN, InSight, and Zhurong\",\"authors\":\"O. M. Romeo,&nbsp;M. Manga,&nbsp;R. J. Lillis,&nbsp;A. Mittelholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>&lt;</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${&lt; } $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>50 km) to meso-scales (100<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${-}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>1,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\beta $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008986","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然火星目前没有活跃的地球发电机,但在整个行星上都发现了残余的地壳磁化,并包含了火星磁化的起源、规模和时间的记录。由于地壳磁场与各种地质和地形特征密切相关,“洞察号”和“朱戎号”着陆点首次对火星表面磁场进行了现场测量,从而更好地限制了地表附近的磁化相干性和深度尺度。我们在两个着陆点附近建立了小尺度(< ${<}$ 50 km)到中尺度(100−${-}$ 1,000 km)的火星地壳磁化蒙特卡罗模型,以计算磁场强度的高度剖面。我们将模拟结果与Langlais等人(2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854)的地壳场模型和地表测量结果进行了比较,结果表明,与高斯模型相比,幂律分布更准确地描述了火星的海拔分布。观测结果最好的解释是分形参数β $\ β $值接近2.7,在洞察号附近相干尺度大约为250公里,在朱荣附近相干尺度更大,地壳磁化可能更厚。受这些长度尺度的激励,我们根据每个着陆器附近的地质单位创建了额外的磁化模型,将它们与火星历史的不同时期联系起来。我们的研究结果表明,根据南北两极边界附近的模拟磁化,火星历史上至少有一次极场反转。此外,我们提出火星地球发电机可能在诺亚亚晚期减弱或暂停,随后在希斯佩里安时期核心发电机恢复活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Scales of Martian Crustal Magnetization Constrained by MAVEN, InSight, and Zhurong

Scales of Martian Crustal Magnetization Constrained by MAVEN, InSight, and Zhurong

While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales ( < ${< } $ 50 km) to meso-scales (100 ${-}$ 1,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter β $\beta $ values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信