O. M. Romeo, M. Manga, R. J. Lillis, A. Mittelholz
{"title":"MAVEN、洞察号和朱戎号对火星地壳磁化尺度的约束","authors":"O. M. Romeo, M. Manga, R. J. Lillis, A. Mittelholz","doi":"10.1029/2025JE008986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo><</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${< } $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>50 km) to meso-scales (100<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${-}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>1,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\beta $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008986","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scales of Martian Crustal Magnetization Constrained by MAVEN, InSight, and Zhurong\",\"authors\":\"O. M. Romeo, M. Manga, R. J. Lillis, A. Mittelholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo><</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${< } $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>50 km) to meso-scales (100<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${-}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>1,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>β</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\beta $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008986\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008986","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scales of Martian Crustal Magnetization Constrained by MAVEN, InSight, and Zhurong
While Mars does not possess a currently active geodynamo, remanent crustal magnetization has been found across the planet and contains records of the origin, scale, and timing of Martian magnetization. The first in situ measurements of the Martian magnetic field on the planet's surface, at the InSight and Zhurong landing sites, allow for better constraints on magnetization coherence and depth scales near the surface, as crustal fields are closely related to a variety of geological and topographic features. We develop Monte Carlo models of the Martian crustal magnetization near the two landing sites on small-scales (50 km) to meso-scales (1001,000 km) to compute altitude profiles of the magnetic field intensity. We compare our simulations with the Langlais et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018je005854) crustal field model and surface measurements, indicating that power law distributions more accurately describe Martian altitude profiles compared to Gaussian models. Observations are best explained by fractal parameter values near 2.7 and coherence scales roughly 250 km near InSight, with larger coherence scales and possibly thicker crustal magnetization near Zhurong. Motivated by these length scales, we create additional magnetization models based on the geological units near each lander to relate them to different time periods of Martian history. Our results suggest at least one polar field reversal in Martian history based on the simulated magnetization near the North-South dichotomy boundary. Furthermore, we propose that the Martian geodynamo might have weakened or suspended during the late Noachian, followed by revitalization of the core dynamo during the Hesperian period.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.