Mohammad Amin Shahram, Mostafa Robatjazi, Atefeh Rostami, Vahid Shahmaei, Ramin Shahrayini, Mohammad Salari
{"title":"深度学习用于区分活跃和非活跃的多发性硬化斑块:基于mri的分类模型的比较分析","authors":"Mohammad Amin Shahram, Mostafa Robatjazi, Atefeh Rostami, Vahid Shahmaei, Ramin Shahrayini, Mohammad Salari","doi":"10.1002/ima.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease-causing neurological disability, particularly in young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective tool for detecting MS plaques, but contrast-enhanced imaging involves potential risks, including toxicity and increased imaging time. Previous methods for differentiating plaque types, such as texture analysis and manual feature extraction, face challenges such as limited datasets and poor generalizability. This study aims to develop and compare deep learning-based methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to classify MS lesion types using non-contrast MRI, aiming to improve clinical applicability and reduce reliance on contrast agents. This study involved 106 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from two MRI centers. A total of 3410 lesions were analyzed, including 1408 active and 2002 inactive lesions. MRI images, including T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium contrast (T1 + Gd(, T1, Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and T2 sequences, were acquired. The segmented lesions were converted into 2D slices and resampled to 128 × 128 pixels for deep learning input. Data augmentation and normalization were applied to improve model generalizability. A custom CNN model was developed and compared with four pre-trained models (ResNet50, VGG16, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0) using fivefold cross-validation to evaluate model performance. Performance metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were used. The custom CNN achieved 90.15% accuracy and 94.67% AUC in FLAIR, outperforming pre-trained models. DenseNet121 showed competitive results with 88.23% accuracy and 92.86% AUC in FLAIR. Non-contrast sequences (T1, T2, and FLAIR) combined with deep learning provided promising results, reducing reliance on contrast agents. The custom CNN model excelled in classifying MS lesions across multiple MRI sequences, offering improved diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Custom models for specialized datasets can enhance clinical outcomes, demonstrating the potential of deep learning in MS diagnosis. These findings suggest that deep learning models can be replaced with contrast agents in routine practice. Future research may explore combining CNNs with clinical features to enhance performance and interpretability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning for Differentiating Active and Inactive Multiple Sclerosis Plaques: A Comparative Analysis of MRI-Based Classification Models\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Shahram, Mostafa Robatjazi, Atefeh Rostami, Vahid Shahmaei, Ramin Shahrayini, Mohammad Salari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ima.70188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease-causing neurological disability, particularly in young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective tool for detecting MS plaques, but contrast-enhanced imaging involves potential risks, including toxicity and increased imaging time. Previous methods for differentiating plaque types, such as texture analysis and manual feature extraction, face challenges such as limited datasets and poor generalizability. This study aims to develop and compare deep learning-based methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to classify MS lesion types using non-contrast MRI, aiming to improve clinical applicability and reduce reliance on contrast agents. This study involved 106 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from two MRI centers. A total of 3410 lesions were analyzed, including 1408 active and 2002 inactive lesions. MRI images, including T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium contrast (T1 + Gd(, T1, Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and T2 sequences, were acquired. The segmented lesions were converted into 2D slices and resampled to 128 × 128 pixels for deep learning input. Data augmentation and normalization were applied to improve model generalizability. A custom CNN model was developed and compared with four pre-trained models (ResNet50, VGG16, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0) using fivefold cross-validation to evaluate model performance. Performance metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were used. The custom CNN achieved 90.15% accuracy and 94.67% AUC in FLAIR, outperforming pre-trained models. DenseNet121 showed competitive results with 88.23% accuracy and 92.86% AUC in FLAIR. Non-contrast sequences (T1, T2, and FLAIR) combined with deep learning provided promising results, reducing reliance on contrast agents. The custom CNN model excelled in classifying MS lesions across multiple MRI sequences, offering improved diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Custom models for specialized datasets can enhance clinical outcomes, demonstrating the potential of deep learning in MS diagnosis. These findings suggest that deep learning models can be replaced with contrast agents in routine practice. Future research may explore combining CNNs with clinical features to enhance performance and interpretability.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ima.70188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep Learning for Differentiating Active and Inactive Multiple Sclerosis Plaques: A Comparative Analysis of MRI-Based Classification Models
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease-causing neurological disability, particularly in young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective tool for detecting MS plaques, but contrast-enhanced imaging involves potential risks, including toxicity and increased imaging time. Previous methods for differentiating plaque types, such as texture analysis and manual feature extraction, face challenges such as limited datasets and poor generalizability. This study aims to develop and compare deep learning-based methods, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to classify MS lesion types using non-contrast MRI, aiming to improve clinical applicability and reduce reliance on contrast agents. This study involved 106 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from two MRI centers. A total of 3410 lesions were analyzed, including 1408 active and 2002 inactive lesions. MRI images, including T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium contrast (T1 + Gd(, T1, Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and T2 sequences, were acquired. The segmented lesions were converted into 2D slices and resampled to 128 × 128 pixels for deep learning input. Data augmentation and normalization were applied to improve model generalizability. A custom CNN model was developed and compared with four pre-trained models (ResNet50, VGG16, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0) using fivefold cross-validation to evaluate model performance. Performance metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were used. The custom CNN achieved 90.15% accuracy and 94.67% AUC in FLAIR, outperforming pre-trained models. DenseNet121 showed competitive results with 88.23% accuracy and 92.86% AUC in FLAIR. Non-contrast sequences (T1, T2, and FLAIR) combined with deep learning provided promising results, reducing reliance on contrast agents. The custom CNN model excelled in classifying MS lesions across multiple MRI sequences, offering improved diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Custom models for specialized datasets can enhance clinical outcomes, demonstrating the potential of deep learning in MS diagnosis. These findings suggest that deep learning models can be replaced with contrast agents in routine practice. Future research may explore combining CNNs with clinical features to enhance performance and interpretability.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology (IMA) is a forum for the exchange of ideas and results relevant to imaging systems, including imaging physics and informatics. The journal covers all imaging modalities in humans and animals.
IMA accepts technically sound and scientifically rigorous research in the interdisciplinary field of imaging, including relevant algorithmic research and hardware and software development, and their applications relevant to medical research. The journal provides a platform to publish original research in structural and functional imaging.
The journal is also open to imaging studies of the human body and on animals that describe novel diagnostic imaging and analyses methods. Technical, theoretical, and clinical research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, replication studies as well as negative results are also considered.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following in the context of biomedical research:
Imaging and neuro-imaging modalities: structural MRI, functional MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, ultrasound, EEG, MEG, NIRS etc.;
Neuromodulation and brain stimulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS;
Software and hardware for imaging, especially related to human and animal health;
Image segmentation in normal and clinical populations;
Pattern analysis and classification using machine learning techniques;
Computational modeling and analysis;
Brain connectivity and connectomics;
Systems-level characterization of brain function;
Neural networks and neurorobotics;
Computer vision, based on human/animal physiology;
Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology;
Big data, databasing and data mining.