跨学科工作的社会表征从学生和临床导师的角度在智利心血管康复计划

Q1 Social Sciences
Raúl Ahumada , Marcela Aravena-Winkler , Cinara Sacomori
{"title":"跨学科工作的社会表征从学生和临床导师的角度在智利心血管康复计划","authors":"Raúl Ahumada ,&nbsp;Marcela Aravena-Winkler ,&nbsp;Cinara Sacomori","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is scientifically recommended for its effectiveness and depends on interprofessional collaboration. However, the lack of clarity regarding how professionals collaborate limits clinical and educational actions and affects social representations.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand and compare the social representations of students and clinical tutors regarding their interdisciplinary work in the CR program at Hospital Padre Hurtado.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study drew on Moscovici's theory of social representations and employed a grounded theory methodology. The sample consisted of six clinical tutors and twelve students who participated in two focus groups and four in-depth individual interviews. Data were analyzed using Atlas.ti V3.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study’s central category was <em>Interdisciplinarity</em> which serves as a theoretical construct giving rise to the practical action of interdisciplinary work. This central category articulates three key social practices: solving health issues, interdisciplinary communication, and teamwork. The latter emerged as the anchoring mechanism that solidified their social representation. Both students and clinical tutors shared a positive view of interdisciplinary work, but their symbolic anchors for \"teamwork\" differed: tutors emphasized technical and ethical-professional aspects, while students viewed the concept from an emotional and formative standpoint. Communication was identified as a transversal axis of the interdisciplinary practice, with tutors emphasizing technical and organizational dimensions, and students highlighting emotional and relational elements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The social representation of interdisciplinarity varies according to educational trajectories. This diversity presents an opportunity to intertwine the technical expertise of tutors with the emotionally situated experiences of students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social representations of interdisciplinary work from the perspectives of students and clinical tutors on a cardiovascular rehabilitation program in Chile\",\"authors\":\"Raúl Ahumada ,&nbsp;Marcela Aravena-Winkler ,&nbsp;Cinara Sacomori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is scientifically recommended for its effectiveness and depends on interprofessional collaboration. However, the lack of clarity regarding how professionals collaborate limits clinical and educational actions and affects social representations.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand and compare the social representations of students and clinical tutors regarding their interdisciplinary work in the CR program at Hospital Padre Hurtado.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study drew on Moscovici's theory of social representations and employed a grounded theory methodology. The sample consisted of six clinical tutors and twelve students who participated in two focus groups and four in-depth individual interviews. Data were analyzed using Atlas.ti V3.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study’s central category was <em>Interdisciplinarity</em> which serves as a theoretical construct giving rise to the practical action of interdisciplinary work. This central category articulates three key social practices: solving health issues, interdisciplinary communication, and teamwork. The latter emerged as the anchoring mechanism that solidified their social representation. Both students and clinical tutors shared a positive view of interdisciplinary work, but their symbolic anchors for \\\"teamwork\\\" differed: tutors emphasized technical and ethical-professional aspects, while students viewed the concept from an emotional and formative standpoint. Communication was identified as a transversal axis of the interdisciplinary practice, with tutors emphasizing technical and organizational dimensions, and students highlighting emotional and relational elements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The social representation of interdisciplinarity varies according to educational trajectories. This diversity presents an opportunity to intertwine the technical expertise of tutors with the emotionally situated experiences of students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025000792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025000792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏康复(CR)因其有效性而被科学推荐,并依赖于专业间的合作。然而,缺乏关于专业人员如何合作的清晰度限制了临床和教育行动,并影响了社会表征。目的了解并比较乌尔塔多Padre Hurtado医院CR项目学生和临床导师对跨学科工作的社会表征。方法借鉴莫斯科维奇的社会表征理论,采用扎根理论研究方法。样本由6名临床导师和12名学生组成,他们参加了2个焦点小组和4个深入的个人访谈。使用Atlas分析数据。ti V3.0。结果本研究的中心范畴是跨学科性,它是一个理论建构,促进跨学科工作的实际行动。这一中心类别阐明了三个关键的社会实践:解决健康问题、跨学科沟通和团队合作。后者成为巩固其社会代表性的锚定机制。学生和临床导师都对跨学科工作持积极态度,但他们对“团队合作”的象征性锚不同:导师强调技术和道德专业方面,而学生则从情感和形成的角度看待这个概念。沟通被确定为跨学科实践的横向轴,导师强调技术和组织维度,学生强调情感和关系要素。结论跨学科的社会表征随教育轨迹的不同而不同。这种多样性提供了一个机会,将导师的技术专长与学生的情感体验交织在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social representations of interdisciplinary work from the perspectives of students and clinical tutors on a cardiovascular rehabilitation program in Chile

Background

Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is scientifically recommended for its effectiveness and depends on interprofessional collaboration. However, the lack of clarity regarding how professionals collaborate limits clinical and educational actions and affects social representations.

Objective

To understand and compare the social representations of students and clinical tutors regarding their interdisciplinary work in the CR program at Hospital Padre Hurtado.

Method

The study drew on Moscovici's theory of social representations and employed a grounded theory methodology. The sample consisted of six clinical tutors and twelve students who participated in two focus groups and four in-depth individual interviews. Data were analyzed using Atlas.ti V3.0.

Results

The study’s central category was Interdisciplinarity which serves as a theoretical construct giving rise to the practical action of interdisciplinary work. This central category articulates three key social practices: solving health issues, interdisciplinary communication, and teamwork. The latter emerged as the anchoring mechanism that solidified their social representation. Both students and clinical tutors shared a positive view of interdisciplinary work, but their symbolic anchors for "teamwork" differed: tutors emphasized technical and ethical-professional aspects, while students viewed the concept from an emotional and formative standpoint. Communication was identified as a transversal axis of the interdisciplinary practice, with tutors emphasizing technical and organizational dimensions, and students highlighting emotional and relational elements.

Conclusions

The social representation of interdisciplinarity varies according to educational trajectories. This diversity presents an opportunity to intertwine the technical expertise of tutors with the emotionally situated experiences of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信