反馈的情感维度:人工智能和人类反应如何塑造ESL学习成果

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Amin Shahini
{"title":"反馈的情感维度:人工智能和人类反应如何塑造ESL学习成果","authors":"Amin Shahini","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2025.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feedback, interacts with learners' Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) to influence language proficiency development. Adopting a quasi-experimental design with a purely quantitative methodological orientation, the research recruited 63 intermediate-level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners and assigned them randomly to either an AI feedback group or a teacher feedback group. Participants completed five academic writing and speaking tasks over six weeks, each followed by an immediate feedback and revision cycle. Measurements included pre- and post-intervention language proficiency assessments, alongside the administration of validated scales for TEI and FLE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and mediated pathways between variables. Results revealed that TEI significantly predicted learners' levels of FLE, which, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between feedback type and language proficiency improvement. Teacher feedback demonstrated a stronger positive effect on FLE compared to AI feedback. The SEM model exhibited excellent fit indices, confirming the robustness of the hypothesized structure. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional dimensions in feedback practices, suggesting that optimal language learning outcomes arise not merely from the cognitive correction of errors but also from the emotional resonance that feedback generates. Implications are discussed for pedagogical practices, AI design in language education, and the broader field of affective second language acquisition research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Amin Shahini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amper.2025.100235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feedback, interacts with learners' Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) to influence language proficiency development. Adopting a quasi-experimental design with a purely quantitative methodological orientation, the research recruited 63 intermediate-level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners and assigned them randomly to either an AI feedback group or a teacher feedback group. Participants completed five academic writing and speaking tasks over six weeks, each followed by an immediate feedback and revision cycle. Measurements included pre- and post-intervention language proficiency assessments, alongside the administration of validated scales for TEI and FLE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and mediated pathways between variables. Results revealed that TEI significantly predicted learners' levels of FLE, which, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between feedback type and language proficiency improvement. Teacher feedback demonstrated a stronger positive effect on FLE compared to AI feedback. The SEM model exhibited excellent fit indices, confirming the robustness of the hypothesized structure. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional dimensions in feedback practices, suggesting that optimal language learning outcomes arise not merely from the cognitive correction of errors but also from the emotional resonance that feedback generates. Implications are discussed for pedagogical practices, AI design in language education, and the broader field of affective second language acquisition research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ampersand\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ampersand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反馈的提供是二语习得中最有效的教学干预之一,然而其有效性背后的情感机制仍然知之甚少。本研究探讨了反馈类型,特别是人工智能生成的反馈与教师提供的反馈,如何与学习者的特质情商(TEI)和外语享受(FLE)相互作用,从而影响语言能力的发展。本研究采用准实验设计,以纯定量方法为导向,招募了63名中级英语学习者,并将他们随机分配到人工智能反馈组和教师反馈组。参与者在六周内完成了五项学术写作和口语任务,每项任务都有即时反馈和修改周期。测量包括干预前和干预后的语言能力评估,以及TEI和FLE的有效量表的管理。结构方程模型(SEM)用于检查变量之间的直接和间接途径。结果表明,TEI显著预测学习者的英语水平,而英语水平又显著中介反馈类型与语言水平提高之间的关系。与人工智能反馈相比,教师反馈对FLE的积极影响更大。SEM模型显示出良好的拟合指数,证实了假设结构的稳健性。这些发现强调了在反馈实践中处理情感维度的重要性,表明最佳的语言学习结果不仅来自对错误的认知纠正,还来自反馈产生的情感共鸣。讨论了教学实践、语言教育中的人工智能设计以及情感第二语言习得研究的更广泛领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
The provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feedback, interacts with learners' Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) to influence language proficiency development. Adopting a quasi-experimental design with a purely quantitative methodological orientation, the research recruited 63 intermediate-level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners and assigned them randomly to either an AI feedback group or a teacher feedback group. Participants completed five academic writing and speaking tasks over six weeks, each followed by an immediate feedback and revision cycle. Measurements included pre- and post-intervention language proficiency assessments, alongside the administration of validated scales for TEI and FLE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and mediated pathways between variables. Results revealed that TEI significantly predicted learners' levels of FLE, which, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between feedback type and language proficiency improvement. Teacher feedback demonstrated a stronger positive effect on FLE compared to AI feedback. The SEM model exhibited excellent fit indices, confirming the robustness of the hypothesized structure. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional dimensions in feedback practices, suggesting that optimal language learning outcomes arise not merely from the cognitive correction of errors but also from the emotional resonance that feedback generates. Implications are discussed for pedagogical practices, AI design in language education, and the broader field of affective second language acquisition research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信