农村子宫内膜癌诊治体会

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victoria M. Petermann PhD, RN, Brianna D. Taffe MPH, Blen M. Biru MSc, Jennifer Leeman DrPH, MPH, MDiV, Ashley Leak Bryant PhD, RN, OCN, FAAN, Benjamin B. Albright MD, MS, Stephanie B. Wheeler PhD, MPH, Victoria L. Bae-Jump MD, PhD, Lanneau Grainger MD, Lisa P. Spees PhD
{"title":"农村子宫内膜癌诊治体会","authors":"Victoria M. Petermann PhD, RN,&nbsp;Brianna D. Taffe MPH,&nbsp;Blen M. Biru MSc,&nbsp;Jennifer Leeman DrPH, MPH, MDiV,&nbsp;Ashley Leak Bryant PhD, RN, OCN, FAAN,&nbsp;Benjamin B. Albright MD, MS,&nbsp;Stephanie B. Wheeler PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Victoria L. Bae-Jump MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lanneau Grainger MD,&nbsp;Lisa P. Spees PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients are less likely to receive lymph node evaluation, high-quality surgical care, and adjuvant therapy compared to urban patients. Developing interventions to effectively address barriers to quality care requires understanding patient experiences across the cancer care continuum. Our objective was to understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of rural EC patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 participants (22 patients, one caregiver) from rural counties in North Carolina. We developed a semistructured interview guide to examine the experiences of patients during diagnosis and treatment. Initial codes were derived from a multilevel conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified six themes reflecting determinants of diagnosis and seven themes for treatment of EC for rural patients. Provider knowledge of EC symptoms, patient symptom normalization, and fear were all discussed as major factors impacting delays in EC diagnosis. Participants noted that social networks influenced them to seek care for symptoms they did not otherwise see as concerning. During treatment, participants experienced financial burdens, and many reported significant challenges traveling to treatment. Social networks were critical for financial support and transportation to and from treatment. Personal health care experiences and community perceptions about rural cancer care also influenced decisions about where to seek gynecologic cancer treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the need to improve rural provider adherence to guidelines for EC detection, increase symptom knowledge among rural communities, and implement comprehensive assessments of unmet needs of rural patients during treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural patients’ experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer\",\"authors\":\"Victoria M. Petermann PhD, RN,&nbsp;Brianna D. Taffe MPH,&nbsp;Blen M. Biru MSc,&nbsp;Jennifer Leeman DrPH, MPH, MDiV,&nbsp;Ashley Leak Bryant PhD, RN, OCN, FAAN,&nbsp;Benjamin B. Albright MD, MS,&nbsp;Stephanie B. Wheeler PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Victoria L. Bae-Jump MD, PhD,&nbsp;Lanneau Grainger MD,&nbsp;Lisa P. Spees PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients are less likely to receive lymph node evaluation, high-quality surgical care, and adjuvant therapy compared to urban patients. Developing interventions to effectively address barriers to quality care requires understanding patient experiences across the cancer care continuum. Our objective was to understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of rural EC patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 participants (22 patients, one caregiver) from rural counties in North Carolina. We developed a semistructured interview guide to examine the experiences of patients during diagnosis and treatment. Initial codes were derived from a multilevel conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified six themes reflecting determinants of diagnosis and seven themes for treatment of EC for rural patients. Provider knowledge of EC symptoms, patient symptom normalization, and fear were all discussed as major factors impacting delays in EC diagnosis. Participants noted that social networks influenced them to seek care for symptoms they did not otherwise see as concerning. During treatment, participants experienced financial burdens, and many reported significant challenges traveling to treatment. Social networks were critical for financial support and transportation to and from treatment. Personal health care experiences and community perceptions about rural cancer care also influenced decisions about where to seek gynecologic cancer treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights the need to improve rural provider adherence to guidelines for EC detection, increase symptom knowledge among rural communities, and implement comprehensive assessments of unmet needs of rural patients during treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与城市患者相比,农村子宫内膜癌(EC)患者接受淋巴结评估、高质量手术护理和辅助治疗的可能性较小。开发干预措施以有效地解决高质量护理的障碍,需要了解整个癌症护理连续体的患者经历。我们的目的是了解农村EC患者的诊断和治疗经验。方法:我们对来自北卡罗来纳州农村县的23名参与者(22名患者,1名护理人员)进行了半结构化访谈。我们开发了一种半结构化的访谈指南来检查患者在诊断和治疗期间的经历。从农村癌症控制的多层次概念框架中获得初始代码,并使用主题分析对转录的访谈进行分析。结果我们确定了反映诊断决定因素的6个主题和农村患者EC治疗的7个主题。提供者对EC症状的了解、患者症状的正常化和恐惧都被认为是影响EC诊断延误的主要因素。参与者指出,社交网络影响了他们去寻求治疗,否则他们就不会关注这些症状。在治疗期间,参与者经历了经济负担,许多人报告了前往治疗的重大挑战。社交网络对经济支持和往返治疗的交通至关重要。个人保健经历和社区对农村癌症护理的看法也影响到在哪里寻求妇科癌症治疗的决定。结论:本研究强调需要提高农村医疗服务提供者对EC检测指南的依从性,增加农村社区的症状知识,并对农村患者在治疗过程中未满足的需求进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rural patients’ experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer

Rural patients’ experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer

Background

Rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients are less likely to receive lymph node evaluation, high-quality surgical care, and adjuvant therapy compared to urban patients. Developing interventions to effectively address barriers to quality care requires understanding patient experiences across the cancer care continuum. Our objective was to understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of rural EC patients.

Methods

We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 participants (22 patients, one caregiver) from rural counties in North Carolina. We developed a semistructured interview guide to examine the experiences of patients during diagnosis and treatment. Initial codes were derived from a multilevel conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

We identified six themes reflecting determinants of diagnosis and seven themes for treatment of EC for rural patients. Provider knowledge of EC symptoms, patient symptom normalization, and fear were all discussed as major factors impacting delays in EC diagnosis. Participants noted that social networks influenced them to seek care for symptoms they did not otherwise see as concerning. During treatment, participants experienced financial burdens, and many reported significant challenges traveling to treatment. Social networks were critical for financial support and transportation to and from treatment. Personal health care experiences and community perceptions about rural cancer care also influenced decisions about where to seek gynecologic cancer treatment.

Conclusions

This study highlights the need to improve rural provider adherence to guidelines for EC detection, increase symptom knowledge among rural communities, and implement comprehensive assessments of unmet needs of rural patients during treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信