后时代的性与暴力——#MeToo

Frédéric C. Baitinger
{"title":"后时代的性与暴力——#MeToo","authors":"Frédéric C. Baitinger","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>In the post-#MeToo era, sexuality can no longer be conceived as the pure liberation of desire.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article reconsiders the promises of “unfettered enjoyment” (Kournif, Pall, Dompnier) in light of the systemic sexual violence that this utopia has sometimes obscured.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>By tracing the critical reversal in discourses on sexual freedom—particularly within feminist (MacKinnon, Dworkin) and queer (Niedergang, Dustan, Rémès) circles—the paper demonstrates how the heroic paradigm of transgression collapses under the ethical imperative to reckon with vulnerability. This shift is examined through a corpus of intellectual interventions from the 1970s, now re-read in light of contemporary critiques (Alfandary, Allouch). Within this framework, psychoanalysis — especially in its articulation of fantasy, anxiety, jouissance, and the desire of the Other (Freud, Lacan) — offers a rigorous conceptual tool for reconfiguring our relationship to the sexual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through a close reading of <em>The Devil in Love</em> by Cazotte, the article explores what it means to <em>enjoy the loss</em>: to accept the relinquishment of knowledge about desire, and to recognize that the obstacle is not external to the erotic but lies at its very core.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>To think sexuality in this way is neither to exonerate nor to idealize it, but to confront what it demands most deeply: a fragile bond, stretched between a fading fantasy and an Other who insists—a bond made possible not despite the loss, but from within it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jouir de la perte : sexualité et violence à l’ère post-#MeToo\",\"authors\":\"Frédéric C. Baitinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>In the post-#MeToo era, sexuality can no longer be conceived as the pure liberation of desire.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article reconsiders the promises of “unfettered enjoyment” (Kournif, Pall, Dompnier) in light of the systemic sexual violence that this utopia has sometimes obscured.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>By tracing the critical reversal in discourses on sexual freedom—particularly within feminist (MacKinnon, Dworkin) and queer (Niedergang, Dustan, Rémès) circles—the paper demonstrates how the heroic paradigm of transgression collapses under the ethical imperative to reckon with vulnerability. This shift is examined through a corpus of intellectual interventions from the 1970s, now re-read in light of contemporary critiques (Alfandary, Allouch). Within this framework, psychoanalysis — especially in its articulation of fantasy, anxiety, jouissance, and the desire of the Other (Freud, Lacan) — offers a rigorous conceptual tool for reconfiguring our relationship to the sexual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through a close reading of <em>The Devil in Love</em> by Cazotte, the article explores what it means to <em>enjoy the loss</em>: to accept the relinquishment of knowledge about desire, and to recognize that the obstacle is not external to the erotic but lies at its very core.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>To think sexuality in this way is neither to exonerate nor to idealize it, but to confront what it demands most deeply: a fragile bond, stretched between a fading fantasy and an Other who insists—a bond made possible not despite the loss, but from within it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Analysis\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360625000460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360625000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在后#MeToo时代,性不再被认为是欲望的纯粹解放。本文重新考虑了“不受约束的享受”的承诺(Kournif, Pall, Dompnier),鉴于这个乌托邦有时被遮蔽的系统性暴力。方法通过追溯性自由话语的批判性逆转——特别是在女权主义者(麦金农、德沃金)和酷儿(尼德刚、杜斯坦、雷姆斯)圈子里——本文展示了在考虑脆弱性的道德要求下,越界的英雄范式是如何崩溃的。这种转变是通过20世纪70年代的智力干预的语料库来检验的,现在根据当代的批评重新阅读(Alfandary, Allouch)。在这个框架内,精神分析——尤其是它对幻想、焦虑、欢爽和他者欲望(弗洛伊德、拉康)的表达——为重新配置我们与性的关系提供了一个严格的概念工具。通过仔细阅读卡佐特的《恋爱中的魔鬼》,本文探讨了享受失去的意义:接受放弃关于欲望的知识,并认识到障碍不是外在的,而是在它的核心。以这种方式思考性,既不是要为它开脱,也不是要把它理想化,而是要面对它最深切的需求:一种脆弱的纽带,在逐渐消退的幻想和坚持的他者之间延伸——一种不是在失去的情况下,而是在失去的情况下才成为可能的纽带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jouir de la perte : sexualité et violence à l’ère post-#MeToo

Context

In the post-#MeToo era, sexuality can no longer be conceived as the pure liberation of desire.

Objectives

This article reconsiders the promises of “unfettered enjoyment” (Kournif, Pall, Dompnier) in light of the systemic sexual violence that this utopia has sometimes obscured.

Methods

By tracing the critical reversal in discourses on sexual freedom—particularly within feminist (MacKinnon, Dworkin) and queer (Niedergang, Dustan, Rémès) circles—the paper demonstrates how the heroic paradigm of transgression collapses under the ethical imperative to reckon with vulnerability. This shift is examined through a corpus of intellectual interventions from the 1970s, now re-read in light of contemporary critiques (Alfandary, Allouch). Within this framework, psychoanalysis — especially in its articulation of fantasy, anxiety, jouissance, and the desire of the Other (Freud, Lacan) — offers a rigorous conceptual tool for reconfiguring our relationship to the sexual.

Results

Through a close reading of The Devil in Love by Cazotte, the article explores what it means to enjoy the loss: to accept the relinquishment of knowledge about desire, and to recognize that the obstacle is not external to the erotic but lies at its very core.

Interpretations

To think sexuality in this way is neither to exonerate nor to idealize it, but to confront what it demands most deeply: a fragile bond, stretched between a fading fantasy and an Other who insists—a bond made possible not despite the loss, but from within it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信