关系和文化敏感的人工智能创新

Christian Herzog
{"title":"关系和文化敏感的人工智能创新","authors":"Christian Herzog","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, I argue that responsibly developing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions necessitates a deep understanding of the cultural landscapes involved. Especially considering AI's universalistic tendencies, varying, possibly conflicting interests, values, and epistemes require special consideration. I advocate for a cultural sensitivity that aligns with a relational ethics perspective to address power asymmetries, empower marginalized groups, and recognize epistemic privileges. By laying out how technology pervades cultures, I contribute to the case for a culturally informed approach to ethics that empowers individuals to autonomously transform (or conserve) cultures. I then discuss a structural integration of cultural studies into the training and practices of technology and AI engineers and officers. By discussing relational ethics as intimately tied to a culturally sensitive approach to technology development, I join proponents of a closer collaboration between ethics and cultural studies that can yield insights and methodologies that respect diverse cultural contexts and challenge the primacy of disruptive innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational & culture-sensitive AI innovation\",\"authors\":\"Christian Herzog\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this article, I argue that responsibly developing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions necessitates a deep understanding of the cultural landscapes involved. Especially considering AI's universalistic tendencies, varying, possibly conflicting interests, values, and epistemes require special consideration. I advocate for a cultural sensitivity that aligns with a relational ethics perspective to address power asymmetries, empower marginalized groups, and recognize epistemic privileges. By laying out how technology pervades cultures, I contribute to the case for a culturally informed approach to ethics that empowers individuals to autonomously transform (or conserve) cultures. I then discuss a structural integration of cultural studies into the training and practices of technology and AI engineers and officers. By discussing relational ethics as intimately tied to a culturally sensitive approach to technology development, I join proponents of a closer collaboration between ethics and cultural studies that can yield insights and methodologies that respect diverse cultural contexts and challenge the primacy of disruptive innovation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659625000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我认为负责任地开发人工智能(AI)解决方案需要对所涉及的文化景观有深刻的理解。特别是考虑到人工智能的普遍倾向,不同的,可能相互冲突的利益,价值观和知识需要特别考虑。我提倡一种与关系伦理观点相一致的文化敏感性,以解决权力不对称,赋予边缘化群体权力,并承认认知特权。通过展示技术如何渗透文化,我提出了一种文化知情的伦理方法,使个人能够自主地改造(或保护)文化。然后,我讨论了文化研究与技术和人工智能工程师和官员的培训和实践的结构性整合。通过讨论与技术发展的文化敏感方法密切相关的关系伦理,我加入了伦理和文化研究之间更密切合作的支持者,这种合作可以产生尊重不同文化背景的见解和方法,并挑战破坏性创新的首要地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relational & culture-sensitive AI innovation
In this article, I argue that responsibly developing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions necessitates a deep understanding of the cultural landscapes involved. Especially considering AI's universalistic tendencies, varying, possibly conflicting interests, values, and epistemes require special consideration. I advocate for a cultural sensitivity that aligns with a relational ethics perspective to address power asymmetries, empower marginalized groups, and recognize epistemic privileges. By laying out how technology pervades cultures, I contribute to the case for a culturally informed approach to ethics that empowers individuals to autonomously transform (or conserve) cultures. I then discuss a structural integration of cultural studies into the training and practices of technology and AI engineers and officers. By discussing relational ethics as intimately tied to a culturally sensitive approach to technology development, I join proponents of a closer collaboration between ethics and cultural studies that can yield insights and methodologies that respect diverse cultural contexts and challenge the primacy of disruptive innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信