研究者之间的关系伦理:一个本土的定性视角

Q2 Psychology
Gloria Fraser
{"title":"研究者之间的关系伦理:一个本土的定性视角","authors":"Gloria Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Qualitative research has long emphasized the ethics of researcher-participant relationships, however far less attention has been given to the ethical complexities of relationships between research collaborators. For Indigenous researchers, research collaborations can be shaped by tokenism within academic institutions that often prioritize funding success and publication outputs over relationality. Drawing on my experiences as a Māori qualitative researcher, this commentary explores the often-overlooked ethics of researcher-researcher relationships and advocates for a relational ethics approach, grounded in Māori values of whanaungatanga (building and maintaining relationships) and manaakitanga (care, reciprocity, and collective responsibility) as central to ethical qualitative research. I reflect on the ways in which Indigenous researchers are often positioned as cultural consultants rather than full research partners, with cultural responsibilities delegated to them instead of being collectively considered within research teams. In response, I offer reflections on how qualitative researchers can cultivate meaningful, reciprocal relationships that extend beyond transactional academic norms. Taking time to build relationships before formal collaborations begin, pushing back against extractive research practices, and shifting institutional cultures to recognize relational work as valuable are all critical steps. Ultimately, I imagine a more compassionate and just academy—one that values relationships as central to ethical research and recognizes the transformational potential of decolonization in shifting what counts as success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational ethics between researchers: An Indigenous qualitative perspective\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Qualitative research has long emphasized the ethics of researcher-participant relationships, however far less attention has been given to the ethical complexities of relationships between research collaborators. For Indigenous researchers, research collaborations can be shaped by tokenism within academic institutions that often prioritize funding success and publication outputs over relationality. Drawing on my experiences as a Māori qualitative researcher, this commentary explores the often-overlooked ethics of researcher-researcher relationships and advocates for a relational ethics approach, grounded in Māori values of whanaungatanga (building and maintaining relationships) and manaakitanga (care, reciprocity, and collective responsibility) as central to ethical qualitative research. I reflect on the ways in which Indigenous researchers are often positioned as cultural consultants rather than full research partners, with cultural responsibilities delegated to them instead of being collectively considered within research teams. In response, I offer reflections on how qualitative researchers can cultivate meaningful, reciprocal relationships that extend beyond transactional academic norms. Taking time to build relationships before formal collaborations begin, pushing back against extractive research practices, and shifting institutional cultures to recognize relational work as valuable are all critical steps. Ultimately, I imagine a more compassionate and just academy—one that values relationships as central to ethical research and recognizes the transformational potential of decolonization in shifting what counts as success.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定性研究长期以来一直强调研究人员与参与者关系的伦理,然而,对研究合作者之间关系的伦理复杂性的关注远远不够。对于土著研究人员来说,研究合作可以由学术机构内部的象征主义塑造,这些机构往往优先考虑资助成功和出版成果,而不是关系。根据我作为Māori定性研究者的经验,这篇评论探讨了经常被忽视的研究者-研究者关系的伦理,并倡导一种关系伦理方法,以Māori的whanaungatanga(建立和维持关系)和manaakitanga(关怀、互惠和集体责任)的价值观为基础,作为伦理定性研究的核心。我反思了土著研究人员经常被定位为文化顾问而不是完全的研究伙伴的方式,文化责任被委派给他们,而不是在研究团队中被集体考虑。作为回应,我就定性研究人员如何培养超越事务性学术规范的有意义的互惠关系提出了一些思考。在正式合作开始之前花时间建立关系,抵制抽取性的研究实践,改变机构文化以认识到关系工作的价值,这些都是关键步骤。最终,我设想了一个更富有同情心、更公正的学院——一个将人际关系视为伦理研究的核心,并认识到非殖民化在改变成功方面的变革潜力的学院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relational ethics between researchers: An Indigenous qualitative perspective
Qualitative research has long emphasized the ethics of researcher-participant relationships, however far less attention has been given to the ethical complexities of relationships between research collaborators. For Indigenous researchers, research collaborations can be shaped by tokenism within academic institutions that often prioritize funding success and publication outputs over relationality. Drawing on my experiences as a Māori qualitative researcher, this commentary explores the often-overlooked ethics of researcher-researcher relationships and advocates for a relational ethics approach, grounded in Māori values of whanaungatanga (building and maintaining relationships) and manaakitanga (care, reciprocity, and collective responsibility) as central to ethical qualitative research. I reflect on the ways in which Indigenous researchers are often positioned as cultural consultants rather than full research partners, with cultural responsibilities delegated to them instead of being collectively considered within research teams. In response, I offer reflections on how qualitative researchers can cultivate meaningful, reciprocal relationships that extend beyond transactional academic norms. Taking time to build relationships before formal collaborations begin, pushing back against extractive research practices, and shifting institutional cultures to recognize relational work as valuable are all critical steps. Ultimately, I imagine a more compassionate and just academy—one that values relationships as central to ethical research and recognizes the transformational potential of decolonization in shifting what counts as success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信