扫描质子治疗中多叶准直器动态准直的剂量学和时间评价:一项计划研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yushi Wakisaka , Yuki Tominaga , Keith M Furutani , Teiji Nishio
{"title":"扫描质子治疗中多叶准直器动态准直的剂量学和时间评价:一项计划研究","authors":"Yushi Wakisaka ,&nbsp;Yuki Tominaga ,&nbsp;Keith M Furutani ,&nbsp;Teiji Nishio","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The MELTHEA V proton therapy system incorporates a beam nozzle capable of both passive scattering and active scanning, featuring a multi-leaf collimator (MLC). This study evaluates the dosimetric and temporal efficiency of dynamic collimation using the universal MLC with the scanning method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three MLC configurations were defined: (1) nMLC – no MLC use; (2) sMLC – static leaf positioning across all energy layers; and (3) dMLC – dynamic leaf positioning changing with each energy layer. Since the treatment planning system does not support dMLC natively, it was implemented via scripting. First, various MLC margins were evaluated through phantom simulations. Then, using a representative margin, treatment plans for nine liver cancer cases were assessed for each MLC configuration. Irradiation delay time was simulated considering monitor units, dose rates, and the time characteristics of the irradiation system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phantom simulations demonstrated that an MLC margin of 0.5σ (with σ representing the in-medium spot size) effectively reduced the surrounding dose while preserving target coverage. For liver cancer cases, the average conformity index at the 50 % isodose line for nMLC, sMLC, and dMLC was 3.27 ± 0.60, 2.61 ± 0.28, and 2.28 ± 0.24, respectively. The mean doses in a 10-mm ring surrounding the target were 54.9 ± 2.5, 48.3 ± 3.9, and 41.4 ± 3.8 Gy, respectively. The average irradiation delay time of the dMLC was 8.4 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The dMLC demonstrated enhanced dosimetric performance compared to nMLC and sMLC, with minimal irradiation time delays, making it suitable for clinical liver cancer treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric and temporal evaluation of dynamic collimation with multi-leaf collimator in scanned proton therapy: A planning study\",\"authors\":\"Yushi Wakisaka ,&nbsp;Yuki Tominaga ,&nbsp;Keith M Furutani ,&nbsp;Teiji Nishio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The MELTHEA V proton therapy system incorporates a beam nozzle capable of both passive scattering and active scanning, featuring a multi-leaf collimator (MLC). This study evaluates the dosimetric and temporal efficiency of dynamic collimation using the universal MLC with the scanning method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three MLC configurations were defined: (1) nMLC – no MLC use; (2) sMLC – static leaf positioning across all energy layers; and (3) dMLC – dynamic leaf positioning changing with each energy layer. Since the treatment planning system does not support dMLC natively, it was implemented via scripting. First, various MLC margins were evaluated through phantom simulations. Then, using a representative margin, treatment plans for nine liver cancer cases were assessed for each MLC configuration. Irradiation delay time was simulated considering monitor units, dose rates, and the time characteristics of the irradiation system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phantom simulations demonstrated that an MLC margin of 0.5σ (with σ representing the in-medium spot size) effectively reduced the surrounding dose while preserving target coverage. For liver cancer cases, the average conformity index at the 50 % isodose line for nMLC, sMLC, and dMLC was 3.27 ± 0.60, 2.61 ± 0.28, and 2.28 ± 0.24, respectively. The mean doses in a 10-mm ring surrounding the target were 54.9 ± 2.5, 48.3 ± 3.9, and 41.4 ± 3.8 Gy, respectively. The average irradiation delay time of the dMLC was 8.4 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The dMLC demonstrated enhanced dosimetric performance compared to nMLC and sMLC, with minimal irradiation time delays, making it suitable for clinical liver cancer treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500198X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500198X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:MELTHEA V质子治疗系统包含一个能够被动散射和主动扫描的光束喷嘴,具有多叶准直器(MLC)。本研究评估了通用MLC扫描法动态准直的剂量学和时间效率。方法定义三种MLC配置:(1)nMLC -不使用MLC;(2) sMLC -所有能量层的静态叶片定位;(3)叶片动态定位随能量层的变化。由于治疗计划系统本身不支持dMLC,因此通过脚本实现。首先,通过模拟来评估不同的MLC余量。然后,使用有代表性的边际,对9例肝癌患者的治疗方案进行了评估。考虑监测单元、剂量率和辐照系统的时间特性,模拟辐照延迟时间。结果模拟结果表明,0.5σ (σ表示中斑大小)的MLC裕度可以有效降低周围剂量,同时保持目标覆盖。肝癌病例中,nMLC、sMLC和dMLC在50%等剂量线上的平均符合性指数分别为3.27±0.60、2.61±0.28和2.28±0.24。靶周围10mm环内的平均剂量分别为54.9±2.5 Gy、48.3±3.9 Gy和41.4±3.8 Gy。dMLC的平均照射延迟时间为8.4%。结论与nMLC和sMLC相比,dMLC具有更强的剂量学性能,且照射时间延迟最小,适合临床肝癌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dosimetric and temporal evaluation of dynamic collimation with multi-leaf collimator in scanned proton therapy: A planning study

Purpose

The MELTHEA V proton therapy system incorporates a beam nozzle capable of both passive scattering and active scanning, featuring a multi-leaf collimator (MLC). This study evaluates the dosimetric and temporal efficiency of dynamic collimation using the universal MLC with the scanning method.

Methods

Three MLC configurations were defined: (1) nMLC – no MLC use; (2) sMLC – static leaf positioning across all energy layers; and (3) dMLC – dynamic leaf positioning changing with each energy layer. Since the treatment planning system does not support dMLC natively, it was implemented via scripting. First, various MLC margins were evaluated through phantom simulations. Then, using a representative margin, treatment plans for nine liver cancer cases were assessed for each MLC configuration. Irradiation delay time was simulated considering monitor units, dose rates, and the time characteristics of the irradiation system.

Results

Phantom simulations demonstrated that an MLC margin of 0.5σ (with σ representing the in-medium spot size) effectively reduced the surrounding dose while preserving target coverage. For liver cancer cases, the average conformity index at the 50 % isodose line for nMLC, sMLC, and dMLC was 3.27 ± 0.60, 2.61 ± 0.28, and 2.28 ± 0.24, respectively. The mean doses in a 10-mm ring surrounding the target were 54.9 ± 2.5, 48.3 ± 3.9, and 41.4 ± 3.8 Gy, respectively. The average irradiation delay time of the dMLC was 8.4 %.

Conclusion

The dMLC demonstrated enhanced dosimetric performance compared to nMLC and sMLC, with minimal irradiation time delays, making it suitable for clinical liver cancer treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信