提高感知有效性可以提高气候政策的接受度

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kevin E. Tiede , Hellen Temme , Lena Lehrer , Cornelia Betsch
{"title":"提高感知有效性可以提高气候政策的接受度","authors":"Kevin E. Tiede ,&nbsp;Hellen Temme ,&nbsp;Lena Lehrer ,&nbsp;Cornelia Betsch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment (<em>N</em> = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later (<em>n</em> = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102725"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Kevin E. Tiede ,&nbsp;Hellen Temme ,&nbsp;Lena Lehrer ,&nbsp;Cornelia Betsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment (<em>N</em> = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later (<em>n</em> = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公众的接受对于气候政策的成功实施至关重要;因此,有必要了解其决定因素以及如何促进它。在本研究中,我们旨在检验感知有效性对政策接受程度的因果关系。为此,我们在实验中通过提供有关气候政策客观有效性的信息来操纵感知有效性。在一项预先登记的实验中(N = 953; T1),参与者被问及对德国高速公路限速的感知有效性和接受程度。在此之前,信息组的参与者被告知限速措施在二氧化碳减排方面的效果,而对照组的参与者则没有。参与者在1.5年后再次被问及感知有效性和政策接受度(n = 334; T2)。我们发现,在T1时,提供与不提供此类信息会导致更高的感知有效性,但不会带来更高的政策接受度。然而,在那些事先不知道限速有效性的参与者中,提供信息对T1时的感知有效性和政策接受度都有积极影响。在T1时了解政策有效性的被试中,在1.5年后(即T2时)能够回忆起政策有效性信息的被试,其感知有效性和政策接受度更高。我们的研究结果表明,感知有效性会对气候领域的政策接受程度产生因果关系。解释气候政策的客观有效性——并以人们可以随着时间的推移记住这些信息的方式进行——为决策者提供了一种有希望的方法,以提高公众对气候政策的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance
Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment (N = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO2 reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later (n = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信