射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者运动时有限的呼吸储备

Gizem Cifci MD, Daniel J. Brown BS, Barry A. Borlaug MD, Joshua R. Smith PhD
{"title":"射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者运动时有限的呼吸储备","authors":"Gizem Cifci MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Brown BS,&nbsp;Barry A. Borlaug MD,&nbsp;Joshua R. Smith PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit a tachypneic breathing strategy during exercise. Patients with HFpEF have pulmonary system alterations that may contribute to the breathing strategy in HFpEF.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Do patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve compared with control patients during exercise? Furthermore, does greater upper body adiposity contribute to the lower ventilatory reserves in HFpEF?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>Patients with HFpEF (n = 16; mean age ± SD, 70 ± 8 years) and control patients (n = 19; mean age ± SD, 69 ± 8 years) performed incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Trunk percent fat was quantified with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Inspiratory capacity, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes, and ventilatory variables were compared between groups at rest and during exercise at 40 W and peak oxygen uptake.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with HFpEF had lower total lung capacity (5.4 ± 1.1 vs 6.4 ± 1.2 L), FVC (3.1 ± 0.7 vs 3.8 ± 0.6 L), and FEV<sub>1</sub> than control patients (all <em>P</em> &lt; .04), respectively. During exercise at 40 W, patients with HFpEF had higher breathing frequency and smaller inspiratory reserve volume (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.3 L) and expiratory reserve volume (0.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.5 L) than control patients (both <em>P</em> &lt; .05), respectively. At peak oxygen uptake, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes were not different between groups (both <em>P</em> &gt; .21), but patients with HFpEF had lower end-inspiratory lung volume (<em>P</em> = .02). Patients with HFpEF had higher trunk percent fat than control patients (49% ± 7% vs 40% ± 8%, respectively; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Percent trunk fat was related to % predicted FVC (<em>r</em> = –0.57) and tidal volume to FVC ratio during exercise at 40 W (r = 0.53) for patients with HFpEF (both <em>P</em> &lt; .04) but not control patients (both <em>P</em> &gt; .72).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>These findings demonstrate that patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve during exercise, in part due to their smaller lung capacity. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the greater distribution of upper body adiposity in HFpEF is an important contributor to the smaller lung capacity for these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Ventilatory Reserve During Exercise in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction\",\"authors\":\"Gizem Cifci MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Brown BS,&nbsp;Barry A. Borlaug MD,&nbsp;Joshua R. Smith PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit a tachypneic breathing strategy during exercise. Patients with HFpEF have pulmonary system alterations that may contribute to the breathing strategy in HFpEF.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Do patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve compared with control patients during exercise? Furthermore, does greater upper body adiposity contribute to the lower ventilatory reserves in HFpEF?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>Patients with HFpEF (n = 16; mean age ± SD, 70 ± 8 years) and control patients (n = 19; mean age ± SD, 69 ± 8 years) performed incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Trunk percent fat was quantified with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Inspiratory capacity, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes, and ventilatory variables were compared between groups at rest and during exercise at 40 W and peak oxygen uptake.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with HFpEF had lower total lung capacity (5.4 ± 1.1 vs 6.4 ± 1.2 L), FVC (3.1 ± 0.7 vs 3.8 ± 0.6 L), and FEV<sub>1</sub> than control patients (all <em>P</em> &lt; .04), respectively. During exercise at 40 W, patients with HFpEF had higher breathing frequency and smaller inspiratory reserve volume (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.3 L) and expiratory reserve volume (0.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.5 L) than control patients (both <em>P</em> &lt; .05), respectively. At peak oxygen uptake, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes were not different between groups (both <em>P</em> &gt; .21), but patients with HFpEF had lower end-inspiratory lung volume (<em>P</em> = .02). Patients with HFpEF had higher trunk percent fat than control patients (49% ± 7% vs 40% ± 8%, respectively; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Percent trunk fat was related to % predicted FVC (<em>r</em> = –0.57) and tidal volume to FVC ratio during exercise at 40 W (r = 0.53) for patients with HFpEF (both <em>P</em> &lt; .04) but not control patients (both <em>P</em> &gt; .72).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>These findings demonstrate that patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve during exercise, in part due to their smaller lung capacity. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the greater distribution of upper body adiposity in HFpEF is an important contributor to the smaller lung capacity for these patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:具有保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者在运动时表现出呼吸急促的策略。HFpEF患者有肺系统改变,这可能有助于HFpEF患者的呼吸策略。研究问题:与对照组相比,HFpEF患者在运动时是否有有限的呼吸储备?此外,在HFpEF中,更大的上体脂肪是否导致了更低的通气储备?研究设计与方法HFpEF患者(n = 16,平均年龄±SD, 70±8岁)和对照患者(n = 19,平均年龄±SD, 69±8岁)进行增量循环至意志衰竭。躯干脂肪百分比用双能x线吸收仪定量。比较两组在休息和运动时的吸气量、吸气和呼气储备量以及呼吸变量。结果HFpEF患者的总肺活量(5.4±1.1 vs 6.4±1.2 L)、FVC(3.1±0.7 vs 3.8±0.6 L)和FEV1均低于对照组(P < 0.05)。在40 W运动时,HFpEF患者的呼吸频率高于对照组,吸气储备量(1.2±0.4 vs 1.5±0.3 L)和呼气储备量(0.9±0.4 vs 1.1±0.5 L)均小于对照组(P均为0.05)。在吸氧峰值时,两组间吸气和呼气储备体积无差异(P > .21),但HFpEF患者吸气末肺体积较低(P = .02)。HFpEF患者躯干脂肪百分比高于对照组(分别为49%±7% vs 40%±8%;P < 0.01)。HFpEF患者躯干脂肪百分比与预测FVC % (r = -0.57)和40 W运动时潮气量与FVC比(r = 0.53)相关(P < .04),而对照组无相关(P > .72)。这些研究结果表明,HFpEF患者在运动期间的呼吸储备有限,部分原因是他们的肺活量较小。此外,我们的研究结果表明,HFpEF患者上半身肥胖的较大分布是导致这些患者肺活量较小的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited Ventilatory Reserve During Exercise in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit a tachypneic breathing strategy during exercise. Patients with HFpEF have pulmonary system alterations that may contribute to the breathing strategy in HFpEF.

Research Question

Do patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve compared with control patients during exercise? Furthermore, does greater upper body adiposity contribute to the lower ventilatory reserves in HFpEF?

Study Design and Methods

Patients with HFpEF (n = 16; mean age ± SD, 70 ± 8 years) and control patients (n = 19; mean age ± SD, 69 ± 8 years) performed incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Trunk percent fat was quantified with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Inspiratory capacity, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes, and ventilatory variables were compared between groups at rest and during exercise at 40 W and peak oxygen uptake.

Results

Patients with HFpEF had lower total lung capacity (5.4 ± 1.1 vs 6.4 ± 1.2 L), FVC (3.1 ± 0.7 vs 3.8 ± 0.6 L), and FEV1 than control patients (all P < .04), respectively. During exercise at 40 W, patients with HFpEF had higher breathing frequency and smaller inspiratory reserve volume (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.3 L) and expiratory reserve volume (0.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.5 L) than control patients (both P < .05), respectively. At peak oxygen uptake, inspiratory and expiratory reserve volumes were not different between groups (both P > .21), but patients with HFpEF had lower end-inspiratory lung volume (P = .02). Patients with HFpEF had higher trunk percent fat than control patients (49% ± 7% vs 40% ± 8%, respectively; P < .01). Percent trunk fat was related to % predicted FVC (r = –0.57) and tidal volume to FVC ratio during exercise at 40 W (r = 0.53) for patients with HFpEF (both P < .04) but not control patients (both P > .72).

Interpretation

These findings demonstrate that patients with HFpEF have limited ventilatory reserve during exercise, in part due to their smaller lung capacity. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the greater distribution of upper body adiposity in HFpEF is an important contributor to the smaller lung capacity for these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信