远程皮肤科的交接延迟延长了黑色素瘤退伍军人的护理时间。

Samuel Byrne, Clayton Lau, Maya Gopalan, Sandra Mata-Diaz, Gregory J Raugi
{"title":"远程皮肤科的交接延迟延长了黑色素瘤退伍军人的护理时间。","authors":"Samuel Byrne, Clayton Lau, Maya Gopalan, Sandra Mata-Diaz, Gregory J Raugi","doi":"10.12788/fp.0587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) involves sending clinical images and patient information to a dermatologist for evaluation and is widely used in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Integrated Service Network 20. While SFT has increased access to dermatologic care, its impact on timely treatment is less well known. This study compares the timeline of care for melanoma treatment between SFT and face-to-face (FTF) dermatologic care and identifies potential areas for SFT improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System included 107 patients in the FTF group and 87 patients in the SFT group. Electronic health record data were reviewed and key dates were extracted for patients in each group, including entry into episode of care (EEC), biopsy, and definitive excision. Median and mean intervals were compared between groups. To further analyze the groups, the FTF group was subdivided into where melanomas were entered into care, either at a dermatology clinic (FTF dermatology) or a primary care/nondermatology setting (FTF primary care).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision for patients in the FTF and SFT groups were 58 and 73 days (<i>P</i> = .004), respectively. The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision in the FTF dermatology and FTF primary care groups were 37 and 78 days, respectively. Handoffs in SFT accounted for 6 to 12 days of the total timeline of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fastest timeline of care for primary cutaneous melanoma is obtained when FTF dermatology is the EEC. The SFT timeline is significantly longer than that of FTF. Facilitating handoffs in SFT presents an opportunity for process improvement. The SFT timeline could be improved if the EEC, imaging, and SFT consultation requests all occurred on the same day.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"42 Suppl 2","pages":"S10-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handoff Delays in Teledermatology Lengthen Timeline of Care for Veterans With Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Byrne, Clayton Lau, Maya Gopalan, Sandra Mata-Diaz, Gregory J Raugi\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) involves sending clinical images and patient information to a dermatologist for evaluation and is widely used in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Integrated Service Network 20. While SFT has increased access to dermatologic care, its impact on timely treatment is less well known. This study compares the timeline of care for melanoma treatment between SFT and face-to-face (FTF) dermatologic care and identifies potential areas for SFT improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System included 107 patients in the FTF group and 87 patients in the SFT group. Electronic health record data were reviewed and key dates were extracted for patients in each group, including entry into episode of care (EEC), biopsy, and definitive excision. Median and mean intervals were compared between groups. To further analyze the groups, the FTF group was subdivided into where melanomas were entered into care, either at a dermatology clinic (FTF dermatology) or a primary care/nondermatology setting (FTF primary care).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision for patients in the FTF and SFT groups were 58 and 73 days (<i>P</i> = .004), respectively. The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision in the FTF dermatology and FTF primary care groups were 37 and 78 days, respectively. Handoffs in SFT accounted for 6 to 12 days of the total timeline of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fastest timeline of care for primary cutaneous melanoma is obtained when FTF dermatology is the EEC. The SFT timeline is significantly longer than that of FTF. Facilitating handoffs in SFT presents an opportunity for process improvement. The SFT timeline could be improved if the EEC, imaging, and SFT consultation requests all occurred on the same day.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"42 Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S10-S14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:存储转发远程皮肤病学(SFT)涉及将临床图像和患者信息发送给皮肤科医生进行评估,并广泛应用于美国退伍军人事务部(VA)退伍军人综合服务网络20。虽然SFT增加了获得皮肤科护理的机会,但其对及时治疗的影响却鲜为人知。本研究比较了SFT和面对面(FTF)皮肤科治疗的黑色素瘤治疗时间表,并确定了SFT改善的潜在领域。方法:本研究在VA Puget Sound卫生保健系统纳入FTF组107例患者和SFT组87例患者。我们回顾了每组患者的电子健康记录数据,并提取了关键日期,包括进入护理期(EEC)、活检和最终切除。比较两组间的中位数和平均间隔。为了进一步分析各组,FTF组被细分为黑色素瘤进入治疗的地方,要么在皮肤科诊所(FTF皮肤科),要么在初级保健/非皮肤科环境(FTF初级保健)。结果:FTF组和SFT组患者从EEC到最终切除的中位时间间隔分别为58天和73天(P = 0.004)。FTF皮肤科组和FTF初级护理组从EEC到最终切除的中位时间间隔分别为37天和78天。SFT患者的交接时间占护理总时间的6至12天。结论:当FTF皮肤科是EEC时,获得原发性皮肤黑色素瘤的最快护理时间。SFT的时间轴明显长于FTF。在SFT中促进交接为过程改进提供了机会。如果EEC、成像和SFT咨询请求都发生在同一天,则SFT时间表可以得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handoff Delays in Teledermatology Lengthen Timeline of Care for Veterans With Melanoma.

Background: Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) involves sending clinical images and patient information to a dermatologist for evaluation and is widely used in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Integrated Service Network 20. While SFT has increased access to dermatologic care, its impact on timely treatment is less well known. This study compares the timeline of care for melanoma treatment between SFT and face-to-face (FTF) dermatologic care and identifies potential areas for SFT improvement.

Methods: This study at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System included 107 patients in the FTF group and 87 patients in the SFT group. Electronic health record data were reviewed and key dates were extracted for patients in each group, including entry into episode of care (EEC), biopsy, and definitive excision. Median and mean intervals were compared between groups. To further analyze the groups, the FTF group was subdivided into where melanomas were entered into care, either at a dermatology clinic (FTF dermatology) or a primary care/nondermatology setting (FTF primary care).

Results: The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision for patients in the FTF and SFT groups were 58 and 73 days (P = .004), respectively. The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision in the FTF dermatology and FTF primary care groups were 37 and 78 days, respectively. Handoffs in SFT accounted for 6 to 12 days of the total timeline of care.

Conclusions: The fastest timeline of care for primary cutaneous melanoma is obtained when FTF dermatology is the EEC. The SFT timeline is significantly longer than that of FTF. Facilitating handoffs in SFT presents an opportunity for process improvement. The SFT timeline could be improved if the EEC, imaging, and SFT consultation requests all occurred on the same day.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信