在急诊科使用HEARTRISK6量表诊断急性心力衰竭的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8
Hassan Sheikh, Warren J Cheung, Debra A Eagles, Ian G Stiell
{"title":"在急诊科使用HEARTRISK6量表诊断急性心力衰竭的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究","authors":"Hassan Sheikh, Warren J Cheung, Debra A Eagles, Ian G Stiell","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute heart failure is the second most common reason for return visits to the emergency department (ED) in Canada. Half of all acute heart failure patients presenting to the ED can be discharged, suggesting admission is not always necessary. The HEARTRISK6 Scale was recently developed from prospectively collected data of 2,246 acute heart failure patients from 10 Canadian EDs. This tool comprises six routine ED criteria and aids disposition decisions by estimating the risk of poor outcomes. Currently, it is not known what ED clinicians think of the tool. This study aimed to determine the factors impacting emergency physician use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale, and to identify the relevant opportunities to increase uptake of the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with ED attending and resident physicians at The Ottawa Hospital and nearby community sites. An interview guide based on the theoretical domains framework (TDF) was used to capture factors within the 14 domains that may influence the use of HEARTRISK6. Interview transcripts were coded using direct content analysis, and belief statements were generated to capture similar responses. Relevant and non-relevant domains were identified based on their frequencies, presence of conflicting ideas, and perceived influence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen interviews (thirteen attendings, three residents) were conducted with ED physicians. Eleven of the fourteen TDF domains were identified as relevant. Participants described key facilitators to be teaching about the tool, positive colleague views, increased objectivity of disposition decision, ease of access, and feeling it benefited their work. Desire for more evidence, competing demands, and need for consultant buy-in were noted as important barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key barriers and facilitators to use of HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure patients. These factors provide targets for developing interventions aimed at encouraging routine use of HEARTRISK6 among ED physicians in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure presentations in the emergency department: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Sheikh, Warren J Cheung, Debra A Eagles, Ian G Stiell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute heart failure is the second most common reason for return visits to the emergency department (ED) in Canada. Half of all acute heart failure patients presenting to the ED can be discharged, suggesting admission is not always necessary. The HEARTRISK6 Scale was recently developed from prospectively collected data of 2,246 acute heart failure patients from 10 Canadian EDs. This tool comprises six routine ED criteria and aids disposition decisions by estimating the risk of poor outcomes. Currently, it is not known what ED clinicians think of the tool. This study aimed to determine the factors impacting emergency physician use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale, and to identify the relevant opportunities to increase uptake of the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with ED attending and resident physicians at The Ottawa Hospital and nearby community sites. An interview guide based on the theoretical domains framework (TDF) was used to capture factors within the 14 domains that may influence the use of HEARTRISK6. Interview transcripts were coded using direct content analysis, and belief statements were generated to capture similar responses. Relevant and non-relevant domains were identified based on their frequencies, presence of conflicting ideas, and perceived influence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen interviews (thirteen attendings, three residents) were conducted with ED physicians. Eleven of the fourteen TDF domains were identified as relevant. Participants described key facilitators to be teaching about the tool, positive colleague views, increased objectivity of disposition decision, ease of access, and feeling it benefited their work. Desire for more evidence, competing demands, and need for consultant buy-in were noted as important barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key barriers and facilitators to use of HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure patients. These factors provide targets for developing interventions aimed at encouraging routine use of HEARTRISK6 among ED physicians in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00981-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性心力衰竭是加拿大急诊科(ED)复诊的第二大常见原因。到急诊科就诊的急性心力衰竭患者中有一半可以出院,这表明住院并不总是必要的。HEARTRISK6量表是最近根据加拿大10个急诊科2246名急性心力衰竭患者的前瞻性数据制定的。该工具包括六个常规ED标准,并通过估计不良结果的风险来辅助处置决策。目前,尚不清楚急诊科临床医生对该工具的看法。本研究旨在确定影响急诊医生使用HEARTRISK6量表的因素,并确定增加使用该工具的相关机会。方法:我们对渥太华医院和附近社区的急诊科主治医师和住院医师进行了半结构化访谈。采用基于理论域框架(TDF)的访谈指南来捕捉14个域中可能影响HEARTRISK6使用的因素。使用直接内容分析对访谈记录进行编码,并生成信念陈述以捕获类似的反应。相关和不相关的领域是根据它们的频率、相互冲突的想法的存在和感知的影响来确定的。结果:对急诊科医生进行了16次访谈(13名主治医师,3名住院医师)。14个TDF结构域中有11个被确定为相关的。参与者描述了关于该工具的主要促进者,积极的同事观点,配置决策的客观性增加,访问的便利性,以及感觉它对他们的工作有益。对更多证据的渴望、相互竞争的要求以及需要咨询顾问的支持被认为是重要的障碍。结论:本研究确定了急性心力衰竭患者使用HEARTRISK6量表的关键障碍和促进因素。这些因素为制定干预措施提供了目标,旨在鼓励急诊科医生在临床实践中常规使用HEARTRISK6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure presentations in the emergency department: a qualitative study.

Objective: Acute heart failure is the second most common reason for return visits to the emergency department (ED) in Canada. Half of all acute heart failure patients presenting to the ED can be discharged, suggesting admission is not always necessary. The HEARTRISK6 Scale was recently developed from prospectively collected data of 2,246 acute heart failure patients from 10 Canadian EDs. This tool comprises six routine ED criteria and aids disposition decisions by estimating the risk of poor outcomes. Currently, it is not known what ED clinicians think of the tool. This study aimed to determine the factors impacting emergency physician use of the HEARTRISK6 Scale, and to identify the relevant opportunities to increase uptake of the tool.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with ED attending and resident physicians at The Ottawa Hospital and nearby community sites. An interview guide based on the theoretical domains framework (TDF) was used to capture factors within the 14 domains that may influence the use of HEARTRISK6. Interview transcripts were coded using direct content analysis, and belief statements were generated to capture similar responses. Relevant and non-relevant domains were identified based on their frequencies, presence of conflicting ideas, and perceived influence.

Results: Sixteen interviews (thirteen attendings, three residents) were conducted with ED physicians. Eleven of the fourteen TDF domains were identified as relevant. Participants described key facilitators to be teaching about the tool, positive colleague views, increased objectivity of disposition decision, ease of access, and feeling it benefited their work. Desire for more evidence, competing demands, and need for consultant buy-in were noted as important barriers.

Conclusion: This study identified key barriers and facilitators to use of HEARTRISK6 Scale for acute heart failure patients. These factors provide targets for developing interventions aimed at encouraging routine use of HEARTRISK6 among ED physicians in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信