内窥镜腰椎减压术90天内急诊就诊。

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Philip P Ratnasamy, Sahir S Jabbouri, Gwyneth C Maloy, Arya G Varthi, Daniel R Rubio, Jonathan N Grauer
{"title":"内窥镜腰椎减压术90天内急诊就诊。","authors":"Philip P Ratnasamy, Sahir S Jabbouri, Gwyneth C Maloy, Arya G Varthi, Daniel R Rubio, Jonathan N Grauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Endoscopic lumbar decompression is growing in popularity as an alternative to an open approach for management of lumbar radiculopathy. Although endoscopic procedures are inherently less invasive, emergency department (ED) visits may occur postoperatively. Although many quality improvement initiatives target readmissions, ED visits may be more common, be a marker of quality of care, affect patient satisfaction, and contribute to healthcare resource utilization and costs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the timing and risk factors of ED utilization following single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective database review.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>PearlDiver M165Ortho data set.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Timing of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, independent risk factors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, and revision surgery rate among patients who use the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression patients were identified from the PearlDiver M165Ortho data set. Patients were excluded if additional procedures were performed, if they were younger than 18 years, if they had a concomitant diagnosis of trauma, neoplasm, or infection on the day of surgery, or if there was not 90-day follow-up in the data set. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, region of the country in which their procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and patient insurance plan (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare).The incidence, timing, and frequency of ED utilization within 90 days of endoscopic lumbar decompression was then determined. A baseline rate of weekly ED utilization for the study cohort was calculated based on average weekly ED utilization at 52 to 56 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors predictive of postoperative ED utilization were then determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1397 endoscopic lumbar decompression patients identified, 151 (10.8%) visited the ED within 90 days of surgery. Of note, approximately 29% of these ED visits occurred in the first 2 postoperative weeks.Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, including female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.57 relative to male), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (OR 1.15 per two-point increase), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.49 relative to Medicare).Of patients who visited the ED, 97 (64.2%) were readmitted. Less than 11 patients who used the ED underwent revision surgery in the subsequent 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following endoscopic lumbar decompression, close to 11% of patients were found to visit the ED in the 90 days following their surgery, most commonly in the first two postoperative weeks. Several factors were independently associated with ED utilization, including female sex, greater comorbidity burden, and having Medicaid insurance. Notably, ED utilization rates following endoscopic lumbar decompression are similar to those following open lumbar decompression previously published in the literature. Thus, patients undergoing endoscopic decompression are at similar risk of postoperative ED utilization-surgeons should be aware of this risk and care pathways should be modified to reduce the occurrence of postoperative ED visits in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.\",\"authors\":\"Philip P Ratnasamy, Sahir S Jabbouri, Gwyneth C Maloy, Arya G Varthi, Daniel R Rubio, Jonathan N Grauer\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Endoscopic lumbar decompression is growing in popularity as an alternative to an open approach for management of lumbar radiculopathy. Although endoscopic procedures are inherently less invasive, emergency department (ED) visits may occur postoperatively. Although many quality improvement initiatives target readmissions, ED visits may be more common, be a marker of quality of care, affect patient satisfaction, and contribute to healthcare resource utilization and costs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the timing and risk factors of ED utilization following single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective database review.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>PearlDiver M165Ortho data set.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Timing of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, independent risk factors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, and revision surgery rate among patients who use the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression patients were identified from the PearlDiver M165Ortho data set. Patients were excluded if additional procedures were performed, if they were younger than 18 years, if they had a concomitant diagnosis of trauma, neoplasm, or infection on the day of surgery, or if there was not 90-day follow-up in the data set. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, region of the country in which their procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and patient insurance plan (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare).The incidence, timing, and frequency of ED utilization within 90 days of endoscopic lumbar decompression was then determined. A baseline rate of weekly ED utilization for the study cohort was calculated based on average weekly ED utilization at 52 to 56 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors predictive of postoperative ED utilization were then determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1397 endoscopic lumbar decompression patients identified, 151 (10.8%) visited the ED within 90 days of surgery. Of note, approximately 29% of these ED visits occurred in the first 2 postoperative weeks.Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, including female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.57 relative to male), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (OR 1.15 per two-point increase), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.49 relative to Medicare).Of patients who visited the ED, 97 (64.2%) were readmitted. Less than 11 patients who used the ED underwent revision surgery in the subsequent 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following endoscopic lumbar decompression, close to 11% of patients were found to visit the ED in the 90 days following their surgery, most commonly in the first two postoperative weeks. Several factors were independently associated with ED utilization, including female sex, greater comorbidity burden, and having Medicaid insurance. Notably, ED utilization rates following endoscopic lumbar decompression are similar to those following open lumbar decompression previously published in the literature. Thus, patients undergoing endoscopic decompression are at similar risk of postoperative ED utilization-surgeons should be aware of this risk and care pathways should be modified to reduce the occurrence of postoperative ED visits in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:内窥镜腰椎减压术越来越受欢迎,作为腰椎神经根病治疗的一种替代方法。虽然内窥镜手术本身侵入性较小,但急诊(ED)可能发生在术后。虽然许多质量改进计划的目标是再入院,但急诊科就诊可能更常见,这是护理质量的标志,影响患者满意度,并有助于医疗资源的利用和成本。目的:探讨内镜下单节段腰椎减压术后ED应用的时机和危险因素。研究设计/设置:回顾性数据库审查。患者样本:PearlDiver M165Ortho数据集。结果测量:内窥镜腰椎减压术后使用ED的时间,内窥镜腰椎减压术后使用ED的独立危险因素,以及使用ED的患者的翻修手术率。方法:从PearlDiver M165Ortho数据集中确定单节段内窥镜腰椎减压患者。如果患者进行了额外的手术,如果他们年龄小于18岁,如果他们在手术当天伴有创伤、肿瘤或感染的诊断,或者如果数据集中没有90天的随访,则患者被排除在外。提取患者因素,包括年龄、性别、Elixhauser合并症指数、进行手术的国家地区(中西部、东北部、南部、西部)和患者保险计划(商业、医疗补助、医疗保险)。然后确定内镜腰椎减压术90天内ED的发生率、时间和使用频率。研究队列的每周ED使用率基线率是根据术后52至56周的平均每周ED使用率计算的。然后通过单因素和多因素分析确定预测术后ED使用的患者因素。结果:在1397例内镜下腰椎减压患者中,151例(10.8%)在手术后90天内就诊。值得注意的是,大约29%的急诊科就诊发生在术后前两周。多变量分析揭示了内镜腰椎减压术后ED使用的几个独立预测因素,包括女性(相对于男性的比值比[OR]为1.57)、较高的Elixhauser合并症指数(比值比为1.15 / 2点)和医疗补助覆盖率(相对于医疗保险的比值比为2.49)。在访问急诊科的患者中,97例(64.2%)再次入院。少于11例使用ED的患者在随后的2周内接受了翻修手术。结论:内镜下腰椎减压术后,近11%的患者在术后90天内就诊,最常见的是在术后前两周。有几个因素与ED的使用独立相关,包括女性性别、更大的合并症负担和是否有医疗保险。值得注意的是,内窥镜腰椎减压术后ED的使用率与先前文献中发表的开放式腰椎减压术相似。因此,接受内窥镜减压的患者术后使用ED的风险相似,外科医生应意识到这一风险,并应修改护理路径以减少这一人群术后ED就诊的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.

Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.

Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.

Background context: Endoscopic lumbar decompression is growing in popularity as an alternative to an open approach for management of lumbar radiculopathy. Although endoscopic procedures are inherently less invasive, emergency department (ED) visits may occur postoperatively. Although many quality improvement initiatives target readmissions, ED visits may be more common, be a marker of quality of care, affect patient satisfaction, and contribute to healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Purpose: To characterize the timing and risk factors of ED utilization following single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression.

Study design/setting: Retrospective database review.

Patient sample: PearlDiver M165Ortho data set.

Outcome measures: Timing of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, independent risk factors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, and revision surgery rate among patients who use the ED.

Methods: Single-level endoscopic lumbar decompression patients were identified from the PearlDiver M165Ortho data set. Patients were excluded if additional procedures were performed, if they were younger than 18 years, if they had a concomitant diagnosis of trauma, neoplasm, or infection on the day of surgery, or if there was not 90-day follow-up in the data set. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, region of the country in which their procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and patient insurance plan (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare).The incidence, timing, and frequency of ED utilization within 90 days of endoscopic lumbar decompression was then determined. A baseline rate of weekly ED utilization for the study cohort was calculated based on average weekly ED utilization at 52 to 56 weeks postoperatively. Patient factors predictive of postoperative ED utilization were then determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Of 1397 endoscopic lumbar decompression patients identified, 151 (10.8%) visited the ED within 90 days of surgery. Of note, approximately 29% of these ED visits occurred in the first 2 postoperative weeks.Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of ED utilization following endoscopic lumbar decompression, including female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.57 relative to male), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (OR 1.15 per two-point increase), and Medicaid coverage (OR 2.49 relative to Medicare).Of patients who visited the ED, 97 (64.2%) were readmitted. Less than 11 patients who used the ED underwent revision surgery in the subsequent 2 weeks.

Conclusions: Following endoscopic lumbar decompression, close to 11% of patients were found to visit the ED in the 90 days following their surgery, most commonly in the first two postoperative weeks. Several factors were independently associated with ED utilization, including female sex, greater comorbidity burden, and having Medicaid insurance. Notably, ED utilization rates following endoscopic lumbar decompression are similar to those following open lumbar decompression previously published in the literature. Thus, patients undergoing endoscopic decompression are at similar risk of postoperative ED utilization-surgeons should be aware of this risk and care pathways should be modified to reduce the occurrence of postoperative ED visits in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信