两年内呼出一氧化氮稳定性与COPD结果的关系。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Marieann Högman, Christer Janson, Andreas Palm, Björn Ställberg, Kristina Bröms, Karin Lisspers, Maria Hårdstedt, Amir Farkhooy, Andrei Malinovschi
{"title":"两年内呼出一氧化氮稳定性与COPD结果的关系。","authors":"Marieann Högman, Christer Janson, Andreas Palm, Björn Ställberg, Kristina Bröms, Karin Lisspers, Maria Hårdstedt, Amir Farkhooy, Andrei Malinovschi","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/adfd04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The non-invasive biological marker exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>) is increasingly used in asthma, but its clinical role in COPD is less established. FE<sub>NO</sub>has been reported to be both high and low outside the COPD exacerbation period. The study aimed to follow FE<sub>NO</sub>values over two years during stable conditions in a cohort of COPD subjects participating in the TIE-study (Tools Identifying Exacerbation). The follow-up study included 353 subjects who attended three visits one year apart. The subjects that were ex-smokers (<i>n</i>= 265) had higher FE<sub>NO,50</sub>values (median and IQR) compared with current smokers (<i>n</i>= 88), at inclusion 15 (10, 24) versus 9 (7, 15) ppb, after one year 15 (10, 24) versus 10 (7, 18) ppb, and after two years 14 (9, 22) versus 10 (7, 17) ppb, all<i>p</i>< 0.001. All subjects were further divided into two FE<sub>NO</sub>groups: <20 ppb (72%) and ⩾20 ppb (28%). After one year, 81% of the participants remained in the low group and 65% in the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group. After two years, 71% remained in the low group and 52% in the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group. The persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>group had statistically significantly lower FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred and FVC%pred compared to the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group for all three visits. Among the ex-smokers, the proportion of subjects reporting dyspnoea (mMRC ⩾ 2) was higher in the persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>group than in the persistent high FE<sub>NO</sub>group at all three visits. In conclusion, good consistency in FE<sub>NO</sub>over two years is promising for monitoring FE<sub>NO</sub>during stable disease. COPD subjects with persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>had poorer lung function and reported more dyspnoea than subjects with persistent high FE<sub>NO</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exhaled nitric oxide stability over two years in relation to COPD outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Marieann Högman, Christer Janson, Andreas Palm, Björn Ställberg, Kristina Bröms, Karin Lisspers, Maria Hårdstedt, Amir Farkhooy, Andrei Malinovschi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1752-7163/adfd04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The non-invasive biological marker exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>) is increasingly used in asthma, but its clinical role in COPD is less established. FE<sub>NO</sub>has been reported to be both high and low outside the COPD exacerbation period. The study aimed to follow FE<sub>NO</sub>values over two years during stable conditions in a cohort of COPD subjects participating in the TIE-study (Tools Identifying Exacerbation). The follow-up study included 353 subjects who attended three visits one year apart. The subjects that were ex-smokers (<i>n</i>= 265) had higher FE<sub>NO,50</sub>values (median and IQR) compared with current smokers (<i>n</i>= 88), at inclusion 15 (10, 24) versus 9 (7, 15) ppb, after one year 15 (10, 24) versus 10 (7, 18) ppb, and after two years 14 (9, 22) versus 10 (7, 17) ppb, all<i>p</i>< 0.001. All subjects were further divided into two FE<sub>NO</sub>groups: <20 ppb (72%) and ⩾20 ppb (28%). After one year, 81% of the participants remained in the low group and 65% in the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group. After two years, 71% remained in the low group and 52% in the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group. The persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>group had statistically significantly lower FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred and FVC%pred compared to the high FE<sub>NO</sub>group for all three visits. Among the ex-smokers, the proportion of subjects reporting dyspnoea (mMRC ⩾ 2) was higher in the persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>group than in the persistent high FE<sub>NO</sub>group at all three visits. In conclusion, good consistency in FE<sub>NO</sub>over two years is promising for monitoring FE<sub>NO</sub>during stable disease. COPD subjects with persistent low FE<sub>NO</sub>had poorer lung function and reported more dyspnoea than subjects with persistent high FE<sub>NO</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adfd04\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adfd04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无创生物标志物呼出一氧化氮(FENO)在哮喘中的应用越来越多,但其在COPD中的临床作用尚不明确。据报道,在COPD加重期之外,feno既有高也有低。该研究的目的是在参与tie研究(工具识别恶化)的COPD受试者队列中,在稳定状态下跟踪feno值超过两年。随访研究包括353名受试者,他们每一年进行三次访问。前吸烟者(n=265)与当前吸烟者(n=88)相比,纳入时FENO,50值(中位数和IQR)更高,一年后15(10,24)比9 (7,15)ppb,一年后15(10,24)比10 (7,18)ppb,两年后14(9,22)比10 (7,17)ppb,所有pno组:no组。两年后,低feno组为71%,高feno组为52%。与高feno组相比,持续低feno组在所有三次就诊中FEV1%pred和FVC%pred均有统计学意义上显著降低。在戒烟者中,三次随访中,持续低feno组报告呼吸困难(mMRC≥2)的比例高于持续高feno组。总之,在两年多的时间里,feno的良好一致性有望用于监测feno稳定的疾病。持续低FENO的COPD患者肺功能较差,与持续高FENO的患者相比,报告了更多的呼吸困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exhaled nitric oxide stability over two years in relation to COPD outcomes.

The non-invasive biological marker exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is increasingly used in asthma, but its clinical role in COPD is less established. FENOhas been reported to be both high and low outside the COPD exacerbation period. The study aimed to follow FENOvalues over two years during stable conditions in a cohort of COPD subjects participating in the TIE-study (Tools Identifying Exacerbation). The follow-up study included 353 subjects who attended three visits one year apart. The subjects that were ex-smokers (n= 265) had higher FENO,50values (median and IQR) compared with current smokers (n= 88), at inclusion 15 (10, 24) versus 9 (7, 15) ppb, after one year 15 (10, 24) versus 10 (7, 18) ppb, and after two years 14 (9, 22) versus 10 (7, 17) ppb, allp< 0.001. All subjects were further divided into two FENOgroups: <20 ppb (72%) and ⩾20 ppb (28%). After one year, 81% of the participants remained in the low group and 65% in the high FENOgroup. After two years, 71% remained in the low group and 52% in the high FENOgroup. The persistent low FENOgroup had statistically significantly lower FEV1%pred and FVC%pred compared to the high FENOgroup for all three visits. Among the ex-smokers, the proportion of subjects reporting dyspnoea (mMRC ⩾ 2) was higher in the persistent low FENOgroup than in the persistent high FENOgroup at all three visits. In conclusion, good consistency in FENOover two years is promising for monitoring FENOduring stable disease. COPD subjects with persistent low FENOhad poorer lung function and reported more dyspnoea than subjects with persistent high FENO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信