使用孟德尔随机化和父母痴呆作为英国生物银行的工具变量,探索临床前阿尔茨海默病对血压的影响。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jennifer C Palmer, Emma Hart, Emma Anderson, Seth Love, Deborah A Lawlor
{"title":"使用孟德尔随机化和父母痴呆作为英国生物银行的工具变量,探索临床前阿尔茨海默病对血压的影响。","authors":"Jennifer C Palmer, Emma Hart, Emma Anderson, Seth Love, Deborah A Lawlor","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04295-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests there may be a bidirectional relationship between high blood pressure (BP) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is hypothesised that this is due to cerebral changes during pre-clinical AD that cause elevation of systemic BP. We aimed to test this by exploring the effect of risk of pre-clinical AD on blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the UK Biobank, including adults without prevalent or incident (within first 5 years of follow-up) clinical AD (N = 501,420, mean age 56.6, SD 8 years). We used two instrumental variables, an age-weighted parental dementia instrument score and a participant genetic instrument score, that are vulnerable to differing biases, to instrument risk of pre-clinical AD (the exposure). We tested the association of both instrument scores with systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and hypertension. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore different biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the higher parental dementia instrument and participant genetic instrument score were associated with higher mean SBP (difference in mean SBP mmHg per 1SD higher score: 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.17, p < 0.0001, and 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.13, p=0.037, respectively) but not DBP. Sensitivity analyses were largely consistent with these findings.  CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pre-clinical AD increases SBP. Further research is required to determine whether this increase in SBP is due to increased cerebrovascular resistance as a result of pre-clinical AD. Obtaining a better understanding of the changing relationship with BP at different stages of AD may enable effective optimisation and targeting of therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"483"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the effect of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease on blood pressure using Mendelian randomisation and parental dementia as an instrumental variable in UK Biobank.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer C Palmer, Emma Hart, Emma Anderson, Seth Love, Deborah A Lawlor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04295-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests there may be a bidirectional relationship between high blood pressure (BP) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is hypothesised that this is due to cerebral changes during pre-clinical AD that cause elevation of systemic BP. We aimed to test this by exploring the effect of risk of pre-clinical AD on blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the UK Biobank, including adults without prevalent or incident (within first 5 years of follow-up) clinical AD (N = 501,420, mean age 56.6, SD 8 years). We used two instrumental variables, an age-weighted parental dementia instrument score and a participant genetic instrument score, that are vulnerable to differing biases, to instrument risk of pre-clinical AD (the exposure). We tested the association of both instrument scores with systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and hypertension. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore different biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the higher parental dementia instrument and participant genetic instrument score were associated with higher mean SBP (difference in mean SBP mmHg per 1SD higher score: 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.17, p < 0.0001, and 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.13, p=0.037, respectively) but not DBP. Sensitivity analyses were largely consistent with these findings.  CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pre-clinical AD increases SBP. Further research is required to determine whether this increase in SBP is due to increased cerebrovascular resistance as a result of pre-clinical AD. Obtaining a better understanding of the changing relationship with BP at different stages of AD may enable effective optimisation and targeting of therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366137/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04295-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04295-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有证据表明高血压(BP)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)之间可能存在双向关系。据推测,这是由于临床前AD期间大脑的变化导致全身血压升高。我们的目的是通过探讨临床前AD风险对血压的影响来验证这一点。方法:我们使用来自UK Biobank的数据,包括没有流行或发生临床AD(随访前5年内)的成年人(N = 501,420,平均年龄56.6,SD 8岁)。我们使用了两个工具变量,年龄加权的父母痴呆工具评分和参与者遗传工具评分,它们容易受到不同偏差的影响,以及临床前AD(暴露)的工具风险。我们测试了两种仪器评分与收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和高血压的关系。进行敏感性分析以探索不同的偏差。结果:较高的父母痴呆仪器评分和参与者遗传仪器评分均与较高的平均收缩压相关(每1SD评分较高的平均收缩压mmHg差异:0.12,95% CI 0.06至0.17,p < 0.0001, 0.07, 95% CI 0.00至0.13,p=0.037),但与舒张压无关。敏感性分析与这些发现基本一致。结论:我们的研究结果提供了临床前AD增加收缩压的初步证据。需要进一步的研究来确定收缩压的增加是否是由于临床前AD导致的脑血管阻力增加。更好地了解阿尔茨海默病不同阶段与血压的变化关系,可能有助于有效地优化和靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the effect of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease on blood pressure using Mendelian randomisation and parental dementia as an instrumental variable in UK Biobank.

Exploring the effect of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease on blood pressure using Mendelian randomisation and parental dementia as an instrumental variable in UK Biobank.

Exploring the effect of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease on blood pressure using Mendelian randomisation and parental dementia as an instrumental variable in UK Biobank.

Exploring the effect of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease on blood pressure using Mendelian randomisation and parental dementia as an instrumental variable in UK Biobank.

Background: Evidence suggests there may be a bidirectional relationship between high blood pressure (BP) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is hypothesised that this is due to cerebral changes during pre-clinical AD that cause elevation of systemic BP. We aimed to test this by exploring the effect of risk of pre-clinical AD on blood pressure.

Methods: We used data from the UK Biobank, including adults without prevalent or incident (within first 5 years of follow-up) clinical AD (N = 501,420, mean age 56.6, SD 8 years). We used two instrumental variables, an age-weighted parental dementia instrument score and a participant genetic instrument score, that are vulnerable to differing biases, to instrument risk of pre-clinical AD (the exposure). We tested the association of both instrument scores with systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and hypertension. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore different biases.

Results: Both the higher parental dementia instrument and participant genetic instrument score were associated with higher mean SBP (difference in mean SBP mmHg per 1SD higher score: 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.17, p < 0.0001, and 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.13, p=0.037, respectively) but not DBP. Sensitivity analyses were largely consistent with these findings.  CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pre-clinical AD increases SBP. Further research is required to determine whether this increase in SBP is due to increased cerebrovascular resistance as a result of pre-clinical AD. Obtaining a better understanding of the changing relationship with BP at different stages of AD may enable effective optimisation and targeting of therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信