视觉经验在触觉空间知觉中的作用:来自早期失明、晚期失明和视力正常个体的证据。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lara A Coelho, Daniela E Aguilar Ramirez, Serena Basta, Marta Guarischi, Claudia L R Gonzalez, Monica Gori
{"title":"视觉经验在触觉空间知觉中的作用:来自早期失明、晚期失明和视力正常个体的证据。","authors":"Lara A Coelho, Daniela E Aguilar Ramirez, Serena Basta, Marta Guarischi, Claudia L R Gonzalez, Monica Gori","doi":"10.1186/s13293-025-00747-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is contradictory evidence on the effect that visual experience has on haptic abilities. Indeed, some studies have documented that a lack of vision (blindness) results in decreased haptic perception, whereas other studies report an enhanced haptic ability in blind individuals. To examine the role of vision in haptic spatial processing, we recruited early blind, late blind, and sighted participants. Each participant completed a haptic task in which they explored a two-piece LEGO model for eight seconds before searching for the same pieces in a bowl of distractors. Our results showed that blind individuals made more errors than sighted participants. Furthermore, early blind participants performed worse than both late blind and sighted participants, who performed similarly. These findings highlight the importance that vision plays in the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. Additionally, we investigated whether the commonly reported male advantage in haptic tasks depends on visual experience. Our results showed better performance by males in all groups when compared to females. This result suggests that sex differences in haptic spatial processing are a fundamental characteristic of human sensory function, independent of visual experience.Highlights No study has investigated if the previously identified male advantage in haptic spatial processing is mediated by visual experience. Blind participants made more errors than sighted participants; early blind performed the worst. The findings suggest vision is crucial for the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. There was a consistent male advantage in haptic performance across all visual experience groups. Sex differences in haptic spatial ability appear to be independent of visual expertise. Plain language summarySome researchers have suggested that being blind reduces abilities in their other senses, while others believe that a lack of vision can improve them. To further understand which is true, we investigated whether the haptic system-the combination of touch and proprioception (awareness of where the body is in space)-is affected by blindness. To do this, we tested people who were blind from birth (early blind), people who became blind later in life (late blind), and people who can see (sighted) on a simple haptic task. In the task, participants felt a small LEGO model with their hands for eight seconds. Then, they had to find the same LEGO pieces in a bowl filled with other, distractor pieces-using only haptics. We found that blind participants made more mistakes than sighted participants. Those who were blind from birth had the most difficulty. People who became blind later in life performed similarly to sighted individuals. This suggests that vision plays an important role in developing accurate haptic perception. As previous work has shown that males outperform females on haptic tasks, we also investigated whether those differences depended on vision. We found that males performed better than females in all groups, regardless of whether they were blind or sighted. This suggests that sex differences in haptic ability may be a basic feature of how our senses work and not just related to vision.</p>","PeriodicalId":8890,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sex Differences","volume":"16 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of visual experience in haptic spatial perception: evidence from early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Lara A Coelho, Daniela E Aguilar Ramirez, Serena Basta, Marta Guarischi, Claudia L R Gonzalez, Monica Gori\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13293-025-00747-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is contradictory evidence on the effect that visual experience has on haptic abilities. Indeed, some studies have documented that a lack of vision (blindness) results in decreased haptic perception, whereas other studies report an enhanced haptic ability in blind individuals. To examine the role of vision in haptic spatial processing, we recruited early blind, late blind, and sighted participants. Each participant completed a haptic task in which they explored a two-piece LEGO model for eight seconds before searching for the same pieces in a bowl of distractors. Our results showed that blind individuals made more errors than sighted participants. Furthermore, early blind participants performed worse than both late blind and sighted participants, who performed similarly. These findings highlight the importance that vision plays in the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. Additionally, we investigated whether the commonly reported male advantage in haptic tasks depends on visual experience. Our results showed better performance by males in all groups when compared to females. This result suggests that sex differences in haptic spatial processing are a fundamental characteristic of human sensory function, independent of visual experience.Highlights No study has investigated if the previously identified male advantage in haptic spatial processing is mediated by visual experience. Blind participants made more errors than sighted participants; early blind performed the worst. The findings suggest vision is crucial for the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. There was a consistent male advantage in haptic performance across all visual experience groups. Sex differences in haptic spatial ability appear to be independent of visual expertise. Plain language summarySome researchers have suggested that being blind reduces abilities in their other senses, while others believe that a lack of vision can improve them. To further understand which is true, we investigated whether the haptic system-the combination of touch and proprioception (awareness of where the body is in space)-is affected by blindness. To do this, we tested people who were blind from birth (early blind), people who became blind later in life (late blind), and people who can see (sighted) on a simple haptic task. In the task, participants felt a small LEGO model with their hands for eight seconds. Then, they had to find the same LEGO pieces in a bowl filled with other, distractor pieces-using only haptics. We found that blind participants made more mistakes than sighted participants. Those who were blind from birth had the most difficulty. People who became blind later in life performed similarly to sighted individuals. This suggests that vision plays an important role in developing accurate haptic perception. As previous work has shown that males outperform females on haptic tasks, we also investigated whether those differences depended on vision. We found that males performed better than females in all groups, regardless of whether they were blind or sighted. This suggests that sex differences in haptic ability may be a basic feature of how our senses work and not just related to vision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sex Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00747-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sex Differences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-025-00747-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于视觉经验对触觉能力的影响,有相互矛盾的证据。事实上,一些研究已经证明,缺乏视力(失明)会导致触觉感知下降,而另一些研究则报告了盲人的触觉能力增强。为了研究视觉在触觉空间加工中的作用,我们招募了早期失明、晚期失明和视力正常的参与者。每个参与者都完成了一项触觉任务,他们先用8秒钟的时间探索一个两件乐高模型,然后在一碗分心物中寻找相同的积木。我们的研究结果表明,盲人比视力正常的人犯更多的错误。此外,早期失明的参与者比后期失明和视力正常的参与者表现更差,后者的表现相似。这些发现强调了视觉在发展准确的触觉空间感知中的重要性。此外,我们调查了通常报道的男性在触觉任务中的优势是否取决于视觉经验。我们的研究结果显示,与女性相比,男性在所有群体中的表现都更好。这一结果表明,触觉空间处理的性别差异是人类感觉功能的基本特征,独立于视觉经验。尚未有研究调查先前确定的男性在触觉空间处理方面的优势是否由视觉经验介导。盲人参与者比视力正常的参与者犯更多的错误;早期失明表现最差。研究结果表明,视觉对于发展准确的触觉空间感知至关重要。在所有视觉体验组中,男性在触觉表现上都有一致的优势。触觉空间能力的性别差异似乎与视觉技能无关。一些研究人员认为,失明会降低他们其他感官的能力,而另一些人则认为,失明可以提高他们的其他感官能力。为了进一步了解哪一个是正确的,我们调查了触觉系统——触觉和本体感觉(身体在空间中的位置的意识)的结合——是否会受到失明的影响。为了做到这一点,我们测试了出生时就失明的人(早期失明),后来失明的人(晚期失明),以及能看见的人(有视力的)进行简单的触觉任务。在这项任务中,参与者用手触摸一个小的乐高模型8秒钟。然后,他们必须在一个装满其他分散注意力的乐高积木的碗里找到相同的乐高积木——只使用触觉。我们发现盲人参与者比视力正常的参与者犯更多的错误。那些天生失明的人面临的困难最大。晚年失明的人与视力正常的人表现相似。这表明视觉在发展准确的触觉感知中起着重要作用。正如先前的研究表明,男性在触觉任务上的表现优于女性,我们也调查了这些差异是否取决于视觉。我们发现,无论他们是失明还是视力正常,男性在所有小组中的表现都比女性好。这表明,触觉能力的性别差异可能是我们感官工作的基本特征,而不仅仅与视觉有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of visual experience in haptic spatial perception: evidence from early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals.

The role of visual experience in haptic spatial perception: evidence from early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals.

The role of visual experience in haptic spatial perception: evidence from early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals.

The role of visual experience in haptic spatial perception: evidence from early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals.

There is contradictory evidence on the effect that visual experience has on haptic abilities. Indeed, some studies have documented that a lack of vision (blindness) results in decreased haptic perception, whereas other studies report an enhanced haptic ability in blind individuals. To examine the role of vision in haptic spatial processing, we recruited early blind, late blind, and sighted participants. Each participant completed a haptic task in which they explored a two-piece LEGO model for eight seconds before searching for the same pieces in a bowl of distractors. Our results showed that blind individuals made more errors than sighted participants. Furthermore, early blind participants performed worse than both late blind and sighted participants, who performed similarly. These findings highlight the importance that vision plays in the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. Additionally, we investigated whether the commonly reported male advantage in haptic tasks depends on visual experience. Our results showed better performance by males in all groups when compared to females. This result suggests that sex differences in haptic spatial processing are a fundamental characteristic of human sensory function, independent of visual experience.Highlights No study has investigated if the previously identified male advantage in haptic spatial processing is mediated by visual experience. Blind participants made more errors than sighted participants; early blind performed the worst. The findings suggest vision is crucial for the development of accurate haptic spatial perception. There was a consistent male advantage in haptic performance across all visual experience groups. Sex differences in haptic spatial ability appear to be independent of visual expertise. Plain language summarySome researchers have suggested that being blind reduces abilities in their other senses, while others believe that a lack of vision can improve them. To further understand which is true, we investigated whether the haptic system-the combination of touch and proprioception (awareness of where the body is in space)-is affected by blindness. To do this, we tested people who were blind from birth (early blind), people who became blind later in life (late blind), and people who can see (sighted) on a simple haptic task. In the task, participants felt a small LEGO model with their hands for eight seconds. Then, they had to find the same LEGO pieces in a bowl filled with other, distractor pieces-using only haptics. We found that blind participants made more mistakes than sighted participants. Those who were blind from birth had the most difficulty. People who became blind later in life performed similarly to sighted individuals. This suggests that vision plays an important role in developing accurate haptic perception. As previous work has shown that males outperform females on haptic tasks, we also investigated whether those differences depended on vision. We found that males performed better than females in all groups, regardless of whether they were blind or sighted. This suggests that sex differences in haptic ability may be a basic feature of how our senses work and not just related to vision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sex Differences
Biology of Sex Differences ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sex Differences is a unique scientific journal focusing on sex differences in physiology, behavior, and disease from molecular to phenotypic levels, incorporating both basic and clinical research. The journal aims to enhance understanding of basic principles and facilitate the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools specific to sex differences. As an open-access journal, it is the official publication of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences and co-published by the Society for Women's Health Research. Topical areas include, but are not limited to sex differences in: genomics; the microbiome; epigenetics; molecular and cell biology; tissue biology; physiology; interaction of tissue systems, in any system including adipose, behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, muscular, neural, renal, and skeletal; clinical studies bearing on sex differences in disease or response to therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信