在医疗过程中使用带音乐的隔音喷雾器和添加有趣面具以减少儿童焦虑的效果:一项随机对照实验研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eda Sorkun, Ayfer Açıkgöz, Sarper Şahin
{"title":"在医疗过程中使用带音乐的隔音喷雾器和添加有趣面具以减少儿童焦虑的效果:一项随机对照实验研究","authors":"Eda Sorkun,&nbsp;Ayfer Açıkgöz,&nbsp;Sarper Şahin","doi":"10.1111/jep.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Medical procedures are a common source of anxiety, and nebulized therapy may increase children's anxiety levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine whether using a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask reduces anxiety during nebulized therapy in children aged 3–6 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This randomized controlled interventional study included three groups: Experimental Group 1, where a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask was used; Experimental Group 2, where a silent nebulizer without additional features was used; and a Control Group, where a standard nebulizer routinely employed in the clinic was applied. Data were collected using a Descriptive Information Form, the Children's Fear Scale (CFS) and the Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale (CEMS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the procedure, the Control Group had higher CFS scores than both Experimental Groups 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Experimental Group 2 showed higher CFS scores than Experimental Group 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Similarly, CEMS scores were higher in the Control Group compared to both experimental groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicate that using a soundproof nebulizer combined with music and a funny mask is the most effective method to reduce children's fear during inhalation therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>NCT05881941.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Using Soundproof Nebulizers With Music and a Funny Mask Added to Reduce Children's Anxiety in Medical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Eda Sorkun,&nbsp;Ayfer Açıkgöz,&nbsp;Sarper Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical procedures are a common source of anxiety, and nebulized therapy may increase children's anxiety levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to determine whether using a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask reduces anxiety during nebulized therapy in children aged 3–6 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This randomized controlled interventional study included three groups: Experimental Group 1, where a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask was used; Experimental Group 2, where a silent nebulizer without additional features was used; and a Control Group, where a standard nebulizer routinely employed in the clinic was applied. Data were collected using a Descriptive Information Form, the Children's Fear Scale (CFS) and the Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale (CEMS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the procedure, the Control Group had higher CFS scores than both Experimental Groups 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Experimental Group 2 showed higher CFS scores than Experimental Group 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Similarly, CEMS scores were higher in the Control Group compared to both experimental groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings indicate that using a soundproof nebulizer combined with music and a funny mask is the most effective method to reduce children's fear during inhalation therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>NCT05881941.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗程序是焦虑的常见来源,雾化治疗可能会增加儿童的焦虑水平。目的本研究旨在确定在雾化治疗期间使用带音乐和滑稽面具的隔音喷雾器是否能减少3-6岁儿童的焦虑。方法随机对照介入研究分为三组:实验组1,使用带音乐的隔音雾化器和搞笑口罩;实验组2,使用无附加功能的静音雾化器;另一组是对照组,使用临床常规使用的标准雾化器。使用描述性信息表、儿童恐惧量表(CFS)和儿童情绪表现量表(CEMS)收集数据。结果在手术过程中,对照组的CFS评分高于实验组1和实验组2 (p < 0.001)。实验2组CFS评分高于实验1组(p < 0.001)。同样,对照组的CEMS评分高于两个实验组(p < 0.001)。研究结果表明,使用隔音喷雾器结合音乐和滑稽口罩是减少儿童吸入治疗中恐惧的最有效方法。试验注册编号NCT05881941。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Using Soundproof Nebulizers With Music and a Funny Mask Added to Reduce Children's Anxiety in Medical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study

Introduction

Medical procedures are a common source of anxiety, and nebulized therapy may increase children's anxiety levels.

Aims

This study aimed to determine whether using a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask reduces anxiety during nebulized therapy in children aged 3–6 years.

Methods

This randomized controlled interventional study included three groups: Experimental Group 1, where a soundproof nebulizer with music and a funny mask was used; Experimental Group 2, where a silent nebulizer without additional features was used; and a Control Group, where a standard nebulizer routinely employed in the clinic was applied. Data were collected using a Descriptive Information Form, the Children's Fear Scale (CFS) and the Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale (CEMS).

Results

During the procedure, the Control Group had higher CFS scores than both Experimental Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). Experimental Group 2 showed higher CFS scores than Experimental Group 1 (p < 0.001). Similarly, CEMS scores were higher in the Control Group compared to both experimental groups (p < 0.001).

Discussion

The findings indicate that using a soundproof nebulizer combined with music and a funny mask is the most effective method to reduce children's fear during inhalation therapy.

Trial Registration

NCT05881941.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信