{"title":"风险孕妇如何获得积极的产前体验:连贯性感、产前窘迫和妊娠接受度的横断面研究","authors":"Ayse Deliktas Demirci, Mine Oruc, Merve Kochan Aksoy, Kamile Kabukcuoglu","doi":"10.1111/jep.70255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Antenatal care incorporating a health-promoting approach should focus on positive pregnancy experiences. This approach can bring pregnant women closer to the health dimension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the effects and explanatory power of sense of coherence and prenatal distress on pregnancy acceptance among high-risk pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and October 2023. The sample included 219 high-risk pregnant women who had high-risk pregnancies and were admitted to prenatal clinics at a state hospital. <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and hierarchical linear multiple regression were performed using IBM SPSS software version 23.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This study indicated that high-risk pregnant women exhibited moderate levels of sense of coherence (54.43 ± 7.49), high acceptance of pregnancy (24.53 ± 5.83), and low levels of prenatal distress (11.63 ± 4.96). The research findings showed that acceptance of pregnancy was influenced by the wanted pregnancy status (<i>β</i> = 0.231, <i>p</i> = 0.002), prenatal distress (<i>β</i> = 0.275, <i>p </i>= 0.000), and sense of coherence levels of women (<i>β</i> = −0.206, <i>p </i>= 0.001). The explanatory power of the model was 34% (<i>F</i> = 5.250, <i>p</i> = 0.000).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The research revealed a strong link between the acceptance of pregnancy and factors such as the desired status of the pregnancy, prenatal stress, and a sense of coherence. These findings highlight key psychosocial predictors of pregnancy acceptance in high-risk pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70255","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Risky Pregnant Women Achieve Positive Antenatal Experience: A Cross-Sectional Study of Examination of the Sense of Coherence, Prenatal Distress, and Pregnancy Acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Ayse Deliktas Demirci, Mine Oruc, Merve Kochan Aksoy, Kamile Kabukcuoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Antenatal care incorporating a health-promoting approach should focus on positive pregnancy experiences. This approach can bring pregnant women closer to the health dimension.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the effects and explanatory power of sense of coherence and prenatal distress on pregnancy acceptance among high-risk pregnancies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and October 2023. The sample included 219 high-risk pregnant women who had high-risk pregnancies and were admitted to prenatal clinics at a state hospital. <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and hierarchical linear multiple regression were performed using IBM SPSS software version 23.0.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study indicated that high-risk pregnant women exhibited moderate levels of sense of coherence (54.43 ± 7.49), high acceptance of pregnancy (24.53 ± 5.83), and low levels of prenatal distress (11.63 ± 4.96). The research findings showed that acceptance of pregnancy was influenced by the wanted pregnancy status (<i>β</i> = 0.231, <i>p</i> = 0.002), prenatal distress (<i>β</i> = 0.275, <i>p </i>= 0.000), and sense of coherence levels of women (<i>β</i> = −0.206, <i>p </i>= 0.001). The explanatory power of the model was 34% (<i>F</i> = 5.250, <i>p</i> = 0.000).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The research revealed a strong link between the acceptance of pregnancy and factors such as the desired status of the pregnancy, prenatal stress, and a sense of coherence. These findings highlight key psychosocial predictors of pregnancy acceptance in high-risk pregnancies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70255\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
理由:采用促进健康方法的产前保健应侧重于积极的怀孕经历。这种方法可以使孕妇更接近健康层面。目的和目的探讨一致性感和产前窘迫对高危妊娠接受的影响及解释力。方法于2023年4 - 10月进行描述性横断面调查。样本包括219名高危孕妇,她们曾在一家州立医院的产前诊所接受过高危妊娠。采用IBM SPSS 23.0软件进行t检验、方差分析、Pearson相关系数和层次线性多元回归分析。结果高危孕妇的连贯性感中等(54.43±7.49),妊娠接受度高(24.53±5.83),产前窘迫程度低(11.63±4.96)。研究结果表明,女性对怀孕的接受程度受希望怀孕状态(β = 0.231, p = 0.002)、产前窘迫(β = 0.275, p = 0.000)和连贯感水平(β = - 0.206, p = 0.001)的影响。模型的解释能力为34% (F = 5.250, p = 0.000)。该研究揭示了对怀孕的接受程度与诸如期望的怀孕状态、产前压力和连贯性感等因素之间的密切联系。这些发现强调了高危妊娠接受度的关键社会心理预测因素。
How Risky Pregnant Women Achieve Positive Antenatal Experience: A Cross-Sectional Study of Examination of the Sense of Coherence, Prenatal Distress, and Pregnancy Acceptance
Rationale
Antenatal care incorporating a health-promoting approach should focus on positive pregnancy experiences. This approach can bring pregnant women closer to the health dimension.
Aims and Objectives
To examine the effects and explanatory power of sense of coherence and prenatal distress on pregnancy acceptance among high-risk pregnancies.
Methods
A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and October 2023. The sample included 219 high-risk pregnant women who had high-risk pregnancies and were admitted to prenatal clinics at a state hospital. t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and hierarchical linear multiple regression were performed using IBM SPSS software version 23.0.
Results
This study indicated that high-risk pregnant women exhibited moderate levels of sense of coherence (54.43 ± 7.49), high acceptance of pregnancy (24.53 ± 5.83), and low levels of prenatal distress (11.63 ± 4.96). The research findings showed that acceptance of pregnancy was influenced by the wanted pregnancy status (β = 0.231, p = 0.002), prenatal distress (β = 0.275, p = 0.000), and sense of coherence levels of women (β = −0.206, p = 0.001). The explanatory power of the model was 34% (F = 5.250, p = 0.000).
Conclusions
The research revealed a strong link between the acceptance of pregnancy and factors such as the desired status of the pregnancy, prenatal stress, and a sense of coherence. These findings highlight key psychosocial predictors of pregnancy acceptance in high-risk pregnancies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.