Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera, Emmanuel Gómez-Romero, Adán Cabal-Prieto, José Andrés Herrera-Corredor, Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo, Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera, Ana Laura Piña-Martínez, José de Jesús González Reséndiz, Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez, Humberto Marín-Vega, Adriano Gomes da Cruz, José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos
{"title":"多标准技术(AHP和TOPSIS)用于减少咖啡消费者的情感和记忆词汇的远程和感官实验室研究","authors":"Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera, Emmanuel Gómez-Romero, Adán Cabal-Prieto, José Andrés Herrera-Corredor, Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo, Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera, Ana Laura Piña-Martínez, José de Jesús González Reséndiz, Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez, Humberto Marín-Vega, Adriano Gomes da Cruz, José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria Techniques (AHP and TOPSIS) for Reducing Emotion and Memory Vocabularies in Coffee Consumer for Remote and Sensory Laboratory Studies\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera, Emmanuel Gómez-Romero, Adán Cabal-Prieto, José Andrés Herrera-Corredor, Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo, Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera, Ana Laura Piña-Martínez, José de Jesús González Reséndiz, Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez, Humberto Marín-Vega, Adriano Gomes da Cruz, José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70486\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicriteria Techniques (AHP and TOPSIS) for Reducing Emotion and Memory Vocabularies in Coffee Consumer for Remote and Sensory Laboratory Studies
The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.