多标准技术(AHP和TOPSIS)用于减少咖啡消费者的情感和记忆词汇的远程和感官实验室研究

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera, Emmanuel Gómez-Romero, Adán Cabal-Prieto, José Andrés Herrera-Corredor, Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo, Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera, Ana Laura Piña-Martínez, José de Jesús González Reséndiz, Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez, Humberto Marín-Vega, Adriano Gomes da Cruz, José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos
{"title":"多标准技术(AHP和TOPSIS)用于减少咖啡消费者的情感和记忆词汇的远程和感官实验室研究","authors":"Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gómez-Romero,&nbsp;Adán Cabal-Prieto,&nbsp;José Andrés Herrera-Corredor,&nbsp;Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo,&nbsp;Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera,&nbsp;Ana Laura Piña-Martínez,&nbsp;José de Jesús González Reséndiz,&nbsp;Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez,&nbsp;Humberto Marín-Vega,&nbsp;Adriano Gomes da Cruz,&nbsp;José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria Techniques (AHP and TOPSIS) for Reducing Emotion and Memory Vocabularies in Coffee Consumer for Remote and Sensory Laboratory Studies\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gómez-Romero,&nbsp;Adán Cabal-Prieto,&nbsp;José Andrés Herrera-Corredor,&nbsp;Julio Enrique Oney-Montalvo,&nbsp;Luis Alfonso Can-Herrera,&nbsp;Ana Laura Piña-Martínez,&nbsp;José de Jesús González Reséndiz,&nbsp;Jasiel Valdivia-Sánchez,&nbsp;Humberto Marín-Vega,&nbsp;Adriano Gomes da Cruz,&nbsp;José Manuel Juárez-Barrientos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70486\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是应用mct、层次分析法(AHP)和理想溶液相似性排序偏好技术(TOPSIS)来减少EsSense25和MemVOC词汇量,并在远程和感官实验室环境下与咖啡消费者一起评估它们。在第一阶段,咖啡专家评估这两个词汇表,生成简化列表。在第二阶段,使用消费者试验组分析完整和简化列表的响应时间。最后,在第三阶段,使用check-all- thatapply (CATA)技术将完整和简化的清单应用于远程和实验室环境下的咖啡消费者,并通过多因素分析(MFA)评估它们的相关性。结果表明,采用层次分析法,EsSense25和MemVOC表被缩减为10种情绪和11种记忆,而TOPSIS表被缩减为16种情绪和15种记忆。上下文和列表之间的响应时间存在显著差异。在远程环境下,完整列表的评价需要340 s,而TOPSIS和AHP的简化列表分别需要244 s和160 s。在感官实验室中,完整列表的响应时间为485.8 s,而简化列表的TOPSIS和AHP分别需要236.3 s和131.4 s。在远程环境中,完整列表和简化列表之间的相关性从0.63到0.76不等,在感官实验室中从0.81到0.87不等。结论是,mct是一种有效的替代方法,可以减少基于专家意见的大量情绪和记忆列表,促进消费者快速有效的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicriteria Techniques (AHP and TOPSIS) for Reducing Emotion and Memory Vocabularies in Coffee Consumer for Remote and Sensory Laboratory Studies

The aim of this research was to apply MCTs, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to reduce the EsSense25 and MemVOC vocabularies and evaluate them with coffee consumers in remote and sensory laboratory contexts. In the first stage, coffee experts evaluated both vocabularies to generate reduced lists. In the second stage, the response time for complete and reduced lists was analyzed using a pilot group of consumers. Finally, in the third stage, the complete and reduced lists were applied to coffee consumers in remote and laboratory contexts using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) technique, and their correlation was evaluated through Multiple factor analysis (MFA). The results showed that with AHP, the EsSense25 and MemVOC lists were reduced to 10 emotions and 11 memories, while TOPSIS yielded 16 emotions and 15 memories. Significant differences were found in response times between contexts and lists. In the remote context, the evaluation of the complete list took 340 s, while the reduced lists by TOPSIS and AHP required 244 and 160 s, respectively. In the sensory laboratory, the response time for the complete list was 485.8 s, while the reduced lists required 236.3 s for TOPSIS and 131.4 s for AHP, respectively. The correlation between complete and reduced lists ranged from 0.63 to 0.76 in the remote context and from 0.81 to 0.87 in the sensory laboratory. It is concluded that MCTs are an efficient alternative to reduce extensive lists of emotions and memories based on expert opinions, facilitating rapid and effective evaluations with consumers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信