{"title":"髋关节保留手术后患者报告结果的轨迹:一项国家登记研究。","authors":"Junya Yoshitani, Seper Ekhtiari, Ajay Malviya, Vikas Khanduja","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding the trajectory of postoperative patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery is essential. This study aims to analyse patient-reported outcome trajectories up to 2 years post-surgery using the UK's national hip preservation registry and to examine the influence of potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy with preoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) scores and at least two follow-up measurements at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years were included from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. iHOT-12 score trajectories were analysed, and Latent Growth Curve Modelling was used to identify predictors of these trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall 9845 patients were included in this study. 7081 patients underwent a hip arthroscopy, and 1327 patients underwent a periacetabular osteotomy. For hip arthroscopy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year. However, there was a decrease in the minimal clinically important difference from 1 to 2 year. For periacetabular osteotomy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year, and from 1 to 2 years. Latent Growth Curve Modelling showed that body mass index (BMI) and sex had a significant impact on pre-operative iHOT-12 scores, while age and sex significantly influenced the recovery slope.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent hip preservation surgery exhibited significant improvement in iHOT-12 scores, surpassing the minimal clinically important difference at 6 months postoperatively. This improvement plateaued by 2 years, with a slight decline in scores between 1 and 2 years following hip arthroscopy, though the decrease remained within the clinically meaningful range. BMI, age and sex influenced score trajectories, highlighting the importance of setting patient expectations pre-operatively.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The UK's Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry https://www.nahr.co.uk/.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery: A National Registry Study.\",\"authors\":\"Junya Yoshitani, Seper Ekhtiari, Ajay Malviya, Vikas Khanduja\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding the trajectory of postoperative patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery is essential. This study aims to analyse patient-reported outcome trajectories up to 2 years post-surgery using the UK's national hip preservation registry and to examine the influence of potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy with preoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) scores and at least two follow-up measurements at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years were included from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. iHOT-12 score trajectories were analysed, and Latent Growth Curve Modelling was used to identify predictors of these trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall 9845 patients were included in this study. 7081 patients underwent a hip arthroscopy, and 1327 patients underwent a periacetabular osteotomy. For hip arthroscopy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year. However, there was a decrease in the minimal clinically important difference from 1 to 2 year. For periacetabular osteotomy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year, and from 1 to 2 years. Latent Growth Curve Modelling showed that body mass index (BMI) and sex had a significant impact on pre-operative iHOT-12 scores, while age and sex significantly influenced the recovery slope.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent hip preservation surgery exhibited significant improvement in iHOT-12 scores, surpassing the minimal clinically important difference at 6 months postoperatively. This improvement plateaued by 2 years, with a slight decline in scores between 1 and 2 years following hip arthroscopy, though the decrease remained within the clinically meaningful range. BMI, age and sex influenced score trajectories, highlighting the importance of setting patient expectations pre-operatively.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The UK's Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry https://www.nahr.co.uk/.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery: A National Registry Study.
Purpose: Understanding the trajectory of postoperative patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery is essential. This study aims to analyse patient-reported outcome trajectories up to 2 years post-surgery using the UK's national hip preservation registry and to examine the influence of potential confounders.
Methods: Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy with preoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) scores and at least two follow-up measurements at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years were included from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry. iHOT-12 score trajectories were analysed, and Latent Growth Curve Modelling was used to identify predictors of these trajectories.
Results: Overall 9845 patients were included in this study. 7081 patients underwent a hip arthroscopy, and 1327 patients underwent a periacetabular osteotomy. For hip arthroscopy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year. However, there was a decrease in the minimal clinically important difference from 1 to 2 year. For periacetabular osteotomy, there were significant improvements in the iHOT-12 scores from baseline to 6 months, but no significant change from 6 months to 1 year, and from 1 to 2 years. Latent Growth Curve Modelling showed that body mass index (BMI) and sex had a significant impact on pre-operative iHOT-12 scores, while age and sex significantly influenced the recovery slope.
Conclusions: Patients who underwent hip preservation surgery exhibited significant improvement in iHOT-12 scores, surpassing the minimal clinically important difference at 6 months postoperatively. This improvement plateaued by 2 years, with a slight decline in scores between 1 and 2 years following hip arthroscopy, though the decrease remained within the clinically meaningful range. BMI, age and sex influenced score trajectories, highlighting the importance of setting patient expectations pre-operatively.
Trial registration: The UK's Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry https://www.nahr.co.uk/.