在新罕布什尔州出生队列研究中,使用神经网络来获得儿童早期神经发育概况。

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001757
Julia A Bauer, Susan A Korrick, John L Pearce, David C Bellinger, Megan E Romano, Margaret R Karagas
{"title":"在新罕布什尔州出生队列研究中,使用神经网络来获得儿童早期神经发育概况。","authors":"Julia A Bauer, Susan A Korrick, John L Pearce, David C Bellinger, Megan E Romano, Margaret R Karagas","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Child-centred approaches represent a conceptual framework that emphasises the holistic characterisation of individual developmental patterns across cognitive, behavioural and social domains. As a complementary analytic tool, self-organising maps (SOMs), an artificial neural network, offer flexible, data-driven clustering capabilities that are well-suited to modeling complex, multidimensional and longitudinal developmental data. Despite their potential, few studies have applied such methods to profile early neurodevelopment, especially in rural populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied SOM to longitudinal neurobehavioural data (n=235) from healthy participant children from 3 to 5 years of age in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study, a rural pregnancy cohort. Group profiles reflect measures of behaviour and social responsiveness, cognition and motor performance and were examined in relation to known predictors of maternal-child characteristics using multinomial logistic regression as a proof of concept.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort, most children had neurotypical neurobehavioural scores, and 51% were boys. Mothers predominantly had some college education (74%), were married (93%) and were 31 years of age on average with above-average IQs relative to US norms. We identified six distinct neurobehavioural profiles (18-57 children each). The six profiles included: highest overall scores (profile 5), worst overall scores (profile 4), greatest behavioural/social improvement (profile 1), slight improvement (profile 3), average scores (profile 2) and highest adaptability (profile 6) relative to the full sample. Regression models showed expected associations with child sex, maternal IQ and parent-child relationships (eg, higher maternal IQ correlated with better cognitive outcomes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a SOM, we identified distinct neurobehavioural profiles among rural children, reflecting variation across behaviour, social responsiveness, cognition and motor skills. These profiles varied by maternal and child characteristics and highlight the potential of neural network approaches to inform early risk or resilience identification in understudied populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a neural network to derive early childhood neurodevelopmental profiles in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Julia A Bauer, Susan A Korrick, John L Pearce, David C Bellinger, Megan E Romano, Margaret R Karagas\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Child-centred approaches represent a conceptual framework that emphasises the holistic characterisation of individual developmental patterns across cognitive, behavioural and social domains. As a complementary analytic tool, self-organising maps (SOMs), an artificial neural network, offer flexible, data-driven clustering capabilities that are well-suited to modeling complex, multidimensional and longitudinal developmental data. Despite their potential, few studies have applied such methods to profile early neurodevelopment, especially in rural populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied SOM to longitudinal neurobehavioural data (n=235) from healthy participant children from 3 to 5 years of age in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study, a rural pregnancy cohort. Group profiles reflect measures of behaviour and social responsiveness, cognition and motor performance and were examined in relation to known predictors of maternal-child characteristics using multinomial logistic regression as a proof of concept.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort, most children had neurotypical neurobehavioural scores, and 51% were boys. Mothers predominantly had some college education (74%), were married (93%) and were 31 years of age on average with above-average IQs relative to US norms. We identified six distinct neurobehavioural profiles (18-57 children each). The six profiles included: highest overall scores (profile 5), worst overall scores (profile 4), greatest behavioural/social improvement (profile 1), slight improvement (profile 3), average scores (profile 2) and highest adaptability (profile 6) relative to the full sample. Regression models showed expected associations with child sex, maternal IQ and parent-child relationships (eg, higher maternal IQ correlated with better cognitive outcomes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a SOM, we identified distinct neurobehavioural profiles among rural children, reflecting variation across behaviour, social responsiveness, cognition and motor skills. These profiles varied by maternal and child characteristics and highlight the potential of neural network approaches to inform early risk or resilience identification in understudied populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e001757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以儿童为中心的方法代表了一个概念框架,强调在认知、行为和社会领域的个人发展模式的整体特征。作为一种补充分析工具,自组织地图(SOMs)是一种人工神经网络,提供灵活的、数据驱动的聚类能力,非常适合对复杂的、多维的和纵向的发展数据进行建模。尽管这些方法很有潜力,但很少有研究应用这些方法来描述早期神经发育,特别是在农村人口中。方法:我们将SOM应用于新罕布什尔州出生队列研究(农村妊娠队列)中3 - 5岁健康儿童的纵向神经行为数据(n=235)。群体概况反映了行为和社会反应、认知和运动表现的措施,并使用多项逻辑回归作为概念证明,与已知的母婴特征预测因素进行了检查。结果:在我们的队列中,大多数儿童具有典型的神经行为评分,51%为男孩。这些母亲大多受过大学教育(74%),已婚(93%),平均年龄31岁,智商高于美国平均水平。我们确定了六种不同的神经行为特征(每种18-57名儿童)。这六个特征包括:相对于整个样本而言,最高总分(特征5)、最差总分(特征4)、最大行为/社会进步(特征1)、轻微进步(特征3)、平均得分(特征2)和最高适应性(特征6)。回归模型显示了与儿童性别、母亲智商和亲子关系的预期关联(例如,母亲智商越高,认知结果越好)。结论:使用SOM,我们在农村儿童中发现了不同的神经行为特征,反映了行为、社会反应、认知和运动技能的差异。这些概况因母亲和儿童的特征而异,并突出了神经网络方法在未充分研究人群中为早期风险或恢复力识别提供信息的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a neural network to derive early childhood neurodevelopmental profiles in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Background: Child-centred approaches represent a conceptual framework that emphasises the holistic characterisation of individual developmental patterns across cognitive, behavioural and social domains. As a complementary analytic tool, self-organising maps (SOMs), an artificial neural network, offer flexible, data-driven clustering capabilities that are well-suited to modeling complex, multidimensional and longitudinal developmental data. Despite their potential, few studies have applied such methods to profile early neurodevelopment, especially in rural populations.

Methods: We applied SOM to longitudinal neurobehavioural data (n=235) from healthy participant children from 3 to 5 years of age in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study, a rural pregnancy cohort. Group profiles reflect measures of behaviour and social responsiveness, cognition and motor performance and were examined in relation to known predictors of maternal-child characteristics using multinomial logistic regression as a proof of concept.

Results: In our cohort, most children had neurotypical neurobehavioural scores, and 51% were boys. Mothers predominantly had some college education (74%), were married (93%) and were 31 years of age on average with above-average IQs relative to US norms. We identified six distinct neurobehavioural profiles (18-57 children each). The six profiles included: highest overall scores (profile 5), worst overall scores (profile 4), greatest behavioural/social improvement (profile 1), slight improvement (profile 3), average scores (profile 2) and highest adaptability (profile 6) relative to the full sample. Regression models showed expected associations with child sex, maternal IQ and parent-child relationships (eg, higher maternal IQ correlated with better cognitive outcomes).

Conclusions: Using a SOM, we identified distinct neurobehavioural profiles among rural children, reflecting variation across behaviour, social responsiveness, cognition and motor skills. These profiles varied by maternal and child characteristics and highlight the potential of neural network approaches to inform early risk or resilience identification in understudied populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信