Jiahao Xiangli, Binquan Ma, Yu Liang, Shi Haijiangshi, Xifang Liu
{"title":"单独的功能性电刺激和辅助运动对改善脊髓损伤患者呼吸功能和有氧能力的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiahao Xiangli, Binquan Ma, Yu Liang, Shi Haijiangshi, Xifang Liu","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1623752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES), used either alone or as an adjunct to exercise (rowing/cycling), for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through January 2025. We included 23 randomized controlled trials and self-controlled studies (<i>N</i> = 314) that assessed outcomes such as forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory/inspiratory pressure (MEP/MIP), and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When used as a standalone intervention, FES significantly improved expiratory function, with notable increases in PEF (SMD = 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.007), MEP (SMD=0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and FVC (SMD = 0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.03). However, no significant improvement was found for MIP (<i>p</i> = 0.38). When FES was combined with exercise, it significantly enhanced aerobic capacity. This was demonstrated by improvements in VO₂peak for both FES-assisted rowing (SMD = 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and FES-assisted cycling (SMD = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) compared to exercise alone. No significant effects on peak ventilation were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FES moderately improves key expiratory functions in individuals with SCI and acts synergistically with exercise to augment aerobic capacity. These findings support the clinical use of FES in this population. However, the interpretation of these results should consider the methodological heterogeneity across studies and the limited sample size for some outcomes.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero, identifier CRD420251030235.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1623752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation alone and as an adjunct to exercise for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Xiangli, Binquan Ma, Yu Liang, Shi Haijiangshi, Xifang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2025.1623752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES), used either alone or as an adjunct to exercise (rowing/cycling), for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through January 2025. We included 23 randomized controlled trials and self-controlled studies (<i>N</i> = 314) that assessed outcomes such as forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory/inspiratory pressure (MEP/MIP), and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When used as a standalone intervention, FES significantly improved expiratory function, with notable increases in PEF (SMD = 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.007), MEP (SMD=0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and FVC (SMD = 0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.03). However, no significant improvement was found for MIP (<i>p</i> = 0.38). When FES was combined with exercise, it significantly enhanced aerobic capacity. This was demonstrated by improvements in VO₂peak for both FES-assisted rowing (SMD = 0.35, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and FES-assisted cycling (SMD = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) compared to exercise alone. No significant effects on peak ventilation were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FES moderately improves key expiratory functions in individuals with SCI and acts synergistically with exercise to augment aerobic capacity. These findings support the clinical use of FES in this population. However, the interpretation of these results should consider the methodological heterogeneity across studies and the limited sample size for some outcomes.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero, identifier CRD420251030235.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1623752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1623752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1623752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:系统评价功能性电刺激(FES)单独或辅助运动(划船/骑自行车)对改善脊髓损伤(SCI)患者呼吸功能和有氧能力的疗效。方法:我们进行了一项符合prisma标准的元分析,检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science至2025年1月。我们纳入了23项随机对照试验和自我对照研究(N = 314),评估了用力肺活量(FVC)、呼气峰值流量(PEF)、最大呼气/吸气压力(MEP/MIP)和峰值摄氧量(vo2峰值)等结果。结果:单独干预时,FES可显著改善呼气功能,PEF (SMD= 0.42, p = 0.007)、MEP (SMD=0.93, p = 0.008)、FVC (SMD= 0.37, p = 0.03)均显著升高。然而,MIP没有明显改善(p = 0.38)。当FES与运动相结合时,它显著提高了有氧能力。与单独运动相比,fes辅助划船(SMD = 0.35, p = 0.03)和fes辅助骑自行车(SMD = 0.24, p = 0.0003)的VO 2峰值均有所改善。未观察到对峰值通风量的显著影响。结论:FES适度改善脊髓损伤患者的关键呼气功能,并与运动协同作用以增强有氧能力。这些发现支持FES在这一人群中的临床应用。然而,对这些结果的解释应考虑研究方法的异质性和某些结果的有限样本量。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero,标识符CRD420251030235。
Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation alone and as an adjunct to exercise for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES), used either alone or as an adjunct to exercise (rowing/cycling), for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through January 2025. We included 23 randomized controlled trials and self-controlled studies (N = 314) that assessed outcomes such as forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory/inspiratory pressure (MEP/MIP), and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak).
Results: When used as a standalone intervention, FES significantly improved expiratory function, with notable increases in PEF (SMD = 0.42, p = 0.007), MEP (SMD=0.93, p = 0.008), and FVC (SMD = 0.37, p = 0.03). However, no significant improvement was found for MIP (p = 0.38). When FES was combined with exercise, it significantly enhanced aerobic capacity. This was demonstrated by improvements in VO₂peak for both FES-assisted rowing (SMD = 0.35, p = 0.03) and FES-assisted cycling (SMD = 0.24, p = 0.0003) compared to exercise alone. No significant effects on peak ventilation were observed.
Conclusion: FES moderately improves key expiratory functions in individuals with SCI and acts synergistically with exercise to augment aerobic capacity. These findings support the clinical use of FES in this population. However, the interpretation of these results should consider the methodological heterogeneity across studies and the limited sample size for some outcomes.