Liza M Kurucz, Tiziano Natali, Sanne Westerhout, Marias Hagens, Jeroen J Visser, Erik A M van Muilekom, Jolien D van Kesteren, Ivo Schoots, Thierry N Boellaard, Georgios Agrotis, Behdad Dashtbozorg, Theo J M Ruers, Pim J van Leeuwen, Laura S Mertens
{"title":"经腹超声评估前列腺体积和psa -密度:前列腺癌早期诊断与MRI和经直肠超声比较准确性的前瞻性证据。","authors":"Liza M Kurucz, Tiziano Natali, Sanne Westerhout, Marias Hagens, Jeroen J Visser, Erik A M van Muilekom, Jolien D van Kesteren, Ivo Schoots, Thierry N Boellaard, Georgios Agrotis, Behdad Dashtbozorg, Theo J M Ruers, Pim J van Leeuwen, Laura S Mertens","doi":"10.1002/pros.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density is an easily available predictor for clinically significant PCa. While transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is utilized for PSA density (PSAD) estimation, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is a more accessible, noninvasive alternative that can be used to decide if follow-up diagnostics are necessary. This study aims to compare prostate volume (PV) and PSAD across TAUS, TRUS and MRI, comparing the clinical utility of TAUS and TRUS for PSAD-based risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hundred and eighty men undergoing PCa diagnostics were included by collecting serum PSA, TRUS, MRI, and TAUS PV examinations. PV was calculated blindly by all operators and image quality was assessed. Agreement in PV measurements of all imaging modalities was analyzed in Bland-Altman diagrams. PCa risk derived from PSAD<sub>TAUS</sub> and PSAD<sub>TRUS</sub> was compared against MRI outcomes in Sankey diagrams and the percentage of misclassified PCa risk was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After excluding 33 inadequate TAUS acquisitions, 147 patients were included. The average volume difference between TAUS and MRI was 2.5 mL (standard deviation (SD): 16.4), between TAUS and TRUS 11.5 mL (SD: 20.4), and between TRUS and MRI -9.0 mL (SD: 21.1). TAUS and TRUS underestimate PCa risk in 3%-4%, while the percentage of men with overestimated risk decreased when TAUS was used (7% vs. 13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVs obtained with TAUS are equivalent to MRI. Still, image quality varies with experience and interobserver variability needs further exploration, ensuring generalizable outcomes. Nevertheless, TAUS represents a valid alternative for PV and PSAD estimation, enabling a patient-friendly alternative for PCa risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Volume and PSA-Density Estimation by Transabdominal Ultrasound: Prospective Evidence of Comparative Accuracy to MRI and Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Early Diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Liza M Kurucz, Tiziano Natali, Sanne Westerhout, Marias Hagens, Jeroen J Visser, Erik A M van Muilekom, Jolien D van Kesteren, Ivo Schoots, Thierry N Boellaard, Georgios Agrotis, Behdad Dashtbozorg, Theo J M Ruers, Pim J van Leeuwen, Laura S Mertens\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density is an easily available predictor for clinically significant PCa. While transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is utilized for PSA density (PSAD) estimation, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is a more accessible, noninvasive alternative that can be used to decide if follow-up diagnostics are necessary. This study aims to compare prostate volume (PV) and PSAD across TAUS, TRUS and MRI, comparing the clinical utility of TAUS and TRUS for PSAD-based risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hundred and eighty men undergoing PCa diagnostics were included by collecting serum PSA, TRUS, MRI, and TAUS PV examinations. PV was calculated blindly by all operators and image quality was assessed. Agreement in PV measurements of all imaging modalities was analyzed in Bland-Altman diagrams. PCa risk derived from PSAD<sub>TAUS</sub> and PSAD<sub>TRUS</sub> was compared against MRI outcomes in Sankey diagrams and the percentage of misclassified PCa risk was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After excluding 33 inadequate TAUS acquisitions, 147 patients were included. The average volume difference between TAUS and MRI was 2.5 mL (standard deviation (SD): 16.4), between TAUS and TRUS 11.5 mL (SD: 20.4), and between TRUS and MRI -9.0 mL (SD: 21.1). TAUS and TRUS underestimate PCa risk in 3%-4%, while the percentage of men with overestimated risk decreased when TAUS was used (7% vs. 13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVs obtained with TAUS are equivalent to MRI. Still, image quality varies with experience and interobserver variability needs further exploration, ensuring generalizable outcomes. Nevertheless, TAUS represents a valid alternative for PV and PSAD estimation, enabling a patient-friendly alternative for PCa risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度是临床显著性前列腺癌的一个容易获得的预测指标。虽然经直肠超声(TRUS)用于PSA密度(PSAD)的估计,但经腹部超声(TAUS)是一种更容易获得、无创的替代方法,可用于决定是否需要随访诊断。本研究旨在通过TAUS、TRUS和MRI比较前列腺体积(PV)和PSAD,比较TAUS和TRUS在基于PSAD的风险分层中的临床应用。方法:通过收集血清PSA、TRUS、MRI和TAUS PV检查,对180名接受前列腺癌诊断的男性进行分析。所有操作人员盲目计算PV并评估图像质量。在Bland-Altman图中分析了所有成像方式的PV测量结果的一致性。将PSADTAUS和PSADTRUS衍生的PCa风险与Sankey图中的MRI结果进行比较,并报告了错误分类PCa风险的百分比。结果:排除33例TAUS获取不充分的患者后,纳入147例患者。TAUS与MRI的平均容积差为2.5 mL(标准差(SD): 16.4), TAUS与TRUS的平均容积差为11.5 mL (SD: 20.4), TRUS与MRI的平均容积差为-9.0 mL (SD: 21.1)。TAUS和TRUS低估PCa风险的比例为3%-4%,而使用TAUS时,高估风险的男性比例下降(7%对13%)。结论:TAUS获得的pv与MRI相当。尽管如此,图像质量随经验而变化,观察者之间的可变性需要进一步探索,以确保可推广的结果。然而,TAUS代表了PV和PSAD评估的有效替代方案,为PCa风险评估提供了对患者友好的替代方案。
Prostate Volume and PSA-Density Estimation by Transabdominal Ultrasound: Prospective Evidence of Comparative Accuracy to MRI and Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Early Diagnostics.
Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density is an easily available predictor for clinically significant PCa. While transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is utilized for PSA density (PSAD) estimation, transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is a more accessible, noninvasive alternative that can be used to decide if follow-up diagnostics are necessary. This study aims to compare prostate volume (PV) and PSAD across TAUS, TRUS and MRI, comparing the clinical utility of TAUS and TRUS for PSAD-based risk stratification.
Methods: Hundred and eighty men undergoing PCa diagnostics were included by collecting serum PSA, TRUS, MRI, and TAUS PV examinations. PV was calculated blindly by all operators and image quality was assessed. Agreement in PV measurements of all imaging modalities was analyzed in Bland-Altman diagrams. PCa risk derived from PSADTAUS and PSADTRUS was compared against MRI outcomes in Sankey diagrams and the percentage of misclassified PCa risk was reported.
Results: After excluding 33 inadequate TAUS acquisitions, 147 patients were included. The average volume difference between TAUS and MRI was 2.5 mL (standard deviation (SD): 16.4), between TAUS and TRUS 11.5 mL (SD: 20.4), and between TRUS and MRI -9.0 mL (SD: 21.1). TAUS and TRUS underestimate PCa risk in 3%-4%, while the percentage of men with overestimated risk decreased when TAUS was used (7% vs. 13%).
Conclusions: PVs obtained with TAUS are equivalent to MRI. Still, image quality varies with experience and interobserver variability needs further exploration, ensuring generalizable outcomes. Nevertheless, TAUS represents a valid alternative for PV and PSAD estimation, enabling a patient-friendly alternative for PCa risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.