Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong
{"title":"反思COVID-19行动内审查:将突发公共卫生事件中的集体内省制度化。","authors":"Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2025.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"19 ","pages":"e242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting on COVID-19 Intra-action Reviews: Institutionalizing Collective Introspection During Public Health Emergencies.\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dmp.2025.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"e242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reflecting on COVID-19 Intra-action Reviews: Institutionalizing Collective Introspection During Public Health Emergencies.
The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.
期刊介绍:
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.