反思COVID-19行动内审查:将突发公共卫生事件中的集体内省制度化。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong
{"title":"反思COVID-19行动内审查:将突发公共卫生事件中的集体内省制度化。","authors":"Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2025.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"19 ","pages":"e242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting on COVID-19 Intra-action Reviews: Institutionalizing Collective Introspection During Public Health Emergencies.\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Chiu de Vazquez, Landry Ndriko Mayigane, Armand Mbanya, Candice Vente, Elliot Brennan, Rolland Kimbi Wango, Mary Stephen, Ambrose Otau Talisuna, Jussi Sane, Tanja Schmidt, Nicolas Isla, Ihor Perehinets, Dalia Samhouri, Maung Maung Htike, Reuben Samuel, Phuong Nam Nguyen, Babatunde Olowokure, Tamara Mancero, Liviu Vedrasco, Stella Chungong\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dmp.2025.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"e242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行的规模和持续时间突出表明,各国需要不断反思和改进其目前的应对措施。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2020年7月推出了《2019冠状病毒病行动内审查指南》。截至2022年11月25日,世卫组织所有6个区域的78个国家已开展了136次iar。IARs由国家主导,成果由国家拥有,其灵活的方法使各国能够在国家和次国家层面专注于与covid -19相关的优先问题。世卫组织促进使用IARs的方法认识到三种学习方式的重要性:国家通过自我反思学习,国家相互学习,以及世卫组织和合作伙伴向各国学习,以改进世卫组织的指导和工具。展望未来,通过将持续学习的心态制度化,并将基于反思性学习的建议转化为政策变革和行动,可以进一步提高突发公共卫生事件中反思性学习的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflecting on COVID-19 Intra-action Reviews: Institutionalizing Collective Introspection During Public Health Emergencies.

The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for countries to continuously reflect and improve on their ongoing response. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the guidance for conducting COVID-19 intra-action reviews (IARs) in July 2020. As of November 25, 2022, 136 IARs have been conducted by 78 countries in all 6 WHO regions. IARs are country-led and outcomes country-owned, with the flexible methodology enabling countries to focus on COVID-19-related priority issues in their national and subnational contexts. WHO's approach to promoting the use of IARs recognizes the importance of 3 learning modalities: countries learning through self-reflection, countries learning from each other, and WHO and partners learning from countries to improve WHO guidance and tools. Moving forward, the value of reflective learning in public health emergencies can be further enhanced by institutionalizing an ongoing learning mindset and translating reflective learning-based recommendations into policy change and action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信