腹会阴拉通延迟结肠肛管吻合术治疗盆腔吻合失败的系统综述。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
T J K Tan, S-M Ng, T S Q Lee, E K-W Tan, I Seow-En
{"title":"腹会阴拉通延迟结肠肛管吻合术治疗盆腔吻合失败的系统综述。","authors":"T J K Tan, S-M Ng, T S Q Lee, E K-W Tan, I Seow-En","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03206-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite the potential benefits of abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA), it is still infrequently performed as a salvage procedure for pelvic anastomotic failure. We aimed to perform a systematic review on the subject to guide practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were used to identify studies evaluating DCAA for salvage after pelvic surgery from inception to August 2024. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was overall stoma-free survival. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, high-grade postoperative complication rates, 30-day postoperative mortality rates, incidence of redo surgical intervention after DCAA, and postoperative anorectal function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five retrospective cohort studies evaluating a total of 97 patients who underwent salvage abdominoperineal pull-through and DCAA were included in this review. All patients had previous pelvic surgery, predominantly proctectomy (n = 84, 86.6%). The most common indication for redo surgery was chronic fistula (n = 62, 63.9%) followed by anastomotic leak or chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 34, 35.1%). The pooled overall stoma-free survival rate across all five studies was 81.4% over a mean 24-month postoperative follow-up duration. The overall incidence of high-grade complications after DCAA was 39.1% (n = 38). Pooled mean length of stay was 17 days. There were no cases of early postoperative death. Pooled rate of repeat surgery across four studies was 11.6% (n = 8). Pooled mean functional scores across three studies indicated minor low anterior resection syndrome at 26 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis is a viable option for salvage surgery following pelvic anastomotic complications, with low rates of permanent stoma and acceptable long-term anorectal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure-a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"T J K Tan, S-M Ng, T S Q Lee, E K-W Tan, I Seow-En\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03206-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite the potential benefits of abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA), it is still infrequently performed as a salvage procedure for pelvic anastomotic failure. We aimed to perform a systematic review on the subject to guide practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were used to identify studies evaluating DCAA for salvage after pelvic surgery from inception to August 2024. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was overall stoma-free survival. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, high-grade postoperative complication rates, 30-day postoperative mortality rates, incidence of redo surgical intervention after DCAA, and postoperative anorectal function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five retrospective cohort studies evaluating a total of 97 patients who underwent salvage abdominoperineal pull-through and DCAA were included in this review. All patients had previous pelvic surgery, predominantly proctectomy (n = 84, 86.6%). The most common indication for redo surgery was chronic fistula (n = 62, 63.9%) followed by anastomotic leak or chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 34, 35.1%). The pooled overall stoma-free survival rate across all five studies was 81.4% over a mean 24-month postoperative follow-up duration. The overall incidence of high-grade complications after DCAA was 39.1% (n = 38). Pooled mean length of stay was 17 days. There were no cases of early postoperative death. Pooled rate of repeat surgery across four studies was 11.6% (n = 8). Pooled mean functional scores across three studies indicated minor low anterior resection syndrome at 26 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis is a viable option for salvage surgery following pelvic anastomotic complications, with low rates of permanent stoma and acceptable long-term anorectal function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03206-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03206-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管腹-会阴拉通延迟结肠肛管吻合术(DCAA)有潜在的好处,但它仍然很少作为盆腔吻合失败的抢救手术。我们的目标是对这个主题进行系统的回顾,以指导实践。方法:通过PubMed、Embase和Cochrane检索自成立以来至2024年8月评估DCAA对盆腔术后抢救作用的研究。偏倚风险评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。主要终点是总体无造口生存。次要结局包括住院时间、术后高度并发症发生率、术后30天死亡率、DCAA后再次手术干预发生率和术后肛肠功能。结果:本综述纳入了5项回顾性队列研究,共评估了97例接受挽救性腹会阴拉通和DCAA的患者。所有患者均有盆腔手术史,以直肠切除术为主(n = 84, 86.6%)。重做手术最常见的指征是慢性瘘(n = 62, 63.9%),其次是吻合口漏或慢性盆腔脓毒症(n = 34, 35.1%)。在平均24个月的术后随访时间内,所有5项研究的总无气孔生存率为81.4%。DCAA术后高级别并发症总发生率为39.1% (n = 38)。合并平均住院时间为17天。无术后早期死亡病例。四项研究的重复手术合并率为11.6% (n = 8)。三项研究的综合平均功能评分显示,在26个月时出现轻微的前低位切除综合征。结论:腹会阴拉通延迟结肠肛管吻合术是盆腔吻合并发症后挽救手术的可行选择,永久造口率低,长期肛肠功能可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure-a systematic review.

Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis for pelvic anastomotic failure-a systematic review.

Aim: Despite the potential benefits of abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA), it is still infrequently performed as a salvage procedure for pelvic anastomotic failure. We aimed to perform a systematic review on the subject to guide practice.

Method: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were used to identify studies evaluating DCAA for salvage after pelvic surgery from inception to August 2024. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was overall stoma-free survival. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, high-grade postoperative complication rates, 30-day postoperative mortality rates, incidence of redo surgical intervention after DCAA, and postoperative anorectal function.

Results: Five retrospective cohort studies evaluating a total of 97 patients who underwent salvage abdominoperineal pull-through and DCAA were included in this review. All patients had previous pelvic surgery, predominantly proctectomy (n = 84, 86.6%). The most common indication for redo surgery was chronic fistula (n = 62, 63.9%) followed by anastomotic leak or chronic pelvic sepsis (n = 34, 35.1%). The pooled overall stoma-free survival rate across all five studies was 81.4% over a mean 24-month postoperative follow-up duration. The overall incidence of high-grade complications after DCAA was 39.1% (n = 38). Pooled mean length of stay was 17 days. There were no cases of early postoperative death. Pooled rate of repeat surgery across four studies was 11.6% (n = 8). Pooled mean functional scores across three studies indicated minor low anterior resection syndrome at 26 months.

Conclusion: Abdominoperineal pull-through with delayed coloanal anastomosis is a viable option for salvage surgery following pelvic anastomotic complications, with low rates of permanent stoma and acceptable long-term anorectal function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信