{"title":"Kpop:在调查加权中减少规范假设的核平衡方法。","authors":"Erin Hartman, Chad Hazlett, Ciara Sterbenz","doi":"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the precipitous decline in response rates, researchers and pollsters have been left with highly nonrepresentative samples, relying on constructed weights to make these samples representative of the desired target population. Though practitioners employ valuable expert knowledge to choose what variables <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> must be adjusted for, they rarely defend particular functional forms relating these variables to the response process or the outcome. Unfortunately, commonly used calibration weights-which make the weighted mean of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> in the sample equal that of the population-only ensure correct adjustment when the portion of the outcome and the response process left unexplained by linear functions of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> are independent. To alleviate this functional form dependency, we describe kernel balancing for population weighting (<i>kpop</i>). This approach replaces the design matrix <math><mrow><mtext>X</mtext></mrow> </math> with a kernel matrix, <math><mrow><mtext>K</mtext></mrow> </math> encoding high-order information about <math><mrow><mtext>X</mtext></mrow> </math> . Weights are then found to make the weighted average row of <math><mrow><mtext>K</mtext></mrow> </math> among sampled units approximately equal to that of the target population. This produces good calibration on a wide range of smooth functions of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> , without relying on the user to decide which <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> or what functions of them to include. We describe the method and illustrate it by application to polling data from the 2016 US presidential election.</p>","PeriodicalId":49983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","volume":"188 3","pages":"875-895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>kpop</i>: a kernel balancing approach for reducing specification assumptions in survey weighting.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Hartman, Chad Hazlett, Ciara Sterbenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the precipitous decline in response rates, researchers and pollsters have been left with highly nonrepresentative samples, relying on constructed weights to make these samples representative of the desired target population. Though practitioners employ valuable expert knowledge to choose what variables <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> must be adjusted for, they rarely defend particular functional forms relating these variables to the response process or the outcome. Unfortunately, commonly used calibration weights-which make the weighted mean of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> in the sample equal that of the population-only ensure correct adjustment when the portion of the outcome and the response process left unexplained by linear functions of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> are independent. To alleviate this functional form dependency, we describe kernel balancing for population weighting (<i>kpop</i>). This approach replaces the design matrix <math><mrow><mtext>X</mtext></mrow> </math> with a kernel matrix, <math><mrow><mtext>K</mtext></mrow> </math> encoding high-order information about <math><mrow><mtext>X</mtext></mrow> </math> . Weights are then found to make the weighted average row of <math><mrow><mtext>K</mtext></mrow> </math> among sampled units approximately equal to that of the target population. This produces good calibration on a wide range of smooth functions of <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> , without relying on the user to decide which <math><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow> </math> or what functions of them to include. We describe the method and illustrate it by application to polling data from the 2016 US presidential election.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"volume\":\"188 3\",\"pages\":\"875-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
kpop: a kernel balancing approach for reducing specification assumptions in survey weighting.
With the precipitous decline in response rates, researchers and pollsters have been left with highly nonrepresentative samples, relying on constructed weights to make these samples representative of the desired target population. Though practitioners employ valuable expert knowledge to choose what variables must be adjusted for, they rarely defend particular functional forms relating these variables to the response process or the outcome. Unfortunately, commonly used calibration weights-which make the weighted mean of in the sample equal that of the population-only ensure correct adjustment when the portion of the outcome and the response process left unexplained by linear functions of are independent. To alleviate this functional form dependency, we describe kernel balancing for population weighting (kpop). This approach replaces the design matrix with a kernel matrix, encoding high-order information about . Weights are then found to make the weighted average row of among sampled units approximately equal to that of the target population. This produces good calibration on a wide range of smooth functions of , without relying on the user to decide which or what functions of them to include. We describe the method and illustrate it by application to polling data from the 2016 US presidential election.
期刊介绍:
Series A (Statistics in Society) publishes high quality papers that demonstrate how statistical thinking, design and analyses play a vital role in all walks of life and benefit society in general. There is no restriction on subject-matter: any interesting, topical and revelatory applications of statistics are welcome. For example, important applications of statistical and related data science methodology in medicine, business and commerce, industry, economics and finance, education and teaching, physical and biomedical sciences, the environment, the law, government and politics, demography, psychology, sociology and sport all fall within the journal''s remit. The journal is therefore aimed at a wide statistical audience and at professional statisticians in particular. Its emphasis is on well-written and clearly reasoned quantitative approaches to problems in the real world rather than the exposition of technical detail. Thus, although the methodological basis of papers must be sound and adequately explained, methodology per se should not be the main focus of a Series A paper. Of particular interest are papers on topical or contentious statistical issues, papers which give reviews or exposés of current statistical concerns and papers which demonstrate how appropriate statistical thinking has contributed to our understanding of important substantive questions. Historical, professional and biographical contributions are also welcome, as are discussions of methods of data collection and of ethical issues, provided that all such papers have substantial statistical relevance.