正念无反应性、焦虑、抑郁和感知压力作为正念虚拟社区干预的中介——促进大学生心理健康的途径:两项随机对照试验的二次评价。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.2196/65853
Meysam Pirbaglou, Christo El Morr, Farah Ahmad, Paul Ritvo
{"title":"正念无反应性、焦虑、抑郁和感知压力作为正念虚拟社区干预的中介——促进大学生心理健康的途径:两项随机对照试验的二次评价。","authors":"Meysam Pirbaglou, Christo El Morr, Farah Ahmad, Paul Ritvo","doi":"10.2196/65853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in mental health promotion and treatment. Despite widespread evidence of effectiveness with different populations and delivery modes, there are sparse findings concerning the mechanisms of action in MBIs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was to understand the mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community (MVC) intervention, an 8-week, multicomponent, online mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy (M-CBT) intervention, based on a secondary evaluation of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with student participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mediation analysis, using structural equation modeling, was used to assess direct and indirect relationships between study group (ie, intervention or wait list control) and outcomes. Consistent with the intervention's theoretical perspective and direct effects paths, a model was specified to evaluate whether mindful nonreactivity, as evaluated by the 5-factor mindfulness questionnaire, mediated the effect of MVC intervention on anxiety and depression (as symptom-driven outcomes), and perceived stress and quality of life (as functional outcomes). The model included additional mediating paths for perceived stress through anxiety and depression, and for quality of life through anxiety, depression, and perceived stress. The model was thereafter extended, adjusting for pre-intervention differences in mindfulness (ie, observing, describing, activity with awareness, nonjudgment, and nonreactivity) facets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct (nonmediated) effects indicated statistically significant differences at 8 weeks between the MVC and waitlist control (WLC) groups on depression (-1.72; P=.002), anxiety (-3.40; P=.001), perceived stress (-2.44; P<.001), quality of life (4.31; P=.005), and the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness (1.63; P<.001), in favor of the MVC intervention. Mediation analysis supported the mediating role of the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress through single and sequential mediation paths. Results indicated good fit characteristics for the main (comparative fit index [CFI]=.99; root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]=.05; standardized root-mean-square residual [SRMR]=.05) and extended (CFI=.99; RMSEA=.04; SRMR=.04) models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the importance of mindful nonreactivity, depression, and anxiety as key mediators of MVC intervention benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e65853"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindful Nonreactivity, Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress as Mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community Intervention-Pathways to Enhance Mental Health in University Students: Secondary Evaluation of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Student Participants.\",\"authors\":\"Meysam Pirbaglou, Christo El Morr, Farah Ahmad, Paul Ritvo\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in mental health promotion and treatment. Despite widespread evidence of effectiveness with different populations and delivery modes, there are sparse findings concerning the mechanisms of action in MBIs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was to understand the mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community (MVC) intervention, an 8-week, multicomponent, online mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy (M-CBT) intervention, based on a secondary evaluation of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with student participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mediation analysis, using structural equation modeling, was used to assess direct and indirect relationships between study group (ie, intervention or wait list control) and outcomes. Consistent with the intervention's theoretical perspective and direct effects paths, a model was specified to evaluate whether mindful nonreactivity, as evaluated by the 5-factor mindfulness questionnaire, mediated the effect of MVC intervention on anxiety and depression (as symptom-driven outcomes), and perceived stress and quality of life (as functional outcomes). The model included additional mediating paths for perceived stress through anxiety and depression, and for quality of life through anxiety, depression, and perceived stress. The model was thereafter extended, adjusting for pre-intervention differences in mindfulness (ie, observing, describing, activity with awareness, nonjudgment, and nonreactivity) facets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct (nonmediated) effects indicated statistically significant differences at 8 weeks between the MVC and waitlist control (WLC) groups on depression (-1.72; P=.002), anxiety (-3.40; P=.001), perceived stress (-2.44; P<.001), quality of life (4.31; P=.005), and the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness (1.63; P<.001), in favor of the MVC intervention. Mediation analysis supported the mediating role of the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress through single and sequential mediation paths. Results indicated good fit characteristics for the main (comparative fit index [CFI]=.99; root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]=.05; standardized root-mean-square residual [SRMR]=.05) and extended (CFI=.99; RMSEA=.04; SRMR=.04) models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the importance of mindful nonreactivity, depression, and anxiety as key mediators of MVC intervention benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e65853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65853\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正念干预(MBIs)在心理健康促进和治疗中得到广泛应用。尽管广泛的证据表明在不同的人群和递送模式中有效,但关于mbi的作用机制的发现很少。目的:本文旨在通过对两项随机对照试验(rct)的二次评价,了解正念虚拟社区(MVC)干预的中介因素,这是一项为期8周的多组分在线正念和认知行为治疗(M-CBT)干预。方法:采用结构方程模型进行中介分析,评估实验组(即干预或等候名单对照)与结局的直接和间接关系。与干预的理论观点和直接效应路径一致,我们指定了一个模型来评估正念无反应性是否介导MVC干预对焦虑和抑郁(作为症状驱动的结果),以及感知压力和生活质量(作为功能结果)的影响。该模型包括通过焦虑和抑郁感知压力的额外中介路径,以及通过焦虑、抑郁和感知压力影响生活质量的额外中介路径。该模型随后被扩展,调整了正念(即观察、描述、有意识的活动、非判断和非反应)方面的干预前差异。结果:直接(非介导)效应显示,在8周时,MVC组和等候名单对照组(WLC)在抑郁(-1.72;P= 0.002)、焦虑(-3.40;P= 0.001)、感知压力(-2.44;P)方面存在统计学差异。结论:本研究强调了正心无反应性、抑郁和焦虑作为MVC干预益处的关键中介的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mindful Nonreactivity, Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress as Mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community Intervention-Pathways to Enhance Mental Health in University Students: Secondary Evaluation of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Student Participants.

Mindful Nonreactivity, Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress as Mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community Intervention-Pathways to Enhance Mental Health in University Students: Secondary Evaluation of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Student Participants.

Mindful Nonreactivity, Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress as Mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community Intervention-Pathways to Enhance Mental Health in University Students: Secondary Evaluation of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Student Participants.

Background: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in mental health promotion and treatment. Despite widespread evidence of effectiveness with different populations and delivery modes, there are sparse findings concerning the mechanisms of action in MBIs.

Objective: The objective of this paper was to understand the mediators of the Mindfulness Virtual Community (MVC) intervention, an 8-week, multicomponent, online mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy (M-CBT) intervention, based on a secondary evaluation of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with student participants.

Methods: Mediation analysis, using structural equation modeling, was used to assess direct and indirect relationships between study group (ie, intervention or wait list control) and outcomes. Consistent with the intervention's theoretical perspective and direct effects paths, a model was specified to evaluate whether mindful nonreactivity, as evaluated by the 5-factor mindfulness questionnaire, mediated the effect of MVC intervention on anxiety and depression (as symptom-driven outcomes), and perceived stress and quality of life (as functional outcomes). The model included additional mediating paths for perceived stress through anxiety and depression, and for quality of life through anxiety, depression, and perceived stress. The model was thereafter extended, adjusting for pre-intervention differences in mindfulness (ie, observing, describing, activity with awareness, nonjudgment, and nonreactivity) facets.

Results: Direct (nonmediated) effects indicated statistically significant differences at 8 weeks between the MVC and waitlist control (WLC) groups on depression (-1.72; P=.002), anxiety (-3.40; P=.001), perceived stress (-2.44; P<.001), quality of life (4.31; P=.005), and the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness (1.63; P<.001), in favor of the MVC intervention. Mediation analysis supported the mediating role of the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress through single and sequential mediation paths. Results indicated good fit characteristics for the main (comparative fit index [CFI]=.99; root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA]=.05; standardized root-mean-square residual [SRMR]=.05) and extended (CFI=.99; RMSEA=.04; SRMR=.04) models.

Conclusions: This research underscores the importance of mindful nonreactivity, depression, and anxiety as key mediators of MVC intervention benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信