体外冲击波治疗、超声治疗和皮质类固醇注射治疗外侧上髁炎的比较:荟萃分析综述。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Pengcheng Zhu, Peiyuan Tang, Jingyue Su, Yixin Yang, Shengwu Yang, Chunwu Zhang, Wenfeng Xiao, Yang Zhou, Yusheng Li, Zhenhan Deng
{"title":"体外冲击波治疗、超声治疗和皮质类固醇注射治疗外侧上髁炎的比较:荟萃分析综述。","authors":"Pengcheng Zhu, Peiyuan Tang, Jingyue Su, Yixin Yang, Shengwu Yang, Chunwu Zhang, Wenfeng Xiao, Yang Zhou, Yusheng Li, Zhenhan Deng","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the methodological quality of meta-analyses (MAs) and resolve evidence inconsistencies by quantifying overlap in primary studies, thereby providing enhanced evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) versus placebo, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches in four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, until August 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) graded the quality and reliability of the MAs, and the quality of outcomes was graded by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE) was applied to analyze overlap and classified the resulting evidence into four categories (I-IV) on the basis of evidence classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine MAs were included for analysis: five had a high AMSTAR 2 rating, three had a moderate AMSTAR 2 rating, and one had a low AMSTAR 2 rating. GROOVE analysis revealed substantial overlap, informing evidence classification. ESWT can effectively reduce the pain assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) compared with placebo (MD = -0.68; 95% CI -1.06, -0.3; P = 0.0004; I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Compared with ultrasound therapy, ESWT has a significantly large reduction in the level of pain after the treatment at 1-month follow-up (MD = -1.42; 95% CI -2.14, -0.7; P = 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%) and 3-month follow-up (MD = -1.65; 95% CI -1.81, -1.49; P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%). ESWT is better than corticosteroid injection when calculating the pooled effect size of VAS (SMD = 1.13, 95% Cl 0.72, 1.55; P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). ESWT also has a significant difference in the rate of 50% reduction in pain (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.09, 1.75; P = 0.008; I<sup>2</sup> = 41%). However, compared with placebo, it has no clinically important difference of grip strength (MD = 3.33; 95% CI 0.93, 5.73; P = 0.007; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%), and the pain score of Thomsen test (MD = -3.22; 95% CI -14.06, 7.62; P = 0.56; I<sup>2</sup> = 69%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESWT has a significant difference in reducing pain evaluation and relief of pain symptoms, and the effect is better than ultrasound therapy and corticosteroid injections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong></p><p><strong>This protocol has been registered in the prospero database: </strong>CRD42024586419.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Pengcheng Zhu, Peiyuan Tang, Jingyue Su, Yixin Yang, Shengwu Yang, Chunwu Zhang, Wenfeng Xiao, Yang Zhou, Yusheng Li, Zhenhan Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the methodological quality of meta-analyses (MAs) and resolve evidence inconsistencies by quantifying overlap in primary studies, thereby providing enhanced evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) versus placebo, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches in four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, until August 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) graded the quality and reliability of the MAs, and the quality of outcomes was graded by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE) was applied to analyze overlap and classified the resulting evidence into four categories (I-IV) on the basis of evidence classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine MAs were included for analysis: five had a high AMSTAR 2 rating, three had a moderate AMSTAR 2 rating, and one had a low AMSTAR 2 rating. GROOVE analysis revealed substantial overlap, informing evidence classification. ESWT can effectively reduce the pain assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) compared with placebo (MD = -0.68; 95% CI -1.06, -0.3; P = 0.0004; I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Compared with ultrasound therapy, ESWT has a significantly large reduction in the level of pain after the treatment at 1-month follow-up (MD = -1.42; 95% CI -2.14, -0.7; P = 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 92%) and 3-month follow-up (MD = -1.65; 95% CI -1.81, -1.49; P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 98%). ESWT is better than corticosteroid injection when calculating the pooled effect size of VAS (SMD = 1.13, 95% Cl 0.72, 1.55; P < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0). ESWT also has a significant difference in the rate of 50% reduction in pain (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.09, 1.75; P = 0.008; I<sup>2</sup> = 41%). However, compared with placebo, it has no clinically important difference of grip strength (MD = 3.33; 95% CI 0.93, 5.73; P = 0.007; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%), and the pain score of Thomsen test (MD = -3.22; 95% CI -14.06, 7.62; P = 0.56; I<sup>2</sup> = 69%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESWT has a significant difference in reducing pain evaluation and relief of pain symptoms, and the effect is better than ultrasound therapy and corticosteroid injections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong></p><p><strong>This protocol has been registered in the prospero database: </strong>CRD42024586419.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估meta分析(MAs)的方法学质量,并通过量化初步研究的重叠来解决证据不一致的问题,从而为体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)与安慰剂、超声治疗和皮质类固醇注射治疗外侧上髁炎的疗效提供更有力的证据。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science四个数据库,检索时间截止到2024年8月。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。评估系统评价的测量工具2 (AMSTAR 2)对MAs的质量和可靠性进行了分级,结果的质量通过建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)进行了分级。应用GROOVE (Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews)对重叠进行分析,并根据证据分类标准将得到的证据分为四类(I-IV)。结果:共有9个MAs被纳入分析:5个具有高AMSTAR 2评级,3个具有中等AMSTAR 2评级,1个具有低AMSTAR 2评级。GROOVE分析显示大量重叠,为证据分类提供了信息。与安慰剂相比,ESWT可有效减轻视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛(MD = -0.68; 95% CI -1.06, -0.3; P = 0.0004; I2 = 75%)。与超声治疗相比,ESWT治疗后1个月随访(MD = -1.42; 95% CI -2.14, -0.7; P = 0.0001; I2 = 92%)和3个月随访(MD = -1.65; 95% CI -1.81, -1.49; P = 98%)疼痛水平明显降低。计算VAS合并效应大小时,ESWT优于皮质类固醇注射(SMD = 1.13, 95% Cl = 0.72, 1.55; P = 0)。ESWT组在疼痛减轻50%的比率上也有显著差异(RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.09, 1.75; P = 0.008; I2 = 41%)。但与安慰剂相比,握力(MD = 3.33; 95% CI 0.93, 5.73; P = 0.007; I2 = 30%)和Thomsen试验疼痛评分(MD = -3.22; 95% CI -14.06, 7.62; P = 0.56; I2 = 69%)无临床意义差异。结论:ESWT在减轻疼痛评价和缓解疼痛症状方面具有显著差异,且效果优于超声治疗和皮质类固醇注射。证据级别i:该协议已在prospero数据库中注册:CRD42024586419。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the methodological quality of meta-analyses (MAs) and resolve evidence inconsistencies by quantifying overlap in primary studies, thereby providing enhanced evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) versus placebo, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis.

Methods: We conducted searches in four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, until August 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) graded the quality and reliability of the MAs, and the quality of outcomes was graded by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE) was applied to analyze overlap and classified the resulting evidence into four categories (I-IV) on the basis of evidence classification criteria.

Results: A total of nine MAs were included for analysis: five had a high AMSTAR 2 rating, three had a moderate AMSTAR 2 rating, and one had a low AMSTAR 2 rating. GROOVE analysis revealed substantial overlap, informing evidence classification. ESWT can effectively reduce the pain assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) compared with placebo (MD = -0.68; 95% CI -1.06, -0.3; P = 0.0004; I2 = 75%). Compared with ultrasound therapy, ESWT has a significantly large reduction in the level of pain after the treatment at 1-month follow-up (MD = -1.42; 95% CI -2.14, -0.7; P = 0.0001; I2 = 92%) and 3-month follow-up (MD = -1.65; 95% CI -1.81, -1.49; P < 0.00001; I2 = 98%). ESWT is better than corticosteroid injection when calculating the pooled effect size of VAS (SMD = 1.13, 95% Cl 0.72, 1.55; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0). ESWT also has a significant difference in the rate of 50% reduction in pain (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.09, 1.75; P = 0.008; I2 = 41%). However, compared with placebo, it has no clinically important difference of grip strength (MD = 3.33; 95% CI 0.93, 5.73; P = 0.007; I2 = 30%), and the pain score of Thomsen test (MD = -3.22; 95% CI -14.06, 7.62; P = 0.56; I2 = 69%).

Conclusions: ESWT has a significant difference in reducing pain evaluation and relief of pain symptoms, and the effect is better than ultrasound therapy and corticosteroid injections.

Level of evidence i:

This protocol has been registered in the prospero database: CRD42024586419.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信