Lynn Gitlow, Lauren Amato, Elizabeth Newcombe, Dominic Mikula, Ahmed Alghamdi, Jenna Gaglione, Cayla Jones, Beatrice Kim, Dominica Mountain, Nicole Osofsky, Samantha Pinand, Alexandra Santanello, Heather Scheck, Hannah Wichard
{"title":"Jaco机械臂对用户日常活动表现满意度的影响","authors":"Lynn Gitlow, Lauren Amato, Elizabeth Newcombe, Dominic Mikula, Ahmed Alghamdi, Jenna Gaglione, Cayla Jones, Beatrice Kim, Dominica Mountain, Nicole Osofsky, Samantha Pinand, Alexandra Santanello, Heather Scheck, Hannah Wichard","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2546647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assistive technology (AT) such as the Jaco robotic arm (JRA) provides significant benefits for individuals with upper extremity disabilities (UED). Despite these advantages, barriers including funding limitations, lack of awareness, and insufficient evidence of efficacy can hinder access. This study examined the effectiveness of the JRA by evaluating user performance and satisfaction with occupational performance (OP) before and after device use. A non-experimental retrospective mixed-method study was employed. Participants completed interviews via Zoom using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Interview data were analyzed and member checking was conducted to ensure accuracy. A convenience sample of JRA users in North America, aged 18 years and older, was recruited in collaboration with Partners in Medicine, the device's North America distributor. The COPM identified challenges in self-care, productivity, and leisure, as well as corresponding performance and satisfaction ratings prior to and following JRA use. Twelve users, aged 30-58, who had used the JRA for 3 weeks to 8 years, participated. Common OP problems included opening and closing doors, retrieving items, drinking, manipulating phones, eating, community mobility, and repositioning body parts. Participants consistently reported meaningful improvements after acquiring the JRA. Individual average performance score change ranged from 3.2 to 8.3, while satisfaction scores ranged from 3.0 to 7.7. This study demonstrated that the JRA was a beneficial AT intervention for study participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of the Jaco robotic arm on user satisfaction with performance in everyday activities.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Gitlow, Lauren Amato, Elizabeth Newcombe, Dominic Mikula, Ahmed Alghamdi, Jenna Gaglione, Cayla Jones, Beatrice Kim, Dominica Mountain, Nicole Osofsky, Samantha Pinand, Alexandra Santanello, Heather Scheck, Hannah Wichard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2546647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assistive technology (AT) such as the Jaco robotic arm (JRA) provides significant benefits for individuals with upper extremity disabilities (UED). Despite these advantages, barriers including funding limitations, lack of awareness, and insufficient evidence of efficacy can hinder access. This study examined the effectiveness of the JRA by evaluating user performance and satisfaction with occupational performance (OP) before and after device use. A non-experimental retrospective mixed-method study was employed. Participants completed interviews via Zoom using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Interview data were analyzed and member checking was conducted to ensure accuracy. A convenience sample of JRA users in North America, aged 18 years and older, was recruited in collaboration with Partners in Medicine, the device's North America distributor. The COPM identified challenges in self-care, productivity, and leisure, as well as corresponding performance and satisfaction ratings prior to and following JRA use. Twelve users, aged 30-58, who had used the JRA for 3 weeks to 8 years, participated. Common OP problems included opening and closing doors, retrieving items, drinking, manipulating phones, eating, community mobility, and repositioning body parts. Participants consistently reported meaningful improvements after acquiring the JRA. Individual average performance score change ranged from 3.2 to 8.3, while satisfaction scores ranged from 3.0 to 7.7. This study demonstrated that the JRA was a beneficial AT intervention for study participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2546647\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2546647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
辅助技术(AT),如Jaco机械臂(JRA)为上肢残疾(UED)患者提供了显著的好处。尽管有这些优势,但资金限制、缺乏认识和有效性证据不足等障碍可能阻碍获取。本研究通过评估使用者在器械使用前后的表现和职业表现满意度(OP)来检验JRA的有效性。采用非实验回顾性混合方法研究。参与者使用加拿大职业绩效评估(COPM)通过Zoom完成访谈。对访谈数据进行分析,并进行成员检查,确保准确性。与该设备的北美分销商Partners in Medicine合作,在北美招募了年龄在18岁及以上的JRA用户的方便样本。COPM确定了在使用JRA之前和之后的自我护理、生产力和休闲方面的挑战,以及相应的性能和满意度评级。12名年龄在30-58岁之间,使用JRA 3周到8年的用户参与了研究。常见的OP问题包括打开和关闭门、取回物品、喝水、操作电话、吃饭、社区活动和重新定位身体部位。参与者在获得JRA后一致报告有意义的改善。个人平均绩效得分变化范围为3.2 - 8.3,满意度得分变化范围为3.0 - 7.7。本研究表明,JRA对研究参与者是一种有益的AT干预。
Impacts of the Jaco robotic arm on user satisfaction with performance in everyday activities.
Assistive technology (AT) such as the Jaco robotic arm (JRA) provides significant benefits for individuals with upper extremity disabilities (UED). Despite these advantages, barriers including funding limitations, lack of awareness, and insufficient evidence of efficacy can hinder access. This study examined the effectiveness of the JRA by evaluating user performance and satisfaction with occupational performance (OP) before and after device use. A non-experimental retrospective mixed-method study was employed. Participants completed interviews via Zoom using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Interview data were analyzed and member checking was conducted to ensure accuracy. A convenience sample of JRA users in North America, aged 18 years and older, was recruited in collaboration with Partners in Medicine, the device's North America distributor. The COPM identified challenges in self-care, productivity, and leisure, as well as corresponding performance and satisfaction ratings prior to and following JRA use. Twelve users, aged 30-58, who had used the JRA for 3 weeks to 8 years, participated. Common OP problems included opening and closing doors, retrieving items, drinking, manipulating phones, eating, community mobility, and repositioning body parts. Participants consistently reported meaningful improvements after acquiring the JRA. Individual average performance score change ranged from 3.2 to 8.3, while satisfaction scores ranged from 3.0 to 7.7. This study demonstrated that the JRA was a beneficial AT intervention for study participants.